CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Moral licensing effect of work engagement: The role of psychological entitlement and relationship conflict with supervisors

Zhang, Lianghua, Wang, Yongli·2025·Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility
DOI 10.1111/beer.12659
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Given the importance of work engagement for organizations and the almost unified and steadfast understanding of its benefits, it is imperative to investigate the potential downside of work engagement to prevent unexpected damage. However, there has been relatively little research on its negative impacts. Drawing on the moral licensing theory, this study identifies the potential negative effects of work engagement by exploring the mediating role of psychological entitlement. An online experiment and a survey are conducted to test the theoretical model. The results reveal that work engagement leads to deviant workplace behavior through psychological entitlement only in cases where there is a higher level of relationship conflict with supervisors. The conclusions of this study shed light on how work engagement negatively affects organizations. The current study also contributes to practice by suggesting that supervisors should be aware of employees with a higher level of work engagement and communicate with them in a reasonable manner.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/beer.12659

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 95

  1. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.02.006 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1080/15332845.2016.1147936 · DOI
  3. 10.1108/JEAS-07-2020-0128 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/10463280802613866 · DOI
  5. 10.1017/jmo.2019.1 · DOI
  6. 10.1174/021347413806196753 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/15555240903188398 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/00223981003648336 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1348/096317909X402596 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.08.008 · DOI
  11. 10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/09585192.2012.651313 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/0146167215572134 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/a0032857 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102415 · DOI
  16. 10.1207/s15327752jpa8301_04 · DOI
  17. 10.1037/a0021886 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.012 · DOI
  20. 10.2307/258093 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/0149206305279602 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Cui D., 2021, The mechanism of instant messaging overload in the workplace affecting employees' deviant behavior from the perspective of self‐control resource, Chinese Journal of Management, 18, 362
  23. 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.09.001 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.5465/amj.2008.35732596 · DOI
  26. 10.1177/0149206311415280 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1177/0146167214533131 · DOI
  28. 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111149 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.025 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/0018726710362923 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s10551-004-2779-8 · DOI
  33. 10.4102/sajems.v24i1.3749 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000411 · DOI
  36. 10.1037/a0038559 · DOI
  37. 10.2307/3069453 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636859 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/s10551-019-04246-0 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.06.006 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.004 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102413 · DOI
  43. 10.1002/job.2167 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Kong M., 2020, The moral licensing effect between work effort and unethical pro‐organizational behavior: The moderating influence of Confucian value, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36, 1
  45. 10.1002/smj.3387 · DOI
  46. 10.5465/amj.2020.1761 · DOI
  47. 10.3200/SOCP.149.1.5-28 · DOI
  48. 10.1007/s10551-017-3456-z · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1080/19368623.2014.994154 · DOI
  50. 10.1037/apl0000092 · DOI
  51. 10.3390/ijerph17145019 · DOI
  52. Li Y., 2015, Research on influencing of self‐efficacy, job involvement on job performance of high‐tech enterprise' R&D staff, Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 36, 173
  53. 10.5465/amj.2014.0651 · DOI
  54. 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1111/radm.12430 · DOI
  56. 10.1037/apl0000477 · DOI
  57. 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x · DOI
  58. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01157 · DOI
  59. 10.1177/00332941211051988 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00263.x · DOI
  61. 10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43003-8 · DOI
  62. 10.1177/0022022114551051 · DOI
  63. 10.1007/s10869-019-09623-0 · DOI
  64. Neuber L., 2021, How work engagement relates to performance and absenteeism: A meta‐analysis, European Journal of Work Organizational Psychology, 3, 1
  65. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01239.x · DOI
  66. 10.1177/0146167213493187 · DOI
  67. Robinson D., 2004, The drivers of employee engagement report 408 [white paper]
  68. 10.2307/256693 · DOI
  69. 10.3390/ijerph16081376 · DOI
  70. 10.5465/amj.2013.0566 · DOI
  71. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02326.x · DOI
  72. Schaufeli W., 2010, The conceptualization and measurement of work engagement: A review
  73. Schaufeli W. B., 2012, Work engagement. What do we know and where do we go?, Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology, 14, 3
  74. 10.1177/0013164405282471 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1023/A:1015630930326 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1016/B978-0-12-407188-9.00005-3 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1007/s10902-008-9100-y · DOI
  78. 10.1080/21639159.2013.852911 · DOI
  79. 10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102 · DOI
  80. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102415 · DOI
  81. 10.5465/amj.2011.60263085 · DOI
  82. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.011 · DOI
  83. 10.1007/s12144-019-00339-1 · DOI
  84. 10.1038/s41467‐018‐04616‐8 · DOI
  85. 10.1108/JHTI-09-2019-0105 · DOI
  86. 10.1037/apl0000337 · DOI
  87. 10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103725 · DOI
  88. 10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.018 · DOI
  89. Wu Y., 2020, The effect of humble leadership on creative deviance‐china mediation effect of supervisor‐subordinate guanxi and psychological entitlement, Soft Science, 34, 140
  90. 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00185-6 · DOI
  91. 10.1080/1359432X.2011.557549 · DOI
  92. 10.5465/amj.2014.0234 · DOI
  93. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.596385 · DOI
  94. Zhao K., 2014, Attenuating the negative effect of team relationship conflict: A study based on Chinese context, Journal of Management World, 246, 119
  95. 10.1037/a0017168 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, L., & Wang, Y.
Venue
Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-02-06
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
423-436
ISSN
  • 2694-6416
  • 2694-6424
DOI
10.1111/beer.12659
Cited by
4
References
8
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review