Cited by 212Social and Intergroup PsychologyEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessSchool Choice and Performance

Social Class is Dead. Long Live Social Class! Stereotype Threat among Low Socioeconomic Status Individuals

Open access
Spencer, Bettina, Castano, Emanuele·2007·Social Justice Research

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11211-007-0047-7

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Asking college students in the United States about their socioeconomic status before rather than after an intelligence test reduced lower class students' confidence in their academic ability and their performance.

    “Another study found that asking college students in the United States about their SES before (rather than after) an intelligence test reduced lower class students' confidence in their academic ability and their performance (B.Spencer & Castano, 2007)”

    From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as B.Spencer & Castano, 2007

    The available copy contains a repository listing for the article, not passages describing its experiment or results (no article section or page is available). Searches for the before-versus-after SES question, intelligence-test performance, and confidence in academic ability found no relevant passage. The claim therefore cannot be checked against this copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Negative stereotypes are thought to explain why a simple question about group membership can be enough to evoke stereotype threat and thus reduce performance only among low-status groups.

    “and are thought to explain why a simple question about group membership can be enough to evoke stereotype threat and thus reduce performance only among low-status groups (Mello et al., 2010;Spencer & Castano, 2007).”

    From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as Spencer & Castano, 2007

    The available indexed passages are unpaginated title and IRIS repository metadata, not the paper’s substantive text. Searches for a group-membership question and for negative stereotypes affecting performance found no passage addressing the claimed mechanism or its restriction to low-status groups. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Similar results have been found with other groups in other contexts.

    “Similar results have been found with other groups in other contexts (Croizet & Claire, 1998;B. Spencer & Castano, 2007).”

    From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as B. Spencer & Castano, 2007

    The available copy identifies the paper as concerning stereotype threat among low-socioeconomic-status individuals, but the passages contain only a title and repository metadata, not study findings. Searches for stereotype-threat performance results found no passage establishing the claimed similar results in another group or context. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spencer, B., & Castano, E.
Affiliations
The New School (US)
Corresponding author
Spencer, Bettina
Venue
Social Justice Research
Published
2007-11-07
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
418-432
ISSN
  • 0885-7466 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6725
OpenAlex
W2082376760
Cited by
212
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 6
FWCI
14.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Social Justice Research (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
stereotype threat, socioeconomic status, low-income students, achievement gap, standardized testing, academic performance, self-confidence, stigmatized groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review