Cited by 149Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentAction Observation and Synchronization

Atypical development of spontaneous social cognition in autism spectrum disorders

Senju, Atsushi·2013·Brain and Development

Abstract

Individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have profound impairment in the development of social interaction and communication. However, it is also known that some 'high-functioning' individuals with ASD show apparently typical capacity to process social information in a controlled experimental settings, despite their difficulties in daily life. The current paper overviews the spontaneous social cognition, spontaneous processing of social information in the absence of explicit instruction or task demand, in individuals with ASD. Three areas of the researches, false belief attribution, imitation/mimicry, and eye gaze processing, have been reviewed. The literatures suggest that high-functioning individuals with ASD (a) do not spontaneously attribute false belief to others, even though they can easily do so when explicitly instructed, (b) can imitate others' goal-directed actions under explicit instruction and show spontaneous mimicry of others' actions when they attend to the action, but are less likely to show spontaneous mimicry without the task structure to navigate attention to others' action and (c) can process others' gaze direction and shift attention to others' gaze directions, but fail to spontaneously attend to another person's eyes in social and communicative context, and less likely to be prompted to respond in response to perceived eye contact. These results are consistent with the claim that individuals with ASD do not spontaneously attend to socially releva…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.braindev.2012.08.002

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Senju, A.
Affiliations
Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Senju, Atsushi
Venue
Brain and Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
96-101
ISSN
0387-7604 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054253481
Cited by
149
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, high-functioning autism, false belief attribution, theory of mind, imitation, mimicry, gaze following, attentional shift, social attention, social communication
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Development, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Communication, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Infant, Interpersonal Relations, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review