Cited by 747Career Development and DiversityEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Reducing the Gender Achievement Gap in College Science: A Classroom Study of Values Affirmation

Miyake, Akira, Kost-Smith, Lauren E., Finkelstein, Noah D., Pollock, Steven J., Cohen, Geoffrey L., Ito, Tiffany A.·2010·Science

Abstract

In many science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines, women are outperformed by men in test scores, jeopardizing their success in science-oriented courses and careers. The current study tested the effectiveness of a psychological intervention, called values affirmation, in reducing the gender achievement gap in a college-level introductory physics class. In this randomized double-blind study, 399 students either wrote about their most important values or not, twice at the beginning of the 15-week course. Values affirmation reduced the male-female performance and learning difference substantially and elevated women's modal grades from the C to B range. Benefits were strongest for women who tended to endorse the stereotype that men do better than women in physics. A brief psychological intervention may be a promising way to address the gender gap in science performance and learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1195996

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women who had been randomly assigned to complete values affirmation exercises in their class performed better on their course exams and earned higher grades than did those who completed control exercises.

    “Women who had been randomly assigned to complete values affirmation exercises in their class performed better on their course exams and earned higher grades than did those who completed control exercises.”

    From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Miyake et al. 2010

  • Values affirmation has also helped female college students enrolled in introductory physics, a gateway science course.

    “Values affirmation has also helped another group of students who contend with social identity threat: female college students enrolled in introductory physics, a gateway science course (Miyake et al. 2010).”

    From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Miyake et al. 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miyake, A., Kost-Smith, L. E., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Cohen, G. L., & Ito, T. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Department of Physics, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Miyake, Akira
Venue
Science
Published
2010-11-26
Volume
330
Issue
6008
Pages
1234-1237
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2123684590
Cited by
746
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 150 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 21
FWCI
68.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
gender differences in achievement, values affirmation, gender stereotypes, women in physics, university science education, psychological intervention, gender gap in STEM, introductory physics, student performance
MeSH terms
Achievement, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Physics, Self Concept, Sex Factors, Social Values, Stereotyping, Universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review