The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The 6dF Galaxy Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations and the local Hubble constant: 6dFGS: BAOs and the local Hubble constant
Open accessAbstract
We analyse the large-scale correlation function of the 6dF Galaxy Survey (6dFGS) and detect a baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) signal at 105 h−1 Mpc. The 6dFGS BAO detection allows us to constrain the distance–redshift relation at zeff= 0.106. We achieve a distance measure of DV(zeff) = 457 ± 27 Mpc and a measurement of the distance ratio, rs(zd)/DV(zeff) = 0.336 ± 0.015 (4.5 per cent precision), where rs(zd) is the sound horizon at the drag epoch zd. The low-effective redshift of 6dFGS makes it a competitive and independent alternative to Cepheids and low-z supernovae in constraining the Hubble constant. We find a Hubble constant of H0= 67 ± 3.2 km s−1 Mpc−1 (4.8 per cent precision) that depends only on the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe-7 (WMAP-7) calibration of the sound horizon and on the galaxy clustering in 6dFGS. Compared to earlier BAO studies at higher redshift, our analysis is less dependent on other cosmological parameters. The sensitivity to H0 can be used to break the degeneracy between the dark energy equation of state parameter w and H0 in the cosmic microwave background data. We determine that w=−0.97 ± 0.13, using only WMAP-7 and BAO data from both 6dFGS and Percival et al. (2010). We also discuss predictions for the large-scale correlation function of two future wide-angle surveys: the Wide field ASKAP L-band Legacy All-sky Blind surveY (WALLABY) blind H i survey (with the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder, ASKAP) and the proposed Transforming Astronomical Imaging surveys through Polychromatic Analysis of Nebulae (TAIPAN) all-southern-sky optical galaxy survey with the UK Schmidt Telescope. We find that both surveys are very likely to yield detections of the BAO peak, making WALLABY the first radio galaxy survey to do so. We also predict that TAIPAN has the potential to constrain the Hubble constant with 3 per cent precision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SEVEN-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE(WMAP) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Smith, K. M., Dunkley, J., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Nolta, M. R., Page, L., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18 · Cited by 8,802
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary
York, D., Adelman, J., Anderson, J., Anderson, S., Annis, J., Bahcall, N., Bakken, J., Barkhouser, R., Bastian, S., Berman, E., et al. (2000) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/301513 · Cited by 8,368 · cited 1×
“The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; York et al. 2000), and the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS; Colless et al. 2001) were the first redshift surveys which have directly detected the BAO signal.”
MethodFIVE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Dunkley, J., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Limon, M., Page, L., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/330 · Cited by 5,786
THE SEVENTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY
Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agüeros, M. A., Allam, S. S., Prieto, C. A., An, D., Anderson, K. S. J., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 · Cited by 5,341 · cited 1×
“The volume of the 6dF Galaxy Survey is approximately as large as the volume covered by the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey, with a sample density similar to SDSSDR7 (Abazajian et al. 2009).”
MethodThe Design and Implementation of FFTW3
Frigo, M., & Johnson, S. G. (2005) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2004.840301 · Cited by 5,086
Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
Eisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Blanton, M. R., Nichol, R. C., Scranton, R., Seo, H., Tegmark, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/466512 · Cited by 4,641 · cited 9×
“We derive the parameter (Eisenstein et al. 2005) A(zeff) = 100DV (zeff) √ Ωmh2 czeff , (27) which has no dependence on the Hubble constant since DV ∝ h−1.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFinal Results from the Hubble Space Telescope Key Project to Measure the Hubble Constant
Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Gibson, B. K., Ferrarese, L., Kelson, D. D., Sakai, S., Mould, J. R., Robert C. Kennicutt, Jr., Ford, H. C., Graham, J. A., et al. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/320638 · Cited by 3,543
Clustering in real space and in redshift space
Kaiser, N. (1987) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/227.1.1 · Cited by 2,762 · cited 1×
“The model of linear redshift space distortions introduced by Kaiser (1987) is based on the plane parallel approximation.”
MethodEisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Blanton, M. R., Nichol, R. C., Scranton, R., Seo, H., Tegmark, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2005) · Cited by 2,568
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Arnalte-Mur, 2011, MNRAS
- Sanchez, 2008, MNRAS, 390, 1470
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,006
Cosmic Dark Radiation and Neutrinos
Archidiacono, M., Giusarma, E., Hannestad, S., & Mena, O. (2013) · Advances in High Energy Physics · doi:10.1155/2013/191047 · Cited by 86
“The inclusion of external data sets (Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation [18–22] and Hubble Space Telescope measurements [23]) partially reconciles the two experiments in the framework of a ΛCDM model with additional relativistic species.”
MethodUnraveling the effective fluid approach for f ( R ) models in the subhorizon approximation
Arjona, R., Cardona, W., & Nesseris, S. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.043516 · Cited by 96
Valentino, E. D., Anchordoqui, L. A., Akarsu, Ö., Ali-Haïmoud, Y., Amendola, L., Arendse, N., Asgari, M., Ballardini, M., Basilakos, S., Battistelli, E. S., et al. (2021) · Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102607 · Cited by 85
Recombination-independent Determination of the Sound Horizon and the Hubble Constant from BAO
Pogosian, L., Zhao, G.-B., & Jedamzik, K. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abc6a8 · Cited by 86
“As all of these measurements are at z>0.6, we combine them with low-z measurements, including the BAO measurement by 6dF (Beutler et al. 2011), Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 (SDSS DR7) main Galaxy sample (MGS; Ross et al. 2015) as a complement.”
MethodInfluentialComparing early dark energy and extra radiation solutions to the Hubble tension with BBN
Seto, O., & Toda, Y. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.123501 · Cited by 86
Unified galaxy power spectrum measurements from 6dFGS, BOSS, and eBOSS
Beutler, F., & McDonald, P. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/11/031 · Cited by 86
“This agrees with [44] where wide-angle effects are discussed in appendix C.”
BackgroundSelf-citationCosmological constraints on parametrized interacting dark energy
von Marttens, R., Casarini, L., Mota, D. F., & Zimdahl, W. (2018) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2018.10.007 · Cited by 85
Interacting dark energy in a closed universe
Valentino, E. D., MELCHIORRI, A., Mena, O., Pan, S., & Yang, W. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa207 · Cited by 85
Testing coupled dark energy with large scale structure observation
Yang, W., & Xu, L. (2014) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/08/034 · Cited by 85
Constraints on ΛCDM extensions from the SPT-3G 2018 EE and TE power spectra
Balkenhol, L., Dutcher, D., Ade, P. A. R., Ahmed, Z., Anderes, E., Anderson, A. J., Archipley, M., Avva, J. S., Aylor, K., Barry, P. S., et al. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.083509 · Cited by 84
Constraints on Cosmological Parameters from the 500 deg2 SPTPOL Lensing Power Spectrum
Bianchini, F., Wu, W. L. K., Ade, P. A. R., Anderson, A. J., Austermann, J. E., Avva, J. S., Beall, J. A., Bender, A. N., Benson, B. A., Bleem, L. E., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab6082 · Cited by 84
“…Collaboration et al. 2018a); (iii) the SPTPOL CMB lensing likelihood46; (iv) the SPTPOL TEEE likelihood (Henning et al. 2018); and (v) baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO) likelihoods from BOSS DR12, SDSS MGS, and 6dFGS galaxy surveys data (Beutler et al. 2011; Ross et al. 2015; Alam et al. 2017).”
BackgroundBrans–Dicke cosmology with a Λ-term: a possible solution to ΛCDM tensions*
Solà, J., Gómez-Valent, A., Pérez, J. D. C., & Moreno-Pulido, C. (2020) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abbc43 · Cited by 95
“This dataset includes the Planck 2018 TTTEEE+lensing likelihood [3], BAO data from [141, 190, 191] and the SH0ES prior from [30].”
MethodTesting late-time cosmic acceleration with uncorrelated baryon acoustic oscillation dataset
Benisty, D., & Staicova, D. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039502 · Cited by 84
Rogers, K. K., Hložek, R., Laguë, A., Ivanov, M. M., Philcox, O. H. E., Cabass, G., Akitsu, K., & Marsh, D. J. E. (2023) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/06/023 · Cited by 111
“106 [135]; the Sloan Digital Sky Survey data release 7 Main Galaxy Sample (SDSS DR7 MGS) at z = 0.”
BackgroundCamphuis, E., Quan, W., Balkenhol, L., Khalife, A. R., Ge, F., Guidi, F., Huang, N., Lynch, G. P., Omori, Y., Trendafilova, C., et al. (2026) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/7wt3-9v2y · Cited by 84
Testing models of vacuum energy interacting with cold dark matter
Li, Y., Zhang, J., & Zhang, X. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.023002 · Cited by 84
The 2-degree Field Lensing Survey: design and clustering measurements
Blake, C., Amon, A., Childress, M. J., Erben, T., Glazebrook, K., Harnois-Déraps, J., Heymans, C., Hildebrandt, H., Hinton, S. R., Janssens, S. R., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1990 · Cited by 84
“…in this area to date have focused on mapping out the cosmic expansion history using baryon acoustic oscillations (BAOs) as a standard ruler (e.g. Beutler et al. 2011; Blake et al. 2011b, Anderson et al. 2014; Kazin et al. 2014; Aubourg et al. 2015; Delubac et al. 2015; Alam et al. 2016) and…”
MethodSelf-citationCosmology and dark energy from joint gravitational wave-GRB observationsPreprint
Belgacem, E., Dirian, Y., Foffa, S., Howell, E. J., Maggiore, M., Regimbau, T., ElemPart, S. S. T. C. A., & Physics, T. (2019) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 83
Jackson, N. J. (2015) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/lrr-2015-2 · Cited by 83
“5 The conclusion of the latter, that based on median statistics of the Huchra compilation, 𝐻0 = 67 ± 2 km s−1 Mpc−1 , is slightly scary in retrospect given the Planck value of 67.2 ± 1.3 km s−1 Mpc−1 for a flat Universe [2].”
MethodInfluentialGeneral analysis of direct dark matter detection: From microphysics to observational signatures
Dent, J. B., Krauss, L. M., Newstead, J. L., & Sabharwal, S. (2015) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.063515 · Cited by 83
nIFTy cosmology: Galaxy/halo mock catalogue comparison project on clustering statistics
Chuang, C.-H., Zhao, C., Prada, F., Munari, E., Avila, S., Izard, A., Kitaura, F.-S., Manera, M., Monaco, P., Murray, S., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1289 · Cited by 83
“Therefore, it has been widely used to study cosmic variance (and covariance matrices) in large-scale structure measurements (e.g. Cole et al. 2005; Percival et al. 2010; Reid et al. 2010; Blake et al. 2011; Beutler et al. 2011).”
MethodA model with interaction of dark components and recent observational data
Pan, S., & Sharov, G. S. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2278 · Cited by 83
Is cosmic acceleration proven by local cosmological probes?
Tutusaus, I., Lamine, B., Dupays, A., & Blanchard, A. (2017) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630289 · Cited by 83
“We use the values provided by 6dFGS [Beutler et al. (2011)], SDSS - MGS [Ross et al. (2015)], BOSS - CMASS, and LOWZ samples DR11 [Anderson et al. (2014); Tojeiro et al. (2014)] and BOSS - Lyα forest DR11 [Delubac et al. (2015); Font-Ribera et al. (2014)].”
MethodCosmological constraints on invisible neutrino decays revisited
Escudero, M., & Fairbairn, M. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.103531 · Cited by 83
Cosmological limits on the neutrino mass and lifetime
Chacko, Z., Dev, A., Du, P., Poulin, V., & Tsai, Y. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2020)020 · Cited by 83
“106 [81] and the MGS galaxy sample of SDSS at z = 0.”
BackgroundNew early dark energy is compatible with current LSS data
Niedermann, F., & Sloth, M. S. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.103537 · Cited by 82
Cosmology with the EFTofLSS and BOSS: dark energy constraints and a note on priors
Carrilho, P., Moretti, C., & Pourtsidou, A. (2023) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/01/028 · Cited by 81
“106 [90] and from the SDSS DR7 MGS at z = 0.”
BackgroundHomogeneity and isotropy in the Two Micron All Sky Survey Photometric Redshift catalogue
Alonso, D., Salvador, A. I., Sánchez, J., Bilicki, M., García-Bellido, J., & Sanchez, E. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv309 · Cited by 83
“A historically popular alternative method is to generate lognormal realizations of the galaxy density field and Poisson sample them with galaxies (Beutler et al. 2011; Blake et al. 2011).”
MethodWide-angle effects in future galaxy surveys
Yoo, J., & Seljak, U. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2491 · Cited by 83
“With fewer galaxies at large separation, the average opening angle of galaxy pairsin the SDSS is close to zero (Okumura et al. 2008; Beutler et al. 2011; Samushia et al. 2012).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRealistic cosmological scenario with nonminimal kinetic coupling
Sushkov, S. V. (2012) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.123520 · Cited by 86
Li, Y., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.123007 · Cited by 83
Impact of the cosmic variance on H0 on cosmological analyses
Camarena, D., & Marra, V. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.023537 · Cited by 83
Effects of neutrino mass hierarchies on dynamical dark energy models
Yang, W., Nunes, R. C., Pan, S., & Mota, D. F. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.103522 · Cited by 82
Quantifying dimensionality: Bayesian cosmological model complexities
Handley, W. J., & Lemos, P. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.023512 · Cited by 82
Determining the Hubble constant without the sound horizon: Measurements from galaxy surveys
Philcox, O. H. E., Sherwin, B. D., Farren, G. S., & Baxter, E. J. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.023538 · Cited by 82
Listening to the sound of dark sector interactions with gravitational wave standard sirens
Yang, W., Vagnozzi, S., Valentino, E. D., Nunes, R. C., Pan, S., & Mota, D. F. (2019) · Biblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) · Cited by 82
Dark energy–dark matter interactions as a solution to the S8 tension
Lucca, M. (2021) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2021.100899 · Cited by 82
“In order to constrain this set of parameters we consider the same cosmological data sets as in [26], namely the CMB mission Planck 2018 [3] (including the temperature, polarization and lensing likelihoods, henceforth only referred to as Planck), the BAO data gathered by the 6dF Galaxy Survey (6dFGS) [36], the Sloan Di…”
MethodDo cosmological observations allow a negative Λ?
Sen, A. A., Adil, S. A., & Sen, S. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2796 · Cited by 98
Parameter space in Galileon gravity models
Barreira, A., Li, B., Sánchez, A. G., Baugh, C. M., & Pascoli, S. (2013) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.103511 · Cited by 82
Cosmological constraints on neutrino self-interactions with a light mediator
Forastieri, F., Lattanzi, M., & Natoli, P. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.103526 · Cited by 82
Chasing the phantom: A closer look at type Ia supernovae and the dark energy equation of state
Shafer, D. L., & Dragan Huterer, A. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.063510 · Cited by 81
Strong evidence for an accelerating Universe
Haridasu, B. S., Luković, V. V., D’Agostino, R., & Vittorio, N. (2017) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730469 · Cited by 81
“To avoid correlations among different BAO data points, we used only six measurements taken from Beutler et al. (2011), Anderson et al. (2014), Ross et al. (2015), Delubac et al. (2015), Font-Ribera et al. (2014), also summarised in Table 1 of Luković et al. (2016).”
MethodBanihashemi, A., Khosravi, N., & Shirazi, A. H. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.083509 · Cited by 79
Rossi, M., Ballardini, M., Braglia, M., Finelli, F., Paoletti, D., Starobinsky, A. A., & Umiltà, C. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.103524 · Cited by 86
“[44] Florian Beutler, Chris Blake, Matthew Colless, D.”
Constraints to Dark Energy Using PADE Parameterizations
Rezaei, M., Malekjani, M., Basilakos, S., Mehrabi, A., & Mota, D. F. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7898 · Cited by 83
“Specifically, we implement a statistical analysis using the background expansion data including those of SN Ia (Suzuki et al. 2012), BAO (Beutler et al. 2011; Blake et al. 2011a; Padmanabhan et al. 2012; Anderson et al. 2013), CMB (Hinshaw et al. 2013), BBN (Burles et al. 2001; Serra et al. 2009), and Hubble data (Gaz…”
MethodInfluentialWang, B., Elcio Abdalla, A., Atrio-Barandela, F., & Pavón, D. (2024) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad2527 · Cited by 81
Cosmological constraints from baryon acoustic oscillations and clustering of large-scale structure
Addison, G. E., Hinshaw, G. F., & Halpern, M. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1687 · Cited by 81
“This could contribute to the high PTE in the case of the WiggleZ and 6dFGS data, where the lognormal method was used (Blake et al. 2011a; Beutler et al. 2011).”
MethodInfluentialOn the validity of cosmological Fisher matrix forecasts
Wolz, L., Kilbinger, M., Weller, J., & Giannantonio, T. (2012) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/09/009 · Cited by 81
Constraining interacting dark energy models with latest cosmological observations
Xia, D., & Wang, S. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2073 · Cited by 81
“The BAO data include 6dFGS (Beutler et al. 2011), SDSS MGS (Ross et al. 2015), and WiggleZ (Kazin et al. 2014).”
MethodInfluentialExploring the Tension between Current Cosmic Microwave Background and Cosmic Shear Data
Di Valentino, E., & Bridle, S. (2018) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym10110585 · Cited by 80
“75 km s−1 Mpc−1 [14]), referred as “R16”; the baryon acoustic oscillation data from 6dFGS [29], SDSS-MGS [30], BOSSLOWZ [31] and CMASS-DR11 [31] surveys as was done in [32], called “BAO”; and the Joint light-curve analysis (JLA) sample of Supernovae Type Ia comprising 740 luminosity distance measurements in the redshi…”
MethodConstraining models of f(R) gravity with Planck and WiggleZ power spectrum data
Dossett, J., Hu, B., & Parkinson, D. (2014) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/03/046 · Cited by 80
Linear growth of structure in massive bigravity
Solomon, A. R., Akrami, Y., & Koivisto, T. (2014) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/10/066 · Cited by 80
Dirian, Y., Foffa, S., Kunz, M., Maggiore, M., & Pettorino, V. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/068 · Cited by 79
Searching for dark matter-dark energy interactions: Going beyond the conformal case
van de Bruck, C., & Mifsud, J. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.023506 · Cited by 83
Phenomenology of modified gravity at recombination
Lin, M., Raveri, M., & Hu, W. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.043514 · Cited by 79
H0 tension as a hint for a transition in gravitational theory
Khosravi, N., Baghram, S., Afshordi, N., & Altamirano, N. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.103526 · Cited by 80
“106 [39], the SDSS main galaxy (MGS) at z = 0.”
BackgroundColgáin, E. Ó., Sheikh-Jabbari, M. M., & Yin, L. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.023510 · Cited by 80
Moresco, M., Jiménez, R., Verde, L., Cimatti, A., Pozzetti, L., Maraston, C., & Thomas, D. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/12/039 · Cited by 80
“Our compilation comprises the measurements obtained by 6dFGS [15], SDSS Main Galaxy Sample [16] and BOSS LOWZ and CMASS surveys [17] and is similar to the baseline BAO dataset used in Planck 2015 analysis [10].”
MethodNon-local gravity and comparison with observational datasets
Dirian, Y., Foffa, S., Kunz, M., Maggiore, M., & Pettorino, V. (2015) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/04/044 · Cited by 84
“We use as datasets the CMB data from the Planck 2013 data release [63], type-Ia supernovae from JLA [64], and BAO data from BOSS [65] and 6dF [66].”
Super-renormalizable or finite completion of the Starobinsky theory
Briscese, F., Modesto, L., & Tsujikawa, S. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.024029 · Cited by 79
Comparison of dark energy models after Planck 2015
Xu, Y.-Y., & Zhang, X. (2016) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4446-5 · Cited by 87
“(19) We use four BAO data points: rs(zd)/DV(0.106) = 0.336 ± 0.015 from the 6dF Galaxy Survey [66], DV(0.15) = (664± 25Mpc)(rd/rd,fid) from the SDSS-DR7 [67], DV(0.32) = (1264 ± 25Mpc)(rd/rd,fid) and DV(0.57) = (2056 ± 20Mpc)(rd/rd,fid) from the BOSS-DR11 [68].”
MethodInfluentialRevisit of the interacting holographic dark energy model after Planck 2015
Feng, L., & Zhang, X. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/08/072 · Cited by 90
“106 [77], the SDSS main galaxy sample (MGS) at zeff = 0.”
BackgroundDynamical dark energy: scalar fields and running vacuum
Solà, J., Gómez-Valent, A., & Pérez, J. D. C. (2016) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732317500547 · Cited by 63
Cosmological discordances. II. Hubble constant, Planck and large-scale-structure data sets
Lin, W., & Ishak, M. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.083532 · Cited by 79
“106) [49] and SDSS main galaxy sample (MGS) (zeff = 0.”
BackgroundH0 tension, swampland conjectures, and the epoch of fading dark matter
Agrawal, P., Obied, G., & Vafa, C. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.043523 · Cited by 79
The evidence of cosmic acceleration and observational constraints
Yang, Y., & Gong, Y. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/06/059 · Cited by 83
Late-transition versus smooth H(z) -deformation models for the resolution of the Hubble crisis
Alestas, G., Camarena, D., Valentino, E. D., Kazantzidis, L., Marra, V., Nesseris, S., & Perivolaropoulos, L. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.063538 · Cited by 78
“[180] Florian Beutler, Chris Blake, Matthew Colless, D.”
A New Parametrization of Hubble Parameter in f(Q)$f(Q)$ Gravity
Koussour, M., Pacif, S. K. J., Bennai, M., & Sahoo, P. K. (2023) · Fortschritte der Physik · doi:10.1002/prop.202200172 · Cited by 79
Cosmological constraints on induced gravity dark energy models
Ballardini, M., Finelli, F., Umiltà, C., & Paoletti, D. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/067 · Cited by 80
The Weak Lensing Signal and the Clustering of BOSS Galaxies I: Measurements
Miyatake, H., More, S., Mandelbaum, R., Takada, M., Spergel, D. N., Kneib, J., Schneider, D. P., Brinkmann, J., & Brownstein, J. R. (2018) · KiltHub Repository · doi:10.1184/r1/6509372.v1 · Cited by 79
Observational constraints on generalized Proca theories
De Felice, A., Heisenberg, L., & Tsujikawa, S. (2017) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.123540 · Cited by 82
“We use the BAO data from 6dFGS [65], SDSS-MGS [66], BOSS [67], BOSS CMASS [68], and Wiggle Z [69] surveys.”
Methoddos Santos, M. V., Reis, R. R. R., & Waga, I. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/02/066 · Cited by 78
Cosmological constraints on interacting light particles
Brust, C., Yanou Cui, A., & Sigurdson, K. (2017) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/08/020 · Cited by 78
Effects of anisotropic stress in interacting dark matter – dark energy scenarios
Yang, W., Pan, S., Xu, L., & Mota, D. F. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2789 · Cited by 78
Jin, S.-J., He, D.-Z., Xu, Y., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/051 · Cited by 78
“For the BAO data, we use the measurements from 6dFGS at zeff = 0.106 (Beutler et al. 2011), SDSS-MGS at zeff = 0.15 (Ross et al. 2015), and BOSS-DR12 at zeff = 0.38, 0.51, and 0.61 (Alam et al. 2017).”
MethodInfluentialMartinelli, M., Martins, C. J. A. P., Nesseris, S., Sapone, D., Tutusaus, I., Avgoustidis, A., Camera, S., Carbone, C., Casas, S., Ilić, S., et al. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039078 · Cited by 78
“(13), as well as on the Hubble distance DH(z) = c/H(z), that we consider here are provided by the surveys 6dFGS (Beutler et al. 2011), SDDS (Anderson et al. 2014), BOSS CMASS (Xu et al. 2012), WiggleZ (Blake et al. 2012), MGS (Ross et al. 2015), BOSS DR12 (Gil-Marín et al. 2016), DES (Abbott et al.…”
MethodImplication of the Hubble tension for the primordial Universe in light of recent cosmological data
Ye, G., Hu, B., & Yun-song Piao, A. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.063510 · Cited by 75
Bocquet, S., Grandis, S., Bleem, L. E., Klein, M., Mohr, J. J., Schrabback, T., Abbott, T. M. C., Ade, P. A. R., Aguena, M., Alarcon, A., et al. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.083510 · Cited by 87
Cosmic acceleration from a single fluid description
Capozzıello, S., D’Agostino, R., & Luongo, O. (2018) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2018.02.002 · Cited by 79
Review of Hubble tension solutions with new SH0ES and SPT-3G data
Khalife, A. R., Zanjani, M. B., Galli, S., Günther, S., Lesgourgues, J., & Benabed, K. (2024) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/04/059 · Cited by 80
A Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation features in the SDSS BOSS DR12 Galaxy Bispectrum
Pearson, D. W., & Samushia, L. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1266 · Cited by 77
“…currently in use would take ∼1 000 000 CPU hours since, unfortunately, the cheapest mock catalogues to produce, the lognormal mocks (Coles & Jones 1991; Beutler et al., 2011; Pearson, Samushia & Gagrani 2016), do not adequately reproduce the three-point statistics (see White et al. 2014, Figure 9).”
BackgroundObservational constraints on interacting Tsallis holographic dark energy model
Sadri, E. (2019) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7263-9 · Cited by 77
Martin, J., Ringeval, C., & Vennin, V. (2024) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101653 · Cited by 105
Clustering and halo abundances in early dark energy cosmological models
Klypin, A. A., Poulin, V., Prada, F., Primack, J. R., Kamionkowski, M., Ávila-Reese, V., Rodríguez-Puebla, A., Behroozi, P., Hellinger, D., & Smith, T. L. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab769 · Cited by 77
Anchordoqui, L. A., Valentino, E. D., Pan, S., & Yang, W. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Astrophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2021.08.001 · Cited by 76
“• BAO: Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) from different galaxy surveys: 6dFGS [2], SDSS-MGS [3], and BOSS DR12 [4].”
BackgroundCosmic slowing down of acceleration for several dark energy parametrizations
Magaña, J. A., Cárdenas, V. H., & Motta, V. (2014) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/10/017 · Cited by 77
“106 from the Six-degree-Field Galaxy Survey (6dFGS) [35].”
BackgroundCosmology and the neutrino mass ordering
Hannestad, S., & Schwetz, T. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/11/035 · Cited by 76
“We furthermore include BAO data from a variety of different surveys: 6dFGS [24], SDSS-MGS [25], BOSS-LOWZ [26] and CMASS-DR11 [27].”
MethodMULTIDARK-GALAXIES: Data release and first results
Knebe, A., Stoppacher, D., Prada, F., Behrens, C., Benson, A., Cora, S., Croton, D., Padilla, N., Ruiz, A., Sinha, M., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2662 · Cited by 50
“The vertical line indicates the position of the Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations peak (Beutler et al. 2011).”
BackgroundAll-inclusive interacting dark sector cosmologies
Yang, W., Valentino, E. D., Mena, O., Pan, S., & Nunes, R. C. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.083509 · Cited by 76
“• Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO): a number of BAO constraints from different astronomical missions are exploited, namely those from 6dFGS [49], SDSS-MGS [50], and BOSS DR12 [51] surveys, as considered by the Planck collaboration [2].”
BackgroundCan conformally coupled modified gravity solve the Hubble tension?
Adi, T., & Kovetz, E. D. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.023530 · Cited by 88
Late-time approaches to the Hubble tension deforming H(z), worsen the growth tension
Alestas, G., & Perivolaropoulos, L. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1070 · Cited by 73
Early Mass-varying Neutrino Dark Energy: Nugget Formation and Hubble Anomaly
Gogoi, A., Sharma, R. K., Chanda, P., & Das, S. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abfe5b · Cited by 76
Cosmology from CMB lensing and delensed E E power spectra using 2019–2020 SPT-3G polarization data
Ge, F., Millea, M., Camphuis, E., Daley, C., Huang, N., Omori, Y., Quan, W., Anderes, E., Anderson, A. J., Ansarinejad, B., et al. (2025) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.083534 · Cited by 76
Testing coupled dark energy models with their cosmological background evolution
van de Bruck, C., Mifsud, J., & Morrice, J. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.043513 · Cited by 76
Symmetry of Cosmological Observables, a Mirror World Dark Sector, and the Hubble Constant
Cyr-Racine, F.-Y., Ge, F., & Knox, L. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.201301 · Cited by 75
No New Cosmological Concordance with Massive Sterile Neutrinos
Leistedt, B., Peiris, H. V., & Verde, L. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.041301 · Cited by 75
Dark Matter Equation of State through Cosmic History
Kopp, M., Skordis, C., Thomas, D. B., & Ilić, S. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.221102 · Cited by 75
Constraining neutrino mass with the tomographic weak lensing bispectrum
Coulton, W., Liu, J., Madhavacheril, M., Böhm, V., & Spergel, D. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/05/043 · Cited by 63
Analysis with observational constraints in $$ \Lambda $$ Λ -cosmology in f(R, T) gravity
Nagpal, R., Pacif, S. K. J., Singh, J. K., Bamba, K., & Beesham, A. (2018) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6403-y · Cited by 77
MGCAMB with massive neutrinos and dynamical dark energy
Zucca, A., Pogosian, L., Silvestri, A., & Zhao, G. (2019) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/05/001 · Cited by 74
“To demonstrate the capabilities of this new version, we present joint constraints on the modified growth, massive neutrinos and the dark energy equation of state from the latest cosmological observations, including the Planck 2015 CMB data [32], the Joint Light Curve analysis (JLA) supernovae [33], the BAO measurement…”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Beutler, F., Blake, C., Colless, M., Jones, D. H., Staveley-Smith, L., Campbell, L., Parker, Q., Saunders, W., & Watson, F.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
- Australian Astronomical Observatory (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- Western Kentucky University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Beutler, Florian
- ORCID
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-07-25
- Volume
- 416
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3017-3032
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121951791
- Cited by
- 2,590
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 90 · 2025: 191 · 2024: 228 · 2023: 207 · 2022: 210 · 2021: 236 · 2020: 241 · 2019: 207 · 2018: 176 · 2017: 178 · 2016: 167 · 2015: 131 · 2014: 147 · 2013: 113 · 2012: 61
- FWCI
- 54.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #219
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- Australian National University
- Australian Research Council (DP0208876)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- baryon acoustic oscillations, 6dF Galaxy Survey, local Hubble constant, sound horizon, distance-redshift relation, dark energy equation of state, wallabies, taipan, radio galaxy surveys, cosmological constraints
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
