Cited by 68EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringNeurology and Historical Studies

Collaborative Approach in the Development of High‐Performance Brain–Computer Interfaces for a Neuroprosthetic Arm: Translation from Animal Models to Human Control

Open access
Collinger, Jennifer L., Kryger, Michael A., Barbara, Richard, Betler, Timothy, Bowsher, Kristen, Brown, Elke H. P., Clanton, Samuel T., Degenhart, Alan D. +26 more·2014·Clinical and Translational Science

Abstract

Our research group recently demonstrated that a person with tetraplegia could use a brain–computer interface (BCI) to control a sophisticated anthropomorphic robotic arm with skill and speed approaching that of an able‐bodied person. This multiyear study exemplifies important principles in translating research from foundational theory and animal experiments into a clinical study. We present a roadmap that may serve as an example for other areas of clinical device research as well as an update on study results. Prior to conducting a multiyear clinical trial, years of animal research preceded BCI testing in an epilepsy monitoring unit, and then in a short‐term (28 days) clinical investigation. Scientists and engineers developed the necessary robotic and surgical hardware, software environment, data analysis techniques, and training paradigms. Coordination among researchers, funding institutes, and regulatory bodies ensured that the study would provide valuable scientific information in a safe environment for the study participant. Finally, clinicians from neurosurgery, anesthesiology, physiatry, psychology, and occupational therapy all worked in a multidisciplinary team along with the other researchers to conduct a multiyear BCI clinical study. This teamwork and coordination can be used as a model for others attempting to translate basic science into real‐world clinical situations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cts.12086

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collinger, J. L., Kryger, M. A., Barbara, R., Betler, T., Bowsher, K., Brown, E. H. P., Clanton, S. T., Degenhart, A. D., Foldes, S. T., Gaunt, R. A., Gyulai, F. E., Harchick, E. A., Harrington, D., Helder, J. B., Hemmes, T., Johannes, M. S., Katyal, K. D., Ling, G. S. F., McMorland, A. J. C., Palko, K., Para, M. P., Scheuermann, J., Schwartz, A. B., Skidmore, E. R., Solzbacher, F., Srikameswaran, A. V., Swanson, D. P., Swetz, S., Tyler‐Kabara, E. C., Velliste, M., Wang, W., Weber, D. J., Wodlinger, B., & Boninger, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Veterans Health Administration (US)
  • Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (US)
  • Systems Neuroscience Institute
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Research Conduct and Compliance Office
  • McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Boninger, Michael L.
Venue
Clinical and Translational Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-08-27
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
52-59
ISSN
  • 1752-8054 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-8062
OpenAlex
W1796170220
Cited by
68
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical and Translational Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000005, KL2TR000146)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurology and Historical Studies
Keywords
brain-computer interface, tetraplegia, robotic arm control, animal-to-human translation, epilepsy monitoring unit, multidisciplinary collaboration, clinical trial design
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Artificial Limbs, Cooperative Behavior, Electroencephalography, Humans, Male, Primates, Prosthesis Design, Quadriplegia, Robotics, Software, Spinal Cord Injuries, User-Computer Interface, Models, Animal, Translational Research, Biomedical, Brain-Computer Interfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review