Cited by 33Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentEarly Childhood Education and Development

Individual differences in the effectiveness of self‐distancing for young children's emotion regulation

Open access
Grenell, Amanda, Prager, Emily O., Schaefer, Catherine, Kross, Ethan, Duckworth, Angela L., Carlson, Stephanie M.·2019·British Journal of Developmental Psychology

Abstract

Self‐distancing has been shown to improve children's self‐regulation in a variety of tasks. However, it is unknown whether this strategy is more effective for some children than others. This study investigated self‐distancing in relation to individual differences in executive function ( EF ) and effortful control ( EC ). Typically developing 4‐ ( n = 72) and 6‐year‐olds ( n = 67) were randomly assigned to think about the self from one of four perspectives: self‐immersed, control, third‐person, or competent media character. Children participated in a frustrating task for up to 10 min and overt expressions of frustration were coded. Conceptually replicating prior research with adults, younger children, and children with lower EF and lower EC (independent of age) benefitted the most from self‐distancing. This suggests self‐distancing is especially effective during a frustrating task for children with less developed self‐control, adding to a growing body of research showing self‐distancing is especially effective for vulnerable individuals. Statement of contribution: What is already known on this subject? Using third‐person speech and pretending to be a media character improve children's self‐regulation. Age and theory of mind skills are related to the effectiveness of self‐distancing. What does this study add? Self‐distancing can help children regulate their emotions during an emotionally charged task. Individual differences in executive function and effortful control are related to the efficacy of self‐distancing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjdp.12259

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Across three studies, 4-6 year olds but not 3 year olds showed improved behavioral performance and less frustration during a difficult cognitive task once a decentered self-perspective was adopted.

    “Across three studies, 4–6 year olds but not 3 year olds showed improved behavioral performance39,40 and less frustration41 during a difficult cognitive task once a decentered self-perspective was adopted (42.51–71.70 months).”

    From Decentering as a core component in the psychological treatment and prevention of youth anxiety and depression: a narrative review and insight report (2021) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Global frustration rating section reports less frustration for 4-year-olds in the exemplar condition than in the self-immersed condition, but no significant condition differences for 6-year-olds. The Overview and hypotheses section describes a frustrating locked-box task, not the difficult cognitive task described in the claim; this study did not test 3-year-olds. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The increase in decentering ability over time is likely due to age-related improvements in executive functioning.

    “A small number of studies additionally report that this ability increases over time38,43,44, likely due to age-related improvements in executive functioning41.”

    From Decentering as a core component in the psychological treatment and prevention of youth anxiety and depression: a narrative review and insight report (2021) · cites this paper as [41]

    The paper’s introductory discussion says executive function increases with age and proposes that it may help children adopt a distanced perspective. It does not show that decentering ability increases over time because of executive-function development; its Discussion instead reports that younger children benefited more from self-distancing than older children. Page numbers are unavailable for these passages in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (2006). Temperament. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3, Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 99-166). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grenell, A., Prager, E. O., Schaefer, C., Kross, E., Duckworth, A. L., & Carlson, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Grenell, Amanda
Venue
British Journal of Developmental Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-07-15
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
84-100
ISSN
  • 0261-510X (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-835X
OpenAlex
W2884462259
Cited by
33
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
John Templeton Foundation (21564)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
self-distancing, emotion regulation, executive function, effortful control, individual differences, young children, frustration, self-immersion, third-person perspective, media characters, self-control, theory of mind
MeSH terms
Self-Control, Age Factors, Child, Child Behavior, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Executive Function, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review