Cited by 213HIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Needle sharing in opioid-dependent outpatients: psychological processes underlying risk

Odum, Amy L, Madden, Gregory J, Badger, Gary J, Bickel, Warren K·2000·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Needle sharing contributes to the spread of the human immunodeficiency virus and other health concerns and remains a persistent problem among injection drug users. We determined whether needle sharing may be related to the discounting of the value of delayed outcomes. Outpatients in treatment for heroin dependence indicated preference for immediate versus delayed hypothetical monetary and heroin outcomes in a titration procedure that determined indifference points at various delays. The degree to which the delayed outcomes lost value was estimated with a nonlinear decay model. Participants who agreed to share a needle in a scenario (N=15) discounted delayed money more steeply than did the nonsharing group (N=17). Both groups discounted delayed heroin more steeply than delayed money. Persistent needle sharing may be related to the relative inability of delayed outcomes to impact current behavior. Training to mitigate the effect of delay on outcome value may offer reductions in needle sharing and drug abuse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0376-8716(00)00111-3

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Odum, A. L., Madden, G. J., Badger, G. J., & Bickel, W. K.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Odum, Amy L
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-11
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
259-266
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043529882
Cited by
213
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da006969-10)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32-DA-07242, R01 DA11692, R01 DA06969, R01DA011692, T32DA007242)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
needle sharing, heroin addiction, delay discounting, time preference, people who inject drugs, HIV transmission
MeSH terms
Adult, Ambulatory Care, Female, Heroin Dependence, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Personality Inventory, Risk-Taking, Substance Abuse, Intravenous, Prevalence, Needle Sharing, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review