Cited by 1,308Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorWorkaholism, burnout, and well-beingEmployee Performance and Management

Work engagement and financial returns: a diary study on the role of job and personal resources

Open access
Xanthopoulou, Despoina, Bakker, Arnold B., Demerouti, Evangelia, Schaufeli, Wilmar B.·2009·Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Abstract

This study investigates how daily fluctuations in job resources (autonomy, coaching, and team climate) are related to employees' levels of personal resources (self‐efficacy, self‐esteem, and optimism), work engagement, and financial returns. Forty‐two employees working in three branches of a fast‐food company completed a questionnaire and a diary booklet over 5 consecutive workdays. Consistent with hypotheses, multi‐level analyses revealed that day‐level job resources had an effect on work engagement through day‐level personal resources, after controlling for general levels of personal resources and engagement. Day‐level coaching had a direct positive relationship with day‐level work engagement, which, in‐turn, predicted daily financial returns. Additionally, previous days' coaching had a positive, lagged effect on next days' work engagement (through next days' optimism), and on next days' financial returns.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/096317908x285633

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Goal and work engagement research supports the expectation that effort and progress toward a life purpose vary day to day.

    “Research on goals and work engagement supports our expectation that effort and progress toward a purpose in life would vary from day-to-day”

    From Commitment to a purpose in life: An antidote to the suffering by individuals with social anxiety disorder. (2013) · cites this paper as Xanthopoulou, Bakker, Demerouti, & Schaufeli, 2009

    The paper’s “Fluctuations over time” section reports within-person variation in day-level work engagement, supporting the expectation that engagement can change from day to day. It studies employees’ work engagement and performance, however, not daily effort or progress toward a purpose in life; that extension is not established by this source. The indexed passages provide no page number. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Individuals who feel energetic tend to maintain a vigorous work style, stay engaged with tasks, notice work-related opportunities, and act proactively.

    “Additionally, individuals who feel full of energy tend to sustain a vigorous work style, stay engaged with work tasks, be more sensitive to work-related opportunities, and be more proactive at work (Hahn et al., 2012;Xanthopoulou et al., 2009).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Xanthopoulou, Despoina
Venue
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-03
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
183-200
ISSN
  • 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8325
OpenAlex
W2136455011
Cited by
1,308
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 89 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 68
FWCI
69.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
Keywords
work engagement, financial returns, job resources, personal resources, coaching, autonomy, team climate, self-efficacy, self-esteem, optimism, daily fluctuations, lagged effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review