Cited by 225Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesGambling Behavior and TreatmentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Impulsivity in abstinent early- and late-onset alcoholics: differences in self-report measures and a discounting task

Dom, G., D’haene, P., Hulstijn, W., Sabbe, B.·2006·Addiction

Abstract

AIMS: To test the hypothesis that early-onset alcoholics (EOAs) can be differentiated from late-onset alcoholics (LOAs) by more severe substance-related problems and higher levels of impulsivity and aggression. DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: A cross-sectional patient survey with a community comparison group. The European Addiction Severity Index was used to assess substance-related problems and the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, the Dutch version of the Zuckermann Sensation Seeking Scale and the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory were used to assess impulsive and aggressive traits. Impulsive decision making was assessed using a delay discounting task (DDT) with hypothetical monetary rewards. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Participants were EOAs (n = 42) and LOAs (n = 46) recruited from an addiction treatment centre and an unmatched, non-substance-abusing comparison group (n = 54). Findings The EOAs had higher levels of impulsive decision making than both the LOAs and the comparison group. The EOAs had higher scores than the LOAs on measures of impulsiveness, aggressiveness and the severity of substance-related problems. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that EOAs are more impulsive and aggressive than LOAs. Further identification of alcoholism subtypes based on dimensions of impulsivity should be considered in the light of their relationship with pharmacological and behavioural treatment interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01270.x

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dom, G., D’haene, P., Hulstijn, W., & Sabbe, B.
Corresponding author
Dom, G.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-12-16
Volume
101
Issue
1
Pages
50-59
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2016446092
Cited by
225
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 17
FWCI
7.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
early-onset alcoholism, late-onset alcoholism, impulsivity, aggression, delay discounting, impulsive decision-making, substance-related problems, alcoholism subtypes, sensation seeking, hostility, self-report measures
MeSH terms
Adult, Aggression, Alcoholism, Cross-Sectional Studies, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reward, Self-Assessment, Severity of Illness Index, Age of Onset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review