Cited by 17Acne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsDermatology and Skin DiseasesOral microbiology and periodontitis research

Distinct skin microbiome modulation following different topical acne treatments in mild acne vulgaris patients: A randomized, investigator‐blinded exploratory study

Wongtada, Chanidapa, Prombutara, Pinidphon, Asawanonda, Pravit, Noppakun, Nopadon, Kumtornrut, Chanat, Chatsuwan, Tanittha·2023·Experimental Dermatology

Abstract

The effects of topical non‐antibiotic acne treatment on skin microbiota have rarely been demonstrated. In the study, we randomized 45 mild acne vulgaris participants into three treatment groups, including a cream‐gel dermocosmetic containing Aqua Posae Filiformis, lipohydroxy acid, salicylic acid, linoleic acid, niacinamide and piroctone olamine (DC), retinoic acid 0.025% cream (VAA) and benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel (BP). At months 0, 1 and 3, skin specimens were swabbed from the cheek and forehead and sequenced by targeting V3‐V4 regions of the 16 S rRNA gene. QIIME2 was used to characterize bacterial communities. Acne severity, sebum level and tolerability were assessed concomitantly in each visit. We found that both VAA and BP could significantly reduce the bacterial diversity at month 1 (p‐value = 0.010 and 0.004 respectively), while no significant reduction was observed in DC group. The microbiota compositions also significantly altered for beta diversity in all treatments (all p‐value = 0.001). An increased Cutibacterium with decreased Staphylococcus relative abundance was observed at months 1 and 3 in DC group, while an opposite trend was demonstrated in VAA and BP groups. These findings suggest a potential impact of DC, VAA and BP on the diversity and composition profiles of the skin microbiota in mild acne participants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/exd.14779

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two randomized controlled trials had numerically but not statistically superior reductions in acne lesion counts with dermocosmetics.

    “two RCTs had numerically but not statistically superior reductions”
  • Five randomized controlled trials showed significantly superior reductions in acne lesion counts with dermocosmetics versus comparators.

    “Five RCTs showed significantly superior reductions in acne lesion counts with dermocosmetics versus comparators”
  • Change in casual surface oil was an outcome in six randomized controlled trials and two non-randomized studies deemed low quality, involving collectively 362 patients managed with dermocosmetics and 261 patients in comparator or placebo groups.

    “Change in casual surface oil was an outcome in six RCTs and two non‐RCTs deemed low quality studies involving collectively 362 patients managed with dermocosmetics and 261 patients in comparator or placebo groups.”
  • Two randomized controlled trials showed reductions in acne lesion counts comparable to benzoyl peroxide 2.5% and 5% and retinoic acid 0.025%.

    “two showed reductions comparable to BPO 2.5% and 5% and retinoic acid 0.025%.”
  • The two low-quality studies showed numerical improvements in oiliness but not statistical differences.

    “The two low‐quality studies showed numerical improvements in oiliness but not statistical differences.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wongtada, C., Prombutara, P., Asawanonda, P., Noppakun, N., Kumtornrut, C., & Chatsuwan, T.
Affiliations
Chulalongkorn University (TH)
Corresponding author
  • Kumtornrut, Chanat
  • Chatsuwan, Tanittha
Venue
Experimental Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-03-18
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
906-914
ISSN
  • 0906-6705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0625
OpenAlex
W4322100261
Cited by
17
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Keywords
acne, skin microbiome, topical acne treatment, benzoyl peroxide, Propionibacterium, Staphylococcus, bacterial diversity, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, mild acne
MeSH terms
Acne Vulgaris, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Benzoyl Peroxide, Humans, Skin, Treatment Outcome, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review