Cited by 33Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorChild Abuse and TraumaStress Responses and Cortisol

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Early‐Life Adversity and Blunted Stress Reactivity as Predictors of Alcohol and Drug use in Persons With COMT (rs4680) Val158Met Genotypes

Open access

Abstract

Background: Risk for alcoholism may be enhanced by exposure to early‐life adversity (ELA) in persons with genetic vulnerabilities. We examined ELA in the presence of a common variant of the gene for the enzyme catechol‐O‐methyltransferase (COMT, Val158Met, rs4680) in relation to cortisol reactivity, the onset of early drinking, and experimentation with drugs. Methods: Saliva cortisol reactivity to speech and mental arithmetic stress was measured in 480 healthy young adults (23.5 years of age, 50% females) who experienced either 0, 1, or ≥ 2 forms of ELA during childhood and adolescence, provided information on use of alcohol and recreational drugs, and were genotyped for the Val158Met polymorphism. Results: ELA led to progressively smaller cortisol responses in the Met/Met and Val/Met allele groups but to progressively larger responses in Val homozygotes, F = 3.29, p = 0.011. ELA independently predicted earlier age at first drink, F = 14.2, p < 0.0001, with a larger effect in Met‐allele carriers, F = 13.95, p < 0.00001, and a smaller effect in Val homozygotes, F = 4.14, p = 0.02. Similar effects were seen in recreational drug use. Cortisol reactivity was unrelated to drinking behavior or drug experimentation. Conclusions: ELA leads to blunted stress reactivity and, independently, contributes to potentially risky drinking and drug‐use behaviors in persons carrying 1 or 2 copies of the COMT 158Met allele. The results reinforce the impact of early experience on the stress axis and on risky behaviors, and they point to the 158Met allele as conveying a vulnerability to the early environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acer.14079

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 72

  1. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.10.010 · DOI
  2. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-06-02008.2003 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02397.x · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.01.030 · DOI
  5. American_Psychiatric_Association, 1994, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  6. 10.1176/appi.ps.53.8.1001 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1017/S1461145711001763 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1126/science.126.3270.400 · DOI
  10. Babor TF, 1992, AUDIT: The alcohol use disorders identification test: Guidelines for use in primary health care
  11. Babor TF, 2001, The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for use in primary care
  12. 10.1002/ajmg.b.31150 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00541-0 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1556/2006.4.2015.006 · DOI
  15. 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1556 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0165-1781(88)90024-8 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/mp.2011.115 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0306-4530(02)00007-0 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1002/oby.20202 · DOI
  21. 10.1210/jcem-49-3-346 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.025 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00205.x · DOI
  24. 10.1126/science.1072290 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1126/science.1083968 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1086/425589 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Cohen J, 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
  28. 10.1016/S0079-6123(00)26022-6 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1007/s10964-012-9746-y · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0376-8716(99)00003-4 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/1745691614556682 · DOI
  32. 10.1001/archpsyc.63.12.1396 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0091-7435(03)00123-3 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1007/s10519-010-9336-2 · DOI
  35. 10.1073/pnas.111134598 · DOI
  36. 10.1037/0021-843X.113.2.258 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2008.00441.x · DOI
  38. 10.1002/da.20378 · DOI
  39. 10.15288/jsa.1993.54.393 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.03.021 · DOI
  41. 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.208 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/nrg1635 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1371/journal.pone.0065662 · DOI
  44. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06889.x · DOI
  45. 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90109-K · DOI
  46. 10.1097/00008571-199710000-00002 · DOI
  47. 10.1021/bi00013a008 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.10.006 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1080/10253890.2019.1581760 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/npp.2015.101 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/npp.2015.347 · DOI
  52. 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000481 · DOI
  53. 10.1111/acer.12412 · DOI
  54. 10.1111/acer.12016 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.10.018 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.02.015 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/0022-3999(80)90033-1 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.03.021 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.4.652 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00556-0 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/0959-4388(95)80028-X · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00002.x · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00216-9 · DOI
  64. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0552-08.2008 · DOI
  65. 10.3758/s13415-014-0320-9 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.10.012 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.05.006 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.02.001 · DOI
  69. 10.1038/npp.2013.24 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.04.022 · DOI
  71. 10.1007/s00213-004-1938-z · DOI
  72. 10.1126/science.1078546 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lovallo, W. R., Cohoon, A. J., Sorocco, K. H., Vincent, A. S., Acheson, A., Hodgkinson, C. A., & Goldman, D.
Affiliations
  • Oklahoma City VA Medical Center (US)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Lovallo, William R.
Venue
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-05-31
Volume
43
Issue
7
Pages
1519-1527
ISSN
  • 0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0277
OpenAlex
W2947449568
Cited by
33
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (AA12207)
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
childhood adversity, cortisol response, catechol-O-methyltransferase, COMT Val158Met polymorphism, age at first drink, alcohol consumption, recreational drug use, genetic susceptibility, stress axis, young adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Alcoholism, Alleles, Catechol O-Methyltransferase, Child, Child Abuse, Female, Genotype, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Illicit Drugs, Stress, Psychological, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review