Cited by 119Social and Intergroup PsychologyCareer Development and DiversityEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Are all interventions created equal? A multi-threat approach to tailoring stereotype threat interventions.

Open access
Shapiro, Jenessa R., Williams, Amy M., Hambarchyan, Mariam·2013·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

To date, stereotype threat interventions have been considered interchangeable. Across 4 experiments, the present research demonstrates that stereotype threat interventions need to be tailored to the specific form of experienced stereotype threat to be effective. The Multi-Threat Framework (Shapiro & Neuberg, 2007) distinguishes between group-as-target stereotype threats-concerns that a stereotype-relevant performance will reflect poorly on the abilities of one's group-and self-as-target stereotype threats-concerns that a stereotype-relevant performance will reflect poorly on one's own abilities. The present experiments explored Black college students' performance on diagnostic intelligence tests (Experiments 1 and 3) and women's interest (Experiment 2) and performance (Experiment 4) in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). Across the 4 experiments, participants were randomly assigned to experience either a group-as-target or self-as-target stereotype threat. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that role model interventions were successful at protecting only against group-as-target stereotype threats, and Experiments 3 and 4 revealed that self-affirmation interventions were successful at protecting only against self-as-target stereotype threats. The present research provides an experimental test of the Multi-Threat Framework across different negatively stereotyped groups (Black students, female students), different negatively stereotyped domains (general intelligence, STEM), and different outcomes (test performance, career interest). This research suggests that interventions should address the range of possible stereotype threats to effectively protect individuals against these threats. Through an appreciation of the distinct forms of stereotype threats and the ways in which interventions work to reduce them, this research aims to facilitate a more complete understanding of stereotype threat.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0030461

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shapiro, J. R., Williams, A. M., & Hambarchyan, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2013-02
Volume
104
Issue
2
Pages
277-288
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2019882760
Cited by
119
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3
FWCI
24.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (BCS0956321)
  • National Institutes of Health (RC1GM09071, R01GM102701)
  • University of California, Los Angeles
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
stereotype threat, intervention tailoring, self-affirmation intervention, African American college students, women in STEM, career interest
MeSH terms
Achievement, Affect, Analysis of Variance, Black or African American, California, Educational Measurement, Engineering, Female, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Male, Mathematics, Science, Self Concept, Social Identification, Stereotyping, Students, Technology, Women, Black People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review