Cited by 114Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Self‐sacrifice as self‐defence: Mortality salience increases efforts to affirm a symbolic immortal self at the expense of the physical self

Routledge, Clay, Arndt, Jamie·2008·European Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

Abstract The increasing occurrence of suicide bombing attacks highlights a question that has received little direct empirical attention in social psychology. Why are people willing to sacrifice their lives to advance an ideological agenda? The current research suggests that willingness to self‐sacrifice reflects efforts to manage death awareness by investing in a symbolic identity that provides some form of immortality. If willingness to self‐sacrifice is a response to death awareness then increasing the salience of death thoughts should lead to an increase in willingness to self‐sacrifice for a death‐transcending symbolic identity (e.g. one's nation). Further, if self‐sacrifice after mortality salience (MS) is a striving for symbolic immortality then having participants imagine an alternative way to transcend death should moderate this effect. Support for these hypotheses was found as MS increased willingness of British participants to self‐sacrifice for England, but only when an alternative route to symbolic immortality was not provided. Implications are briefly discussed. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejsp.442

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mortality salience has increased participants' willingness to martyr themselves for their worldviews.

    “For example, MS has increased participants' willingness to martyr themselves for their worldviews [18,19];”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Routledge, C., & Arndt, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Routledge, Clay
Venue
European Journal of Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06-05
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
531-541
ISSN
  • 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0992
OpenAlex
W1966958066
Cited by
114
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
self-sacrifice, mortality salience, death awareness, symbolic immortality, symbolic identity, national identity, suicide bombings, self-defense

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review