The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The 6dF Galaxy Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations and the local Hubble constant: 6dFGS: BAOs and the local Hubble constant
Open accessAbstract
We analyse the large-scale correlation function of the 6dF Galaxy Survey (6dFGS) and detect a baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) signal at 105 h−1 Mpc. The 6dFGS BAO detection allows us to constrain the distance–redshift relation at zeff= 0.106. We achieve a distance measure of DV(zeff) = 457 ± 27 Mpc and a measurement of the distance ratio, rs(zd)/DV(zeff) = 0.336 ± 0.015 (4.5 per cent precision), where rs(zd) is the sound horizon at the drag epoch zd. The low-effective redshift of 6dFGS makes it a competitive and independent alternative to Cepheids and low-z supernovae in constraining the Hubble constant. We find a Hubble constant of H0= 67 ± 3.2 km s−1 Mpc−1 (4.8 per cent precision) that depends only on the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe-7 (WMAP-7) calibration of the sound horizon and on the galaxy clustering in 6dFGS. Compared to earlier BAO studies at higher redshift, our analysis is less dependent on other cosmological parameters. The sensitivity to H0 can be used to break the degeneracy between the dark energy equation of state parameter w and H0 in the cosmic microwave background data. We determine that w=−0.97 ± 0.13, using only WMAP-7 and BAO data from both 6dFGS and Percival et al. (2010). We also discuss predictions for the large-scale correlation function of two future wide-angle surveys: the Wide field ASKAP L-band Legacy All-sky Blind surveY (WALLABY) blind H i survey (with the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder, ASKAP) and the proposed Transforming Astronomical Imaging surveys through Polychromatic Analysis of Nebulae (TAIPAN) all-southern-sky optical galaxy survey with the UK Schmidt Telescope. We find that both surveys are very likely to yield detections of the BAO peak, making WALLABY the first radio galaxy survey to do so. We also predict that TAIPAN has the potential to constrain the Hubble constant with 3 per cent precision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SEVEN-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE(WMAP) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Smith, K. M., Dunkley, J., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Nolta, M. R., Page, L., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18 · Cited by 8,802
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary
York, D., Adelman, J., Anderson, J., Anderson, S., Annis, J., Bahcall, N., Bakken, J., Barkhouser, R., Bastian, S., Berman, E., et al. (2000) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/301513 · Cited by 8,368 · cited 1×
“The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; York et al. 2000), and the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS; Colless et al. 2001) were the first redshift surveys which have directly detected the BAO signal.”
MethodFIVE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Dunkley, J., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Limon, M., Page, L., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/330 · Cited by 5,786
THE SEVENTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY
Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agüeros, M. A., Allam, S. S., Prieto, C. A., An, D., Anderson, K. S. J., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 · Cited by 5,341 · cited 1×
“The volume of the 6dF Galaxy Survey is approximately as large as the volume covered by the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey, with a sample density similar to SDSSDR7 (Abazajian et al. 2009).”
MethodThe Design and Implementation of FFTW3
Frigo, M., & Johnson, S. G. (2005) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2004.840301 · Cited by 5,086
Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
Eisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Blanton, M. R., Nichol, R. C., Scranton, R., Seo, H., Tegmark, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/466512 · Cited by 4,641 · cited 9×
“We derive the parameter (Eisenstein et al. 2005) A(zeff) = 100DV (zeff) √ Ωmh2 czeff , (27) which has no dependence on the Hubble constant since DV ∝ h−1.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFinal Results from the Hubble Space Telescope Key Project to Measure the Hubble Constant
Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Gibson, B. K., Ferrarese, L., Kelson, D. D., Sakai, S., Mould, J. R., Robert C. Kennicutt, Jr., Ford, H. C., Graham, J. A., et al. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/320638 · Cited by 3,543
Clustering in real space and in redshift space
Kaiser, N. (1987) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/227.1.1 · Cited by 2,762 · cited 1×
“The model of linear redshift space distortions introduced by Kaiser (1987) is based on the plane parallel approximation.”
MethodEisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Blanton, M. R., Nichol, R. C., Scranton, R., Seo, H., Tegmark, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2005) · Cited by 2,568
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Arnalte-Mur, 2011, MNRAS
- Sanchez, 2008, MNRAS, 390, 1470
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,006
New constraints on the distance duality relation from the local data
Lin, H.-N., Li, M.-H., & Li, X. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2062 · Cited by 40
“…(De Filippis et al. 2005; Bonamente et al. 2006), (2) by measuring the baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) signal in the galaxy power spectrum (Beutler et al. 2011; Anderson et al. 2014; Kazin et al. 2014; Delubac et al. 2015), (3) by measuring the angular size of ultra-compact radio sources…”
BackgroundQuantifying the impacts of future gravitational-wave data on constraining interacting dark energy
Li, H., He, D.-Z., Zhang, J., & Zhang, X. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/06/038 · Cited by 51
Generalized tracker quintessence models for dark energy
Ureña-López, L., & Roy, N. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.063510 · Cited by 20
Cosmological parameter estimation from large-scale structure deep learning
Pan, S., Liu, M.-X., Forero-Romero, J., Sabiu, C., Li, Z., Miao, H., & Li, X.-D. (2019) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-020-1586-3 · Cited by 35
“…of galaxy redshift surveys such as 2-Degree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS; Colless et al. (2003)), the 6-degree Field Galaxy Survey (6dFGS; Beutler et al. (2011)), the WiggleZ survey Blake et al. (2011b,a), and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; York et al. (2000); Eisenstein et al.…”
BackgroundDark energy as a critical phenomenon: a hint from Hubble tension
Banihashemi, A., Khosravi, N., & Shafieloo, A. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/06/003 · Cited by 40
Observational constraints of the modified cosmology through Barrow entropy
Asghari, M., & Sheykhi, A. (2022) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10262-8 · Cited by 48
“The following likelihoods are utilized in the MCMC method: The Planck likelihood with Planck 2018 data (containing high-l TT, TE, EE, low-l EE, low-l TT, and lensing) [82], the Planck-SZ likelihood for the Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) effect measured by Planck [88, 89], the CFHTLenS likelihood with the weak lensing data [90…”
MethodMukherjee, P., & Banerjee, N. (2022) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2022.100998 · Cited by 49
Hazra, D. K., Antony, A., & Shafieloo, A. (2022) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/063 · Cited by 40
“At z = 0.106 we use the sound horizon (at drag epoch) and distance ratio measurement from 6dF Galaxy Survey [7].”
MethodInfluentialAde, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartlett, J. G., Battaner, E., et al. (2014) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323003 · Cited by 125
Model selection applied to reconstructions of the Dark Energy
Escamilla, L. A., & Vazquez, J. A. (2023) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11404-2 · Cited by 39
Cruz, J. S., Niedermann, F., & Sloth, M. S. (2023) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/11/033 · Cited by 39
“Specifically, we include the results of the Six-Degree-Field Galactic Survey (6dFGS) [3] with a median redshift of z = 0 .”
Updating neutrino mass constraints with background measurements
Wang, D., Mena, O., Valentino, E. D., & Gariazzo, S. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.103536 · Cited by 39
Suppression without Thawing: Constraining Structure Formation and Dark Energy with Galaxy Clustering
Chen, S.-F., Ivanov, M. M., Philcox, O. H. E., & Wenzl, L. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.231001 · Cited by 39
Reconstruction of the dark matter–vacuum energy interaction
Wang, Y., Zhao, G., Wands, D., Pogosian, L., & Crittenden, R. (2015) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.103005 · Cited by 39
Nonlinear evolution of the baryon acoustic oscillation scale in alternative theories of gravity
Bellini, E., & Zumalacárregui, M. (2015) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.063522 · Cited by 39
Power-law cosmology, SN Ia, and BAO
Dolgov, A. D., Halenka, V., & Tkachev, I. I. (2014) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/10/047 · Cited by 41
Neutrino and dark radiation properties in light of recent CMB observations
Archidiacono, M., Giusarma, E., MELCHIORRI, A., & Mena, O. (2013) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.103519 · Cited by 39
Angulo, R. E., White, S. D. M., Springel, V., & Henriques, B. M. B. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu905 · Cited by 39
“…current constraints on the expansion history arise from measurements of the position of a particular feature of scale ∼ 110h−1Mpc: the Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) peak (Eisenstein et al. 2005; Cole et al. c© 2011 RAS 2005; Blake et al. 2011; Beutler et al. 2011; Anderson et al. 2012).”
BackgroundSearching for sterile neutrinos in dynamical dark energy cosmologies
Feng, L., Zhang, J., & Zhang, X. (2018) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-017-9150-3 · Cited by 44
“We use the 6dFGS sample [99], the SDSS MGS sample [100], and the LOWZ and CMASS samples of BOSS DR12 [101].”
MethodConservative cosmology: combining data with allowance for unknown systematics
Bernal, J. L., & Peacock, J. A. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/07/002 · Cited by 39
“We use BAO measurements from the following galaxy surveys: Six Degree Field Galaxy Survey (6dF) [41], the Main Galaxy Sample of Data Release 7 of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-MGS) [42], the galaxy sample of Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey Data Release 12 (BOSS DR12) [2], the Lyman-α forest autocorrelation fr…”
MethodGerardi, F., Martinelli, M., & Silvestri, A. (2019) · Leiden Repository (Leiden University) · Cited by 39
Cosmological constraints on the gravitational constant
Ballardini, M., Finelli, F., & Sapone, D. (2022) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/06/004 · Cited by 48
“61 in combination with measure from 6dF [68] at zeff = 0.”
BackgroundOn the dynamics of a dark sector coupling
Yang, W., Pan, S., Mena, O., & Valentino, E. D. (2023) · Journal of High Energy Astrophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2023.09.001 · Cited by 40
Cosmology with matter diffusion
Calogero, S., & Velten, H. (2013) · Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology) · Cited by 39
Adachi, S., Faúndez, M. A. O. A., Arnold, K., Baccigalupi, C., Barron, D. R., Beck, D., Bianchini, F., Chapman, S. C., Cheung, K., Chinone, Y., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbacd · Cited by 38
“…as well as CMB lensing power spectrum measurements (Planck Collaboration et al. 2018a; Wu et al. 2019), baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) results (Beutler et al. 2011; Ross et al. 2015; Alam et al. 2017) and Hubble constant measurements (Riess et al. 2019) to study the implications for cosmology.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGarrel, C., Pierre, M., Valageas, P., Eckert, D., Marulli, F., Veropalumbo, A., Pacaud, F., Clerc, N., Sereno, M., Umetsu, K., et al. (2021) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141204 · Cited by 38
Cosmology with fast radio bursts in the era of SKA
Zhang, J.-G., Zhao, Z.-W., Li, Y., Zhang, J.-F., Li, D., & Zhang, X. (2023) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-023-2212-9 · Cited by 38
Late-time cosmology in f ( Q , L m ) gravity: Analytical solutions and observational fits
Myrzakulov, Y., Dönmez, O., Koussour, M., Alizhanov, D., Bekchanov, S., & Rayimbaev, J. (2024) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101614 · Cited by 38
Pogosian, L., Zhao, G., & Jedamzik, K. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad7507 · Cited by 45
EXPLORING THE PROPERTIES OF MILLIARCSECOND RADIO SOURCES
Cao, S., Biesiada, M., Zheng, X., & Zhu, Z. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/806/1/66 · Cited by 38
“…the BAO data from the SDSS DR7 corresponding to z= 0.35 (Padmanabhan et al. 2012);SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey at z= 0.57 (Anderson et al. 2012);the clustering of WiggleZ survey (Blake et al. 2012) at z= 0.44, 0.60, and 0.73; and 6dFGS survey at z= 0.10 (Beutler et al. 2011).”
MethodInfluentialNew limits on coupled dark energy from Planck
Xia, J. (2013) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/11/022 · Cited by 43
Cosmic distance duality and cosmic transparency
Nair, R., Jhingan, S., & Jain, D. (2012) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/12/028 · Cited by 38
Basilakos, S., & Nesseris, S. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.123525 · Cited by 38
Power law cosmology model comparison with CMB scale information
Tutusaus, I., Lamine, B., Blanchard, A., Dupays, A., Zolnierowski, Y., Cohen-Tanugi, J., Ealet, A., Escoffier, S., Fèvre, O. C. L., Ilić, S., et al. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.103511 · Cited by 42
“In this work we follow [36] in combining the measurements of 6dFGS [37], SDSS [Main Galaxy Sample (MGS)] [38], BOSS (CMASS and LOWZ samples - Data Release 11) [21, 39] and BOSS Lyman-α forest (Data Release 11) [40, 41].”
MethodZhu, F., Padmanabhan, N., Ross, A. J., White, M. J., Percival, W. J., Ruggeri, R., Zhao, G., Wang, D., Mueller, E.-M., Burtin, E., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1955 · Cited by 38
Self-citationLensinglike tensions in the Planck legacy release
Motloch, P., & Hu, W. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.083515 · Cited by 38
Reducing the H0 tension with generalized Proca theory
Felice, A. D., Geng, C.-Q., Pookkillath, M. C., & Yin, L. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/08/038 · Cited by 38
“42 from Hubble Space Telescope (HST) observations [6], the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data from 6dF Galaxy Survey [32] and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey [33, 34].”
BackgroundMethodReconciling Hubble constant discrepancy from holographic dark energy
Dai, W.-M., Ma, Y.-Z., & He, H.-J. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.121302 · Cited by 38
Strong evidence for an accelerating Universe
Haridasu, B. S., Luković, V. V., D’Agostino, R., & Vittorio, N. (2017) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730469/pdf · Cited by 38
Jin, S.-J., Zhu, R.-Q., Wang, L.-F., Li, H., Zhang, J., & Zhang, X. (2022) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/1572-9494/ac7b76 · Cited by 40
Principal reconstructed modes of dark energy and gravity
Raveri, M., Pogosian, L., Martinelli, M., Koyama, K., Silvestri, A., & Zhao, G. (2023) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/02/061 · Cited by 38
“We also add the BAO measurement from 6dF [58].”
MethodPrecision cosmological constraints on atomic dark matter
Bansal, S., Barron, J., Curtin, D. Y., & Tsai, Y. (2023) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2023)095 · Cited by 38
“106 [37], by SDSS in Data Release 7 at z = 0 .”
BackgroundMethodThe Hubble constant tension: current status and future perspectives through new cosmological probes
Dainotti, M. G., Simone, B. D., Montani, G., Schiavone, T., & Lambiase, G. (2023) · Corfu Summer Institute School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity (CORFU) · doi:10.22323/1.436.0235 · Cited by 45
Abdalla, E., Abellán, G. F., Aboubrahim, A., Agnello, A., Akarsu, Ö., Akrami, Y., Alestas, G., Aloni, D., Amendola, L., Anchordoqui, L. A., et al. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Astrophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002 · Cited by 37
News from the Swampland — constraining string theory with astrophysics and cosmology
Schöneberg, N., Vacher, L., Dias, J. D. F., Carvalho, M. C., & Martins, C. J. A. P. (2023) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/10/039 · Cited by 41
“This combination consists of the old DR12 BAO employed in [99], namely the 6dFGS [101] at z = 0.”
MethodMoretti, C., Tsedrik, M., Carrilho, P., & Pourtsidou, A. (2023) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/12/025 · Cited by 37
“…α ∥ obtained from the same BOSS data release and also provided by [81], as well as pre-reconstruction BAO measurements at low redshift (6DF survey [84] and SDSS DR7 MGS [85]) and high redshift measurements of the Hubble factor and angular diameter distance from the Ly-α forest auto and…”
MethodHigh-redshift standard candles: predicted cosmological constraints
King, A. L., Davis, T. M., Denney, K. D., Vestergaard, M., & Watson, D. J. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu793 · Cited by 37
“The values of these two parameters from Six-degree-Field Galaxy Survey (6dfGS) (Beutler et al. 2011), SDSS (Percival et al. 2010), WiggleZ (Blake et al. 2011b), and BOSS (Anderson et al. 2012) are shown in Table 1.”
BackgroundStochastic bias of colour-selected BAO tracers by joint clustering–weak lensing analysis
Comparat, J., Jullo, E., Kneib, J., Schimd, C., Shan, H., Erben, T., Ilbert, O., Brownstein, J. R., Ealet, A., Escoffier, S., et al. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt797 · Cited by 37
“Beutler et al. (2011) provides the latest measurement at z = 0.106 on the 6dF Galaxy Survey (Jones et al. 2009) with a precision of 4.5 per cent.”
BackgroundInfluentialNeutrinos secretly converting to lighter particles to please both KATRIN and the cosmos
Farzan, Y., & Hannestad, S. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/02/058 · Cited by 37
“We have also performed the analysis with Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) data,including 6dFGS [26], SDSS-MGS [27], BOSS-LOWZ BAO [28] and CMASSDR11 [29].”
MethodTesting the distance duality relation using Type Ia supernovae and ultracompact radio sources
Li, X., & Lin, H.-N. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2810 · Cited by 37
“Ma & Corasaniti (2016) used the DL from SNe and DA from BAO to test DDR and found 5 per cent constraints in favour of its validity.”
BackgroundInfluentialTesting logarithmic corrections to R2 -exponential gravity by observational data
Odintsov, S. D., Gómez, D. S.-C., & Sharov, G. S. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.024003 · Cited by 37
Can holographic dark energy models fit the observational data?
Malekjani, M., Rezaei, M., & Akhlaghi, I. A. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.063533 · Cited by 37
Fractional Dark Matter decay: cosmological imprints and observational constraints
Xiao, L., Zhang, L., An, R., Feng, C., & Wang, B. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/01/045 · Cited by 37
“106 [96], SDSS Main Galaxy Sample (MGS) at z = 0.”
BackgroundH0 ex machina: Vacuum metamorphosis and beyond H0
Valentino, E. D., Linder, E. V., & MELCHIORRI, A. (2020) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2020.100733 · Cited by 37
A void in the Hubble tension? The end of the line for the Hubble bubble
Camarena, D., Marra, V., Sakr, Z., & Clarkson, C. (2022) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac8635 · Cited by 37
Improved cosmological constraints on the neutrino mass and lifetime
Abellán, G. F. (2023) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.1007/jhep08%282022%29076 · Cited by 37
The Carnegie Hubble ProgramPreprint
Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Scowcroft, V., Monson, A. J., Persson, S. E., Seibert, M., Rigby, J. R., Sturch, L. K., & Stetson, P. B. (2011) · Cited by 37
What can CMB observations tell us about the neutrino distribution function?
Alvey, J., Escudero, M., & Sabti, N. (2022) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/02/037 · Cited by 37
Limits on the cosmic neutrino background
Bauer, M., & Shergold, J. D. (2023) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/01/003 · Cited by 36
Rogers, K. K., & Poulin, V. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.7.l012018 · Cited by 36
CMB constraint on dark matter annihilation after Planck 2015
Kawasaki, M., Nakayama, K., & Sekiguchi, T. (2016) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.03.005 · Cited by 36
Asymmetric dark matter models in SO(10)
Nagata, N., Olive, K. A., & Zheng, J. (2017) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/02/016 · Cited by 36
Wandering in the Lyman-alpha forest: a study of dark matter-dark radiation interactions
Krall, R., Cyr-Racine, F.-Y., & Dvorkin, C. (2017) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/09/003 · Cited by 36
“ally, we use the following cosmological data sets: CMB: Planck 2015 temperature + low-‘polarization data [5]. BAO: measurements of the acoustic-scale distance ratio D V=r drag at z = 0:106 by 6dFGS [69], at z= 0:15 by SDSSMGS [70], at z= 0:32 by BOSS- LOWZ [71], and anisotropic BAO measurements at z= 0:57 by BOSS-CMAS…”
MethodNunes, R. C., & Bonilla, A. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2661 · Cited by 36
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: galaxy sample for BAO measurement
Crocce, M., Ross, A. J., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., GAZTAÑAGA, E., Elvin-Poole, J., Avila, S., Alarcon, A., Chan, K. C., Banik, N., Carretero, J., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2522 · Cited by 36
“…now been multiple detections of the BAO in redshift surveys (Percival et al. 2001; Cole et al. 2005; Eisenstein et al. 2005; Percival et al. 2010; Beutler et al. 2011; Blake et al. 2011; Delubac et al. 2015; Ross et al. 2015; Alam et al. 2017; Bautista et al. 2017; Ata et al. 2018), and it is…”
BackgroundTesting Viable f(T) Models with Current Observations
Xu, B., Yu, H., & Wu, P. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaad12 · Cited by 35
“The 6dFGS, MGS, and eBOSS DR14 give the measurements of the distance ratio at z=0.106 (Beutler et al. 2011), z=0.15 (Ross et al. 2015), and z=1.52 (Ata et al. 2018), respectively: r z D z 0.106 0.336 0.015, 36s d V = = ( ) ( ) ( ) D z r z 0.15 4.465 0.168, 37V s d = = ( ) ( ) ( ) D z r z 1.52…”
MethodInfluentialModel selection and constraints from holographic dark energy scenarios
Akhlaghi, I. A., Malekjani, M., Basilakos, S., & Haghi, H. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty903 · Cited by 36
“In order to study DE at the background and perturbation levels, we need to set up a general formalism where the background geometrical data including SnIa, baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO), cosmic microwave background (CMB) shift parameter, Hubble expansion H(z), and big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) are combined with…”
MethodInfluentialEstimating the galaxy two-point correlation function using a split random catalog
Keihänen, E., Kurki-Suonio, H., Lindholm, V., Viitanen, A., Suur-Uski, A.-S., Allevato, V., Branchini, E., Marulli, F., Norberg, P., Tavagnacco, D., et al. (2019) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935828 · Cited by 36
“…used to constrain the expansion history of the Universe in many spectroscopic galaxy samples (see e.g., Percival et al. 2010; Blake et al. 2011; Beutler et al. 2011; Anderson et al. 2012, 2014; Ross et al. 2015, 2017; Alam et al. 2017; Vargas-Magaña et al. 2018; Bautista et al. 2018; Ata et…”
BackgroundH 0 Tension and the Phantom Regime: A Case Study in Terms of an Infrared f(T) Gravity
El‐Zant, A. A., Hanafy, W. E., & Elgammal, S. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafa12 · Cited by 36
“We show this by using the observations from various independent data sets: Beutler et al. (2011) which use 6dFGS data, Kazin et al. (2014) for reconstructed WiggleZ, Ross et al. (2015) for the SDSS MGS data, Alam et al. (2017) for BOSS, , Ata et al. (2018) for eBOSS quasar data. and Abbott et al.…”
MethodOn cosmological signatures of baryons-dark energy elastic couplings
Jiménez, J. B., Bettoni, D., Figueruelo, D., & Pannia, F. A. T. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/08/020 · Cited by 36
Measuring H0 from low-z datasets
Zhang, X., & Huang, Q.-G. (2020) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-019-1504-8 · Cited by 36
Minimally modified gravity fitting Planck data better than $$\Lambda $$ CDM
Aoki, K., Felice, A. D., Shinji Mukohyama, A., Noui, K., Oliosi, M., & Pookkillath, M. C. (2020) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8291-1 · Cited by 36
“42, of the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) from 6dF Galaxy Survey [44] and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey [45, 46], and of the joint light curves (JLA) comprised of 740 type Ia supernovae [47].”
MethodInformation content of higher order galaxy correlation functions
Samushia, L., Slepian, Z. S., & Villaescusa-Navarro, F. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1199 · Cited by 36
Can small-scale baryon inhomogeneities resolve the Hubble tension? An investigation with ACT DR4
Thiele, L., Guan, Y., Hill, J. C., Kosowsky, A. B., & Spergel, D. N. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.063535 · Cited by 35
Ghosh, S., Kumar, S., & Tsai, Y. (2022) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/05/014 · Cited by 36
Valentino, E. D., Giarè, W., MELCHIORRI, A., & Silk, J. I. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad152 · Cited by 34
Pan, S., Yang, W., & Paliathanasis, A. (2020) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7832-y · Cited by 35
Can interacting dark energy with dynamical coupling resolve the Hubble tension
Yao, Y.-H., & Meng, X.-H. (2022) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2022.101165 · Cited by 35
Rubira, H., Mazoun, A., & Garny, M. (2023) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/01/034 · Cited by 35
“106 [62], SDSS at z = 0 .”
Observational constraints on axion(s) dark energy with a cosmological constant
Ruchika, R., Adil, S. A., Dutta, K., Mukherjee, A., & Sen, A. A. (2023) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2023.101199 · Cited by 35
Smoothing the H 0 tension with a phantom dynamical dark energy model
Dahmani, S., Bouali, A., Bojaddaini, I. E., Errahmani, A., & Ouali, T. (2023) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2023.101266 · Cited by 35
Confronting interacting dark radiation scenarios with cosmological data
Brinckmann, T., Chang, J. H., Du, P., & Loverde, M. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.123517 · Cited by 35
A new Om(z) diagnostic of dark energy in general relativity theory
Myrzakulov, N., Koussour, M., & Gogoi, D. J. (2023) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11794-3 · Cited by 35
Tensions with the flat ΛCDM model from high-redshift cosmography
Bargiacchi, G., Dainotti, M. G., & Capozziello, S. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2326 · Cited by 41
Rezazadeh, K., Ashoorioon, A., & Grin, D. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7b16 · Cited by 35
Dark side of the Universe after Planck data
Cheng, C., & Huang, Q.-G. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.043003 · Cited by 35
Robustness of cosmic neutrino background detection in the cosmic microwave background
Audren, B., Bellini, E., Cuesta, A. J., Gontcho, S. G. A., Julien Lesgourgues, A., Niro, V., Pellejero-Ibanez, M., Pérez-Ràfols, I., Poulin, V., Tram, T., et al. (2015) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/03/036 · Cited by 35
“[49–52].”
Interacting two-component fluid models with varying EoS parameter
Khurshudyan, M., Pourhassan, B., & Kahya, E. O. (2014) · International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics · doi:10.1142/s0219887814500613 · Cited by 35
Bonilla, A., & García-Farieta, J. E. (2019) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271819501189 · Cited by 35
Strongly lensed gravitational waves and electromagnetic signals as powerful cosmic rulers
Wei, J.-J., & Wu, X.-F. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2210 · Cited by 35
“…(SNe Ia; Perlmutter et al. 1998; Riess et al. 1998; Schmidt et al. 1998; Suzuki et al. 2012), anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation (Hinshaw et al. 2013; Planck Collaboration et al. 2016a), as well as baryon acoustic oscillations (Beutler et al. 2011; Anderson et al. 2012).”
BackgroundBrane with variable tension as a possible solution to the problem of the late cosmic acceleration
García-Aspeitia, M. A., Hernández-Almada, A., Magaña, J. A., Amante, M. H., Motta, V., & Martínez-Robles, C. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.101301 · Cited by 35
Bourboux, H. D. M. D., Dawson, K., Busca, N. G., Blomqvist, M., Agathe, V. D. S., Balland, C., Bautista, J., Guy, J., Kamble, V., Myers, A. D., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1d49 · Cited by 35
“At lower redshift (z< 2) the BAO scale has been measured using galaxies (Percival et al. 2007, 2010; Beutler et al. 2011; Blake et al. 2011; Anderson et al. 2012, 2014a, 2014b; Chuang & Wang 2012; Mehta et al. 2012; Padmanabhan et al. 2012; Xu et al. 2013; Ross et al. 2015; Alam et al. 2017;…”
MethodTsallis holographic dark energy in fractal universe
Ghaffari, S., Sadri, E., & Ziaie, A. H. (2020) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732320501072 · Cited by 35
CosmoBit: a GAMBIT module for computing cosmological observables and likelihoods
Renk, J. J., Stöcker, P., Bloor, S., Hotinli, S. C., Balázs, C., Bringmann, T., Gonzalo, T. E., Handley, W. J., Hoof, S., Howlett, C., et al. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/02/022 · Cited by 36
Sugiyama, N. S., Saito, S., Beutler, F., & Seo, H. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3725 · Cited by 35
Self-citationToward a concordance teleparallel cosmology. Part I. Background dynamics
Hashim, M., Hanafy, W. E., Golovnev, A. V., & El‐Zant, A. A. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/07/052 · Cited by 37
Touch of neutrinos on the vacuum metamorphosis: Is the H0 solution back?
Valentino, E. D., Pan, S., Yang, W., & Anchordoqui, L. A. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.123527 · Cited by 35
Stepped partially acoustic dark matter, large scale structure, and the Hubble tension
Buen-Abad, M. A., Chacko, Z., Kılıç, C., Marques-Tavares, G., & Youn, T. (2023) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep06(2023)012 · Cited by 35
“We use the following data for the MontePython scan: the Planck 2018 TT, TE, EE and lensing likelihoods [4], the BAO data from BOSS DR12 [94] and small z observations [95, 96], the Pantheon Supernova data [97], the SH0ES measurement of H0 from Ref.”
MethodModified gravity with massive neutrinos as a testable alternative cosmological model
Barreira, A., Li, B., Baugh, C. M., & Pascoli, S. (2014) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.023528 · Cited by 38
Hoshiya, K., & Toda, Y. (2023) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.043505 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Beutler, F., Blake, C., Colless, M., Jones, D. H., Staveley-Smith, L., Campbell, L., Parker, Q., Saunders, W., & Watson, F.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
- Australian Astronomical Observatory (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- Western Kentucky University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Beutler, Florian
- ORCID
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-07-25
- Volume
- 416
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3017-3032
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121951791
- Cited by
- 2,590
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 90 · 2025: 191 · 2024: 228 · 2023: 207 · 2022: 210 · 2021: 236 · 2020: 241 · 2019: 207 · 2018: 176 · 2017: 178 · 2016: 167 · 2015: 131 · 2014: 147 · 2013: 113 · 2012: 61
- FWCI
- 54.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #219
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- Australian National University
- Australian Research Council (DP0208876)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- baryon acoustic oscillations, 6dF Galaxy Survey, local Hubble constant, sound horizon, distance-redshift relation, dark energy equation of state, wallabies, taipan, radio galaxy surveys, cosmological constraints
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
