Cited by 389Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMental Health Research Topics

Measured Gene-Environment Interactions in Psychopathology: Concepts, Research Strategies, and Implications for Research, Intervention, and Public Understanding of Genetics

Moffitt, Terrie E., Caspi, Avshalom, Rutter, Michael·2006·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

There is much curiosity about interactions between genes and environmental risk factors for psychopathology, but this interest is accompanied by uncertainty. This article aims to address this uncertainty. First, we explain what is and is not meant by gene-environment interaction. Second, we discuss reasons why such interactions were thought to be rare in psychopathology, and argue instead that they ought to be common. Third, we summarize emerging evidence about gene-environment interactions in mental disorders. Fourth, we argue that research on gene-environment interactions should be hypothesis driven, and we put forward strategies to guide future studies. Fifth, we describe potential benefits of studying measured gene-environment interactions for basic neuroscience, gene hunting, intervention, and public understanding of genetics. We suggest that information about nurture might be harnessed to make new discoveries about the nature of psychopathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00002.x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Logistic regression techniques used to identify interactions in gene-environment studies can produce both false-positive and false-negative findings.

    “The use of logistic regression techniques to identify interactions in GxE studies is widespread, but it is important to note that this technique can lead to both false-positive and false-negative findings”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., & Rutter, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Moffitt, Terrie E.
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2006-03
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
5-27
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W2080229119
Cited by
389
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 26
FWCI
20.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
gene-environment interaction, psychopathology, mental illness, environmental risk factors, hypothesis-driven research, gene discovery, public understanding of genetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review