Cited by 40

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural insights into hydrolytic defluorination of difluoroacetate by microbial fluoroacetate dehalogenases

Khusnutdinova, Anna N., Batyrova, Khorcheska A., Brown, Greg, Fedorchuk, Tatiana, Chai, Yao Sheng, Skarina, Tatiana, Flick, Robert, Petit, Alain‐Pierre, Savchenko, Alexei, Stogios, Peter, Yakunin, Alexander F.·2023·The FEBS Journal

Abstract

Fluorine forms the strongest single bond to carbon with the highest bond dissociation energy among natural products. However, fluoroacetate dehalogenases (FADs) have been shown to hydrolyze this bond in fluoroacetate under mild reaction conditions. Furthermore, two recent studies demonstrated that the FAD RPA1163 from Rhodopseudomonas palustris can also accept bulkier substrates. In this study, we explored the substrate promiscuity of microbial FADs and their ability to defluorinate polyfluorinated organic acids. Enzymatic screening of eight purified dehalogenases with reported fluoroacetate defluorination activity revealed significant hydrolytic activity against difluoroacetate in three proteins. Product analysis using liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry identified glyoxylic acid as the final product of enzymatic DFA defluorination. The crystal structures of DAR3835 from Dechloromonas aromatica and NOS0089 from Nostoc sp. were determined in the apo‐state along with the DAR3835 H274N glycolyl intermediate. Structure‐based site‐directed mutagenesis of DAR3835 demonstrated a key role for the catalytic triad and other active site residues in the defluorination of both fluoroacetate and difluoroacetate. Computational analysis of the dimer structures of DAR3835, NOS0089, and RPA1163 indicated the presence of one substrate access tunnel in each protomer. Moreover, protein‐ligand docking simulations suggested similar catalytic mechanisms for the defluorination of both fluoroacetate and difluoroacetate, with difluoroacetate being defluorinated via two consecutive defluorination reactions producing glyoxylate as the final product. Thus, our findings provide molecular insights into substrate promiscuity and catalytic mechanism of FADs, which are promising biocatalysts for applications in synthetic chemistry and bioremediation of fluorochemicals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/febs.16903

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 80

  1. 10.1126/science.164.3884.1123 · DOI
  2. 10.1021/jo0302556 · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.1159979 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0022-1139(01)00375-X · DOI
  5. 10.1021/cen-v088n041.p012 · DOI
  6. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00258 · DOI
  7. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00392 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2014.06.014 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.1131943 · DOI
  10. 10.1021/es961007c · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1039/C9CS00740G · DOI
  12. 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.8b00444 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.12.096 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/anie.201206566 · DOI
  15. 10.1021/jacs.6b06770 · DOI
  16. 10.1021/es900753y · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1021/es070126x · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.075 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1186/s13765-019-0469-6 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.050 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01338.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1128/aem.55.10.2499-2504.1989 · DOI
  23. 10.1128/AEM.00171-09 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143544 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/369729a0 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.nbt.2017.08.005 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1002/etc.2407 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1021/jacs.7b06019 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1021/acs.est.8b00839 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.06.004 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/s41467-020-18813-x · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2004.12.001 · DOI
  33. 10.1021/acscatal.2c01184 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1128/mr.58.4.641-685.1994 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0958-1669(99)80066-4 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/363693a0 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2009.00155.x · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1128/JB.01654-08 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1002/chem.201103369 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1016/S1381-1177(03)00098-5 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1007/s10529-008-9849-4 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1002/cbic.202100414 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1002/tcr.20141 · DOI
  44. 10.1074/jbc.273.47.30897 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1126/science.aag2355 · DOI
  46. 10.1021/jacs.9b03703 · DOI
  47. 10.1021/acscatal.9b04804 · DOI
  48. 10.1021/acs.est.0c08811 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.104999 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1016/S0022-1139(03)00105-2 · DOI
  51. 10.1002/anie.201903801 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462096 · DOI
  53. 10.1089/ees.2000.17.337 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.28a-0162 · DOI
  55. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.105 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.022 · DOI
  57. 10.1002/chem.200801813 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1021/ar020047k · DOI
  59. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.149 · DOI
  60. 10.1111/febs.15071 · DOI
  61. 10.1110/ps3830102 · DOI
  62. Prokop Z, 2012, Protein Engineering Handbook, 421
  63. 10.1002/prot.24772 · DOI
  64. 10.1021/acscatal.6b02081 · DOI
  65. 10.1093/nar/gks363 · DOI
  66. Sehnal D, 2013, MOLE 2.0: advanced approach for analysis of biomacromolecular channels, J Chem, 5, 39
  67. 10.1002/jcc.21256 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/S0167-7012(98)00008-6 · DOI
  69. 10.1107/S0907444906019949 · DOI
  70. 10.1107/S0907444909047337 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1107/S0907444913000061 · DOI
  72. 10.1107/S0907444909052925 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1038/nprot.2015.053 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1107/S0907444911001314 · DOI
  75. 10.1093/bib/bbx108 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1093/nar/gkh381 · DOI
  77. 10.1073/pnas.181342398 · DOI
  78. 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
  79. 10.1093/nar/gkv332 · DOI
  80. 10.1016/0022-5193(68)90069-6 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Khusnutdinova, A. N., Batyrova, K. A., Brown, G., Fedorchuk, T., Chai, Y. S., Skarina, T., Flick, R., Petit, A., Savchenko, A., Stogios, P., & Yakunin, A. F.
Venue
The FEBS Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-07-17
Volume
290
Issue
20
Pages
4966-4983
ISSN
  • 1742-464X
  • 1742-4658
Cited by
40
References
6
Language
en
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review