Cited by 12Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyBipolar Disorder and TreatmentSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Adapting dialectical behavior therapy in Mandarin‐speaking Chinese patients with borderline personality disorder: An open pilot trial in Taiwan

Chang, Ting‐Hsin, Liu, Shen‐Ing, Korslund, Kathryn, Lin, Chen‐Ju, Lin, Ying, Huang, Hui‐Chun, Chen, Shu‐Chin, Chang, Yi‐Hung +2 more·2022·Asia-Pacific Psychiatry

Abstract

Introduction: Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) is the most commonly used treatment for patients suffering from borderline personality disorder (BPD). However, data on its applications in Asian countries remain lacking. This pilot study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of applying Mandarin‐translated DBT among suicidal Chinese patients with BPD in Taiwan. Methods: An open‐label trial design was implemented for the 1‐year standard DBT model. Patients from a psychiatric outpatient department in a general hospital in Taiwan with a history of ≥2 episodes of suicidal behavior within the previous year and who scored >40 on the Borderline Symptom List were invited to participate in this trial. Outcomes of suicidal behaviors, severity of BPD and depression symptoms, suicidal ideation, hopelessness, and quality of life were assessed at the beginning of the treatment and every 3 months until 12 months. Results: Eighteen patients participated, three of whom (16.7%) dropped out. Significant improvements were found in the frequency and severity of suicidal behaviors and ideations, depressive symptoms, and BPD symptoms beginning as early as the third month after initiating DBT. Discussion: This pilot study found that DBT may be an effective and feasible intervention for Mandarin‐speaking individuals with a recent history of suicidal behaviors with BPD. Future randomized controlled trials with comparison groups are needed to further determine the efficacy of DBT on this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/appy.12451

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, T., Liu, S., Korslund, K., Lin, C., Lin, Y., Huang, H., Chen, S., Chang, Y., Sun, F., & Wu, S.
Affiliations
  • Mackay Memorial Hospital (TW)
  • Bellevue Hospital Center (US)
Corresponding author
Wu, Shu‐I
Venue
Asia-Pacific Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03-08
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
e12451-e12451
ISSN
  • 1758-5864 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5872
OpenAlex
W3135851765
Cited by
12
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Asia-Pacific Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
dialectical behavior therapy, borderline personality disorder, suicidal behavior, suicidal ideation, Mandarin translation, Chinese patients, treatment feasibility, depressive symptoms, hopelessness, quality of life, cross-cultural adaptation
MeSH terms
Dialectical Behavior Therapy, Behavior Therapy, Borderline Personality Disorder, China, Humans, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Taiwan, Self-Injurious Behavior, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review