Cited by 149Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisGeological and Geochemical Analysis

Redox heterogeneity of subsurface waters in the M esoproterozoic ocean

Open access
Sperling, E. A., Rooney, A. D., Hays, L., Sergeev, V. N., Vorob'eva, N. G., Sergeeva, N. D., Selby, D., Johnston, D. T. +1 more·2014·Geobiology

Abstract

A substantial body of evidence suggests that subsurface water masses in mid‐Proterozoic marine basins were commonly anoxic, either euxinic (sulfidic) or ferruginous (free ferrous iron). To further document redox variations during this interval, a multiproxy geochemical and paleobiological investigation was conducted on the approximately 1000‐m‐thick M esoproterozoic (L ower R iphean) A rlan M ember of the K altasy F ormation, central R ussia. Iron speciation geochemistry, supported by organic geochemistry, redox‐sensitive trace element abundances, and pyrite sulfur isotope values, indicates that basinal calcareous shales of the A rlan M ember were deposited beneath an oxygenated water column, and consistent with this interpretation, eukaryotic microfossils are abundant in basinal facies. The Rhenium–Osmium (R e–O s) systematics of the A rlan shales yield depositional ages of 1414 ± 40 and 1427 ± 43 Ma for two horizons near the base of the succession, consistent with previously proposed correlations. The presence of free oxygen in a basinal environment adds an important end member to P roterozoic redox heterogeneity, requiring an explanation in light of previous data from time‐equivalent basins. Very low total organic carbon contents in the Arlan Member are perhaps the key—oxic deep waters are more likely (under any level of atmospheric O2) in oligotrophic systems with low export production. Documentation of a full range of redox heterogeneity in subsurface waters and the existence of local redox controls indicate that no single stratigraphic section or basin can adequately capture both the mean redox profile of Proterozoic oceans and its variance at any given point in time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gbi.12091

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Limited reactive iron enrichment and muted enrichment of redox-sensitive trace elements in basinal shales from the Kaltasy Formation are consistent with at least weakly oxygenated conditions in some deep-shelf environments contemporaneous with euxinic and ferruginous conditions in similar depositional environments elsewhere.

    “Limited reactive iron enrichment and muted enrichment of redox-sensitive trace elements in basinal shales from the Kaltasy Formation in central Russia (∼1.4 Gya) are consistent with at least weakly oxygenated conditions in some deep-shelf environments contemporaneous with euxinic and ferruginous conditions in similar depositional environments elsewhere (Sperling et al. 2014).”

    From The History of Ocean Oxygenation (2022) · cites this paper as Sperling et al. 2014

  • A weakly oxygenated redox state would be difficult to distinguish from oxic depositional conditions using iron speciation or trace element enrichments.

    “This redox state would be difficult to distinguish from oxic depositional conditions using iron speciation or trace element enrichments (Scholz 2018, Sperling et al. 2014)”

    From The History of Ocean Oxygenation (2022) · cites this paper as Sperling et al. 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sperling, E. A., Rooney, A. D., Hays, L., Sergeev, V. N., Vorob'eva, N. G., Sergeeva, N. D., Selby, D., Johnston, D. T., & Knoll, A. H.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
  • Geological Institute Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow Russia
  • Institute of Geology Ufimian Scientific Center Russian Academy of Sciences Ufa Russia
  • Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Sperling, E. A.
  • Knoll, A. H.
Venue
Geobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-29
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
373-386
ISSN
  • 1472-4669 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-4677
OpenAlex
W1969060008
Cited by
149
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Geobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Keywords
iron speciation, redox-sensitive elements, pyrite sulfur isotopes, total organic carbon, free oxygen, Proterozoic stratigraphy
MeSH terms
Iron, Organic Chemicals, Oxidation-Reduction, Russia, Seawater, Sulfides, Sulfur Isotopes, Trace Elements, Evolution, Planetary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review