Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 116

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sex‐specific demographic behaviours that shape human genomic variation

HEYER, E., CHAIX, R., PAVARD, S., AUSTERLITZ, F.·2012·Molecular Ecology

Abstract

In the human species, the two uniparental genetic systems (mitochondrial DNA and Y chromosome) exhibit contrasting diversity patterns. It has been proposed that sex‐specific behaviours, and in particular differences in migration rate between men and women, may explain these differences. The availability of high‐density genomic data and the comparison of genetic patterns on autosomal and sex chromosomes at global and local scales allow a reassessment of the extent to which sex‐specific behaviours shape our genome. In this article, we first review studies comparing the genetic patterns at uniparental and biparental genetic systems and assess the extent to which sex‐specific migration processes explain the differences between these genetic systems. We show that differences between male and female migration rates matter, but that they are certainly not the only contributing factor. In particular, differences in effective population size between men and women are also likely to account for these differences. Then, we present and discuss three anthropological processes that may explain sex‐specific differences in effective population size and thus human genomic variation: (i) variance in reproductive success arising from, for example, polygyny; (ii) descent rules; and (iii) transmission of reproductive success.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05406.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

1 more claim about this paper

Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.

See all claims — free account

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 95

  1. Alexander RD, 1979, Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behaviour, 402
  2. 10.1073/pnas.95.25.15140 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800779 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0162-3095(80)90005-9 · DOI
  5. 10.1186/1471-2148-7-S2-S12 · DOI
  6. Betzig LB, 1986, Despotism and Differential Reproductive Success: A Darwinian View of Human History
  7. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020122 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Borgerhoff Mulder M, 1988, Reproductive Success: Studies of Individual Variation in Contrasting Breeding Systems
  9. Borgerhoff Mulder M, 1990, Kipsigis women’s preferences for wealthy men: evidence for female choice in mammals?, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 27, 255
  10. 10.1007/s12110-009-9060-x · DOI
  11. 10.1002/evan.20088 · DOI
  12. 10.1126/science.1178336 · DOI
  13. 10.1515/9781400877140 · DOI
  14. 10.1086/204474 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1038/ng0109-8 · DOI
  16. 10.1086/425938 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Clutton‐Brock TH, 1988, Reproductive Success: Studies of Individual Variation in Contrasting Breeding Systems
  18. 10.1126/science.296.5565.69 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/nature10149 · DOI
  20. 10.1098/rspb.2009.2041 · DOI
  21. 10.1071/RD01064 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s00239-003-2458-x · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.10.021 · DOI
  24. Fisher RA, 1958, The Genetic Theory of Natural Selection
  25. Fix AG, 1976, Comments on “On natural selection and the inheritance of wealth”, Current Anthropology, 17, 616
  26. Fix AG, 1999, Migration and Colonization in Human Microevolution
  27. 10.3378/027.083.0106 · DOI
  28. 10.3378/027.083.0107 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01884.x · DOI
  30. Frankham R, 2003, Introduction to Conservation Genetics
  31. 10.1073/pnas.1007997107 · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.96.9.5077 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/0032472031000144116 · DOI
  34. Godelier M, 2004, Métamorphoses de la parenté
  35. 10.1038/ncomms1235 · DOI
  36. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000202 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/ng.651 · DOI
  38. 10.1086/202775 · DOI
  39. 10.1086/375453 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Heyer E, 2011, Comments on “The domain of the Replicators: Selection, Neutrality and Cultural Evolution” by J S Lansing and Murray P Cox, Current Anthropology, 52, 119
  41. 10.1016/j.tig.2005.02.007 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1098/rspb.2003.2535 · DOI
  43. Hrdy SB, 2009, Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding
  44. 10.1093/beheco/arq078 · DOI
  45. 10.1098/rspb.2009.0088 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.12.004 · DOI
  47. 10.1086/346065 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1093/molbev/msq117 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/ng.303 · DOI
  50. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.99033.x · DOI
  51. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1963.tb03281.x · DOI
  52. 10.1093/beheco/13.3.291 · DOI
  53. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020053 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.01.029 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.05.013 · DOI
  56. 10.1073/pnas.1100723108 · DOI
  57. 10.1073/pnas.1011553108 · DOI
  58. 10.1073/pnas.0710158105 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.jaa.2011.06.004 · DOI
  60. 10.1086/203627 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/0162-3095(91)90024-K · DOI
  62. Lynch M, 1998, Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits
  63. 10.1007/s002650050219 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00118-2 · DOI
  65. 10.1177/1069397103254008 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1086/382256 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1353/hub.2006.0056 · DOI
  68. Murdock GP, 1967, Ethnographic Atlas
  69. Murphy M, 1999, Is the relationship between fertility of parents and children really weak?, Social Biology, 46, 122
  70. 10.1073/pnas.95.15.9047 · DOI
  71. 10.1126/science.170.3960.815 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1017/S0016672300010119 · DOI
  73. 10.1086/591690 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1038/ng711 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1073/pnas.0406709102 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.2307/1533182 · DOI
  77. 10.1086/518446 · DOI
  78. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00238.x · DOI
  79. 10.1186/1479-7364-1-2-87 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1038/3088 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1006/tpbi.2002.1609 · DOI
  82. 10.1086/648530 · DOI
  83. Smouse PE, 1981, The impact of random and lineal fission of the genetic divergence of small human groups: a case study among the Yanomama, Genetics, 98, 179, 10.1093/genetics/98.1.179 · DOI · Paper page
  84. 10.1038/3012 · DOI
  85. 10.1017/CBO9781139087247.012 · DOI
  86. 10.1086/302770 · DOI · Paper page
  87. 10.3378/027.082.0204 · DOI
  88. 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00374.x · DOI
  89. 10.1086/283520 · DOI
  90. 10.1086/203674 · DOI · Paper page
  91. 10.1126/science.282.5394.1708 · DOI · Paper page
  92. 10.1038/ng1428 · DOI · Paper page
  93. 10.1093/molbev/msh214 · DOI · Paper page
  94. 10.1002/bies.20378 · DOI · Paper page
  95. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01560.x · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
HEYER, E., CHAIX, R., PAVARD, S., & AUSTERLITZ, F.
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12-29
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
597-612
ISSN
  • 0962-1083
  • 1365-294X
Cited by
116
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review