The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The 6dF Galaxy Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations and the local Hubble constant: 6dFGS: BAOs and the local Hubble constant
Open accessAbstract
We analyse the large-scale correlation function of the 6dF Galaxy Survey (6dFGS) and detect a baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) signal at 105 h−1 Mpc. The 6dFGS BAO detection allows us to constrain the distance–redshift relation at zeff= 0.106. We achieve a distance measure of DV(zeff) = 457 ± 27 Mpc and a measurement of the distance ratio, rs(zd)/DV(zeff) = 0.336 ± 0.015 (4.5 per cent precision), where rs(zd) is the sound horizon at the drag epoch zd. The low-effective redshift of 6dFGS makes it a competitive and independent alternative to Cepheids and low-z supernovae in constraining the Hubble constant. We find a Hubble constant of H0= 67 ± 3.2 km s−1 Mpc−1 (4.8 per cent precision) that depends only on the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe-7 (WMAP-7) calibration of the sound horizon and on the galaxy clustering in 6dFGS. Compared to earlier BAO studies at higher redshift, our analysis is less dependent on other cosmological parameters. The sensitivity to H0 can be used to break the degeneracy between the dark energy equation of state parameter w and H0 in the cosmic microwave background data. We determine that w=−0.97 ± 0.13, using only WMAP-7 and BAO data from both 6dFGS and Percival et al. (2010). We also discuss predictions for the large-scale correlation function of two future wide-angle surveys: the Wide field ASKAP L-band Legacy All-sky Blind surveY (WALLABY) blind H i survey (with the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder, ASKAP) and the proposed Transforming Astronomical Imaging surveys through Polychromatic Analysis of Nebulae (TAIPAN) all-southern-sky optical galaxy survey with the UK Schmidt Telescope. We find that both surveys are very likely to yield detections of the BAO peak, making WALLABY the first radio galaxy survey to do so. We also predict that TAIPAN has the potential to constrain the Hubble constant with 3 per cent precision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SEVEN-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE(WMAP) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Smith, K. M., Dunkley, J., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Nolta, M. R., Page, L., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18 · Cited by 8,802
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary
York, D., Adelman, J., Anderson, J., Anderson, S., Annis, J., Bahcall, N., Bakken, J., Barkhouser, R., Bastian, S., Berman, E., et al. (2000) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/301513 · Cited by 8,368 · cited 1×
“The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; York et al. 2000), and the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS; Colless et al. 2001) were the first redshift surveys which have directly detected the BAO signal.”
MethodFIVE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Dunkley, J., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Limon, M., Page, L., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/330 · Cited by 5,786
THE SEVENTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY
Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agüeros, M. A., Allam, S. S., Prieto, C. A., An, D., Anderson, K. S. J., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 · Cited by 5,341 · cited 1×
“The volume of the 6dF Galaxy Survey is approximately as large as the volume covered by the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey, with a sample density similar to SDSSDR7 (Abazajian et al. 2009).”
MethodThe Design and Implementation of FFTW3
Frigo, M., & Johnson, S. G. (2005) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2004.840301 · Cited by 5,086
Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
Eisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Blanton, M. R., Nichol, R. C., Scranton, R., Seo, H., Tegmark, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/466512 · Cited by 4,641 · cited 9×
“We derive the parameter (Eisenstein et al. 2005) A(zeff) = 100DV (zeff) √ Ωmh2 czeff , (27) which has no dependence on the Hubble constant since DV ∝ h−1.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFinal Results from the Hubble Space Telescope Key Project to Measure the Hubble Constant
Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Gibson, B. K., Ferrarese, L., Kelson, D. D., Sakai, S., Mould, J. R., Robert C. Kennicutt, Jr., Ford, H. C., Graham, J. A., et al. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/320638 · Cited by 3,543
Clustering in real space and in redshift space
Kaiser, N. (1987) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/227.1.1 · Cited by 2,762 · cited 1×
“The model of linear redshift space distortions introduced by Kaiser (1987) is based on the plane parallel approximation.”
MethodEisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Blanton, M. R., Nichol, R. C., Scranton, R., Seo, H., Tegmark, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2005) · Cited by 2,568
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Arnalte-Mur, 2011, MNRAS
- Sanchez, 2008, MNRAS, 390, 1470
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,006
Qi, J.-Z., Cao, S., Zheng, C., Pan, Y., Li, Z., Li, J., & Liu, T. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.063507 · Cited by 46
Bachega, R. R. A., Costa, A. A., Abdalla, E., & Fornazier, K. S. F. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/021 · Cited by 46
Hints of dark energy anisotropic stress using machine learning
Arjona, R., & Nesseris, S. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/11/042 · Cited by 48
“We use the BAO data from 6dFGS [79], SDDS [74], BOSS CMASS [80], WiggleZ [73], MGS [81] and BOSS DR12 [82], DES [83], Lya [84], DR-14 LRG [85] and quasars [86].”
Gravitational-wave detector networks: standard sirens on cosmology and modified gravity theory
Yang, T. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/044 · Cited by 36
The SAMI Galaxy Survey: stellar population and structural trends across the Fundamental Plane
D’Eugenio, F., Colless, M., Scott, N., van der Wel, A., Davies, R. L., van de Sande, J., Sweet, S. M., Oh, S., Groves, B. A., Sharp, R., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1146 · Cited by 46
Self-citationHotchkiss, S., Nadathur, S., Gottlöber, S., Iliev, I. T., Knebe, A., Watson, W. A., & Yepes, G. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2072 · Cited by 45
“1 IN T RO D U C T I O N An impressive array of observational evidence (e.g. Percival et al. 2010; Beutler et al. 2011; Blake et al. 2011; Anderson et al. 2013; Hinshaw et al. 2013; Planck Collaboration XVI 2014c; Sievers et al. 2013; Hou et al. 2014) has led to the cold dark matter ( CDM) model of…”
BackgroundCosmological Surveys with the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder
Duffy, A. R., Moss, A., & Staveley‐Smith, L. (2012) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1071/as11013 · Cited by 45
“4 we compare WALLABY with 7In Beutler et al. (2011) they also predict that the BAO peak is marginally detectable in the correlation function using WALLABY, at 2.1±0.7σ which is in agreement with our estimate an existing optical based measurement of the matter power spectrum from 2dF, the two error…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationBenson, A. J. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1630 · Cited by 45
“…Specifically the chains combining constraints from WMAP-9, SPT (Keisler et al. 2011), ACT (Das et al. 2011), SNLS3 (Sullivan et al. 2011), BAO (Beutler et al. 2011; Padmanabhan et al. 2012; Anderson et al. 2012; Blake et al. 2012), and H0 (Riess et al. 2011; Freedman et al. 2012): c© 0000…”
BackgroundAssessment of the cosmic distance duality relation using Gaussian process
Mukherjee, P., & Mukherjee, A. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1054 · Cited by 45
Cosmological constraints on first-order phase transitions
Yang Bai, A., & Korwar, M. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.095015 · Cited by 45
BAO vs. SN evidence for evolving dark energy
Notari, A., Michele Redi, B., & Tesi, A. (2025) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/048 · Cited by 45
“106 [24], SDSS MGS at z = 0 .”
Strong Planck constraints on braneworld and non-commutative inflation
Calcagni, G., Kuroyanagi, S., Ohashi, J., & Tsujikawa, S. (2014) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/03/052 · Cited by 45
“J C A P 0 3 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 0 5 2 In figure 1, we plot the observational contours in the (ns, r) plane derived by the joint data analysis of Planck+WP+BAO+high-ℓ.”
MethodInfluentialCabass, G., Valentino, E. D., MELCHIORRI, A., Pajer, E., & Silk, J. I. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.023523 · Cited by 45
Cold dark matter plus not-so-clumpy dark relics
Diamanti, R., Ando, S., Gariazzo, S., Mena, O., & Weniger, C. (2017) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/06/008 · Cited by 45
“We also consider the BAO measurements from several experiments: from 6dFGS [87] at redshift z = 0.”
MethodDistinguishing between neutrinos and time-varying dark energy through cosmic time
Lorenz, C. S., Calabrese, E., & Alonso, D. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.043510 · Cited by 45
Unified dark energy and dark matter from dynamical spacetime
Benisty, D., & Guendelman, E. I. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.023506 · Cited by 45
Neutron star merger GW170817 strongly constrains doubly coupled bigravity
Akrami, Y., Brax, P., Davis, A.-C., & Vardanyan, V. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.124010 · Cited by 45
“[114] Florian Beutler, Chris Blake, Matthew Colless, D.”
Gerardi, F., Martinelli, M., & Silvestri, A. (2019) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/042 · Cited by 56
“We use the following datasets: the JLA (’Joint Light-curve Analysis’) dataset [50], that unifies Type Ia SNe observations of SDSS-II (Sloan Digital Sky Survey) [51] and SNLS (Supernova Legacy Survey) [52] collaborations, for a total of 740 Type Ia SNe up to redshift z ∼ 1; the 6dFGS (6dF Galaxy Survey) [53] and SDSS D…”
MethodVerde, L., Bellini, E., Pigozzo, C., Heavens, A., & Jiménez, R. (2017) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/04/023 · Cited by 45
“5 Mpc (using JLA type IA SNe data [13], BAO DV /rs measurements [12, 14, 15] and the Hubble constant H0 determination of Ref.”
Probing dark matter with future CMB measurements
Cang, J., Gao, Y., & Ma, Y.-Z. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.103005 · Cited by 45
Zhang, J., Dong, H.-Y., Qi, J.-Z., & Zhang, X. (2020) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7767-3 · Cited by 45
Self-interacting dark matter from late decays and the H0 tension
Hryczuk, A., & Jodłowski, K. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.043024 · Cited by 45
Zhao, G., Wang, Y., Taruya, A., Zhang, W., Gil-Marín, H., de Mattia, A., Ross, A. J., Raichoor, A., Zhao, C., Percival, W. J., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab849 · Cited by 45
Cannibalism hinders growth: Cannibal Dark Matter and the S8 tension
Heimersheim, S., Schöneberg, N., Hooper, D. C., & Julien Lesgourgues, A. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/12/016 · Cited by 45
“We add the BAO data from data release 12 of SDSS, [8] as well as that of the 6DF survey [6], and the main galaxy sample of data release 7 of SDSS [7].”
MethodStöcker, P., Balázs, C., Bloor, S., Bringmann, T., Gonzalo, T. E., Handley, W. J., Hotinli, S. C., Howlett, C., Kahlhoefer, F., Renk, J. J., et al. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.123508 · Cited by 45
Hints of dark matter-neutrino interactions in Lyman- α data
Hooper, D. C., & Lucca, M. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.103504 · Cited by 45
Dark matter properties through cosmic history
Ilić, S., Kopp, M., Skordis, C., & Thomas, D. B. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.043520 · Cited by 44
Arnold, C., Li, B., Giblin, B., Harnois-Déraps, J., & Cai, Y.-C. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1091 · Cited by 44
Dossett, J. N., Ishak, M., Parkinson, D., & Davis, T. M. (2015) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.023003 · Cited by 44
Cosmological investigations of (extended) nonlinear massive gravity schemes with nonminimal coupling
Bamba, K., Hossain, M. W., Myrzakulov, R., Nojiri, S., & Sami, M. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.083518 · Cited by 44
Sterile neutrinos with pseudoscalar self-interactions and cosmology
Archidiacono, M., Hannestad, S., Hansen, R. S. L., & Tram, T. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.045004 · Cited by 44
2MTF – V. Cosmography, β, and the residual bulk flow
Springob, C. M., Hong, T., Staveley‐Smith, L., Masters, K. L., Macri, L. M., Koribalski, B. S., Jones, D. H. P., Jarrett, T. H., Magoulas, C., & Erdoğdu, P. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2648 · Cited by 44
“Beutler also considers anH0 prior of 67± 3.2 km s−1Mpc−1 as taken from Beutler et al. (2011), from which the authors deriveΩm = 0.279 ± 0.028 and b = 1.52 ± 0.29.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationMeasuring Baryon Acoustic Oscillations with Angular Two-Point Correlation Function
Alcaniz, J. S., Carvalho, G. C., Bernui, A., Carvalho, J. C., & Benetti, M. (2017) · Fundamental theories of physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51700-1_2 · Cited by 44
Chudaykin, A., Gorbunov, D. S., & Tkachev, I. I. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.083508 · Cited by 44
Updated observational constraints on quintessence dark energy models
Durrive, J., Ooba, J., Ichiki, K., & Sugiyama, N. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.043503 · Cited by 31
Revisiting Metastable Dark Energy and Tensions in the Estimation of Cosmological Parameters
Li, X., Shafieloo, A., Sahni, V., & Starobinsky, A. A. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab535d · Cited by 46
“…lower redshift BAO observations, we turn to the latest measurements of acoustic-scale distance ratio from the 6-degree Field Galaxy Survey (6dFGS) (Beutler et al. 2011), the SDSS Data Release 7 Main Galaxy sample (MGS) (Ross et al. 2015), the BOSS DR12 galaxies (Alam et al. 2017a) and the eBOSS…”
MethodCosmic Expansion History from Line-Intensity Mapping
Bernal, J. L., Breysse, P. C., & Kovetz, E. D. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.251301 · Cited by 44
“…from the 68% confidence-level region using thin solid lines. using uniform priors and the following data 3 : the local measurement of H 0 [6]; Type-Ia supernovae (SNeIa) [11]; BAO from galaxies [10, 45–48], quasars [34] and the Lyman-α forest [35, 36]; and r s measured from 2018 Planck data [7].”
Exploring neutrino mass and mass hierarchy in interacting dark energy models
Feng, L., Li, H.-L., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. (2019) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-019-9431-9 · Cited by 44
Testing interacting dark matter and dark energy model with cosmological data
Cheng, G., Ma, Y.-Z., Wu, F., Zhang, J., & Chen, X. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.043517 · Cited by 44
Adams, C., & Blake, C. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa845 · Cited by 44
“We draw our galaxy redshift sample from that used in the 6dFGS baryon acoustic oscillation analysis by Beutler et al. (2011), which selected galaxies from 6dFGSz that had magnitude K ≤ 12.9 in sky regions with greater than 60% completeness, producing a total of 75,117 galaxies.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationConstraints on dark matter annihilation from CMB observations before Planck
Lopez Honorez, L., Mena, O., Palomarez-Ruiz, S., & Vincent, A. C. (2013) · Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) · Cited by 44
Unbiased methods for removing systematics from galaxy clustering measurements
Elsner, F., Leistedt, B., & Peiris, H. V. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2777 · Cited by 44
“…Peebles & Hauser 1974; Hermit et al. 1996; Blake & Wall 2002; Zehavi et al. 2002; Tegmark et al. 2004; E-mail: f.elsner@ucl.ac.uk Eisenstein et al. 2005; Padmanabhan et al. 2007; Percival et al. 2010; Reid et al. 2010; Beutler et al. 2011; Wake et al. 2011; Busca et al. 2013; Crocce et al. 2015).”
BackgroundHow to relax the cosmological neutrino mass bound
Oldengott, I. M., Barenboim, G., Kahlen, S., Salvadó, J., & Schwarz, D. J. (2019) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/04/049 · Cited by 43
“TT+lowP+BAO: same as above plus measurements of the baryon acoustic oscillation peak scale as measured by 6DF [48], BOSS LOWZ and CMASS [49, 50], and the SDSS Main Galaxy Sample [51].”
MethodCosmological inference from the EFTofLSS: the eBOSS QSO full-shape analysis
Simon, T., Zhang, P., & Poulin, V. (2023) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/07/041 · Cited by 43
“15 [7, 88, 89], and the joint constraints from eBOSS DR144 Ly-α absorption autocorrelation at z = 2.”
BackgroundInflation model constraints from data released in 2015
Huang, Q.-G., Wang, K., & Wang, S. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.103516 · Cited by 46
Bayesian evidences for dark energy models in light of current observational data
Lonappan, A. I., Kumar, S., Ruchika, R., Dinda, B. R., & Sen, A. A. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.043524 · Cited by 47
Dark Energy Survey Year-1 results: galaxy mock catalogues for BAO
Avila, S., Crocce, M., Ross, A. J., García-Bellido, J., Percival, W. J., Banik, N., Camacho, H., Kokron, N., Chan, K. C., Andrade-Oliveira, F., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1389 · Cited by 43
“…been performed by spectroscopic galaxy surveys, able to estimate radial positions with great accuracy (Cole et al. 2005; Eisenstein et al. 2005; Beutler et al. 2011; Blake et al. 2011; Ross et al. 2017b; Ata et al. 2017; Bautista et al. 2017), the size and depth of the Dark Energy Survey1…”
BackgroundCosmology with Gravitational Wave/Fast Radio Burst Associations
Wei, J.-J., Wu, X.-F., & Gao, H. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aac8e2 · Cited by 43
“…of various electromagnetic (EM) waves, such as cosmic microwave background anisotropies (Hinshaw et al. 2013; Planck Collaboration et al. 2016), Type Ia supernovae (Perlmutter et al. 1998; Riess et al. 1998), baryon acoustic oscillations (Beutler et al. 2011; Anderson et al. 2012), and so on.”
BackgroundPhysical properties of class I compact star model for linear and Starobinsky − f ( R , T ) functions
Singh, K. N., Maurya, S. K., Errehymy, A., Farook Rahaman, A., & Mohammed Daoud, A. (2020) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2020.100620 · Cited by 43
Chitham, J. I., Comparat, J., Finoguenov, A., Clerc, N., Kirkpatrick, C. C., Damsted, S., Kukkola, A. E., Capasso, R., Nandra, K., Merloni, A., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3044 · Cited by 43
“…that excluding λ̃DES < 30 systems, systematically shifts the posterior distribution of Ωm0 closer to that constrained by other cosmological probes (Beutler et al. 2011; Ross et al. 2015; Alam et al. 2017; Scolnic et al. 2018), indicating the presence of unknown effects related to low-richness…”
BackgroundTesting gravity on cosmic scales: A case study of Jordan-Brans-Dicke theory
Joudaki, S., Ferreira, P. G., Lima, N. A., & Winther, H. A. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.043522 · Cited by 46
Dine-Fischler-Srednicki-Zhitnitsky axion in the CMB
Ferreira, R. Z., Notari, A., & Rompineve, F. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.063524 · Cited by 43
Galli, S., Pogosian, L., Jedamzik, K., & Balkenhol, L. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.023513 · Cited by 42
Koussour, M., Shekh, S. H., Govender, M., & Bennai, M. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Astrophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.11.002 · Cited by 42
Neutrino mass bounds from DESI 2024 are relaxed by Planck PR4 and cosmological supernovae
Allali, I. J., & Notari, A. (2024) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/12/020 · Cited by 42
“Using the most recent eBOSS DR16 measurements from SDSS [5] (in combination with 6DFGS [25] and older data from SDSS) the bound is substantially weaker: m ν 0 .”
Poulin, V., Smith, T. L., Calderón, R., & Simon, T. (2025) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.083552 · Cited by 52
Redshift drift exploration for interacting dark energy
Geng, J.-J., Li, Y.-H., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. (2015) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3581-8 · Cited by 42
(Lack of) Cosmological evidence for dark radiation after Planck
Verde, L., Feeney, S. M., Mortlock, D. J., & Peiris, H. V. (2013) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/09/013 · Cited by 42
“While in some cases the priors can be physically motivated, this is not always possible; in the latter case, the Bayesian answer to the model comparison question calculated with specific prior choices cannot be considered definitive.”
BackgroundCao, S., & Zhu, Z. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.083006 · Cited by 43
Nonlocal teleparallel cosmology
Bahamonde, S., Capozzıello, S., Faizal, M., & Nunes, R. C. (2017) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5210-1 · Cited by 42
Zhao, M.-M., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. (2018) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.02.042 · Cited by 44
Guo, J.-J., Zhang, J.-F., Li, Y.-H., He, D.-Z., & Zhang, X. (2018) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-017-9131-9 · Cited by 44
Investigating the Hubble Constant Tension: Two Numbers in the Standard Cosmological Model
Lin, W., Mack, K. J., & Hou, L. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abc894 · Cited by 42
“Galaxy BAOs consist of measurements at zeff=0.106 (Beutler et al. 2011), 0.15 (Ross et al. 2015), 0.38, 0.51, 0.61 (Alam et al. 2017), and 1.52 (Ata et al. 2018).”
InfluentialMetastable dark energy models in light of Planck 2018 data: Alleviating the H0 tension
Yang, W., Valentino, E. D., Pan, S., Basilakos, S., & Paliathanasis, A. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.063503 · Cited by 43
“[188] F.”
MethodInfluentialDynamical dark sectors and neutrino masses and abundances
Yang, W., Valentino, E. D., Mena, O., & Pan, S. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.023535 · Cited by 42
“• Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO): we make use of several BAO measurements from different cosmological observations, as considered by the Planck collaboration [67]: 6dFGS [70], SDSSMGS [71], and BOSS DR12 [72] surveys.”
MethodReconstruction of the neutrino mass as a function of redshift
Lorenz, C. S., Funcke, L., Löffler, M., & Calabrese, E. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.123518 · Cited by 42
“) BAO: We use BAO from 6dF [127], the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) DR7 Main Galaxy Sample (MGS) [128] and the SDSS Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) twelfth data release (DR12) [129].”
Thermal WIMPs and the scale of new physics
Athron, P., Kozar, N., Balazs, C., Beniwal, A., Bloor, S., Bringmann, T., Brod, J., Chang, C., Cornell, J. M., Farmer, B., et al. (2021) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09712-6 · Cited by 41
Multi-interacting dark energy and its cosmological implications
Lucca, M. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.083510 · Cited by 46
“In particular, we adopt the same baseline combination of probes which relies on data from Planck 2018 [2] (temperature, polarization and lensing likelihoods), the 6dF Galaxy Survey (6dFGS) [52], the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) [53, 54] and the SNIa Pantheon catal…”
MethodViscous cosmology in the Weyl-type f(Q, T) gravity
Gadbail, G. N., Arora, S., & Sahoo, P. K. (2021) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09889-w · Cited by 42
SIMULTANEOUS CONSTRAINTS ON THE NUMBER AND MASS OF RELATIVISTIC SPECIES
Riemer–Sørensen, S., Parkinson, D., Davis, T. M., & Blake, C. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/763/2/89 · Cited by 41
“BAO: The BAO scale measured at z = 0.106 (rs/DV = 0.336 ± 0.015) from the Six Degree Field Galaxy Survey (6dFGS) (Beutler et al. 2011), the reconstructed value at z = 0.35 (rs/DV = 0.1126 ± 0.0022) from Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Luminous Red Galaxies (LRG) (Padmanabhan et al. 2012), and z =…”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationReturn of Harrison–Zeldovich spectrum in light of recent cosmological tensions
Jiang, J.-Q., Ye, G., & Yun-song Piao, A. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad137 · Cited by 43
Li, T.-N., Jin, S.-J., Li, H., Zhang, J., & Zhang, X. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1bc9 · Cited by 47
Cosmology with varying fundamental constants from hyperlight, coupled scalars
Baryakhtar, M., Simon, O., & Weiner, Z. J. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.083505 · Cited by 42
Quintessence with Yukawa interaction
Costa, A. A., Olivari, L. C., & Elcio Abdalla, A. (2015) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.103501 · Cited by 41
Distance priors from Planck 2015 data
Huang, Q.-G., Wang, K., & Wang, S. (2015) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/12/022 · Cited by 41
Measuring baryon acoustic oscillations from the clustering of voids
Liang, Y., Zhao, C., Chuang, C.-H., Kitaura, F.-S., & TAO, C. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw884 · Cited by 41
“The BAO signal has been improved by further SDSS measurements and other galaxy redshift surveys (Eisenstein et al. 2005b; Percival et al. 2010; Blake et al. 2011; Beutler et al. 2011; ?”
MethodMeasuring the 2D baryon acoustic oscillation signal of galaxies in WiggleZ: cosmological constraints
Hinton, S. R., Kazin, E. A., Davis, T. M., Blake, C., Brough, S., Colless, M., Couch, W. J., Drinkwater, M. J., Glazebrook, K., Jurek, R. J., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2725 · Cited by 41
“We model the BAO peak smoothing caused by displacement of matter due to bulk flows with a smoothing parameter (Crocce & Scoccimarro 2008; Sánchez et al. 2008, 2009; Blake et al. 2011b; Beutler et al. 2011).”
MethodSelf-citationWang, S., Wang, Y., & Xia, D. (2018) · Chinese Physics C · doi:10.1088/1674-1137/42/6/065103 · Cited by 41
The BINGO telescope: a new instrument exploring the new 21 cm cosmology window
Wuensche, C. A. (2019) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1269/1/012002 · Cited by 41
Observational constraints on cosmological models with Chaplygin gas and quadratic equation of state
Sharov, G. S. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/06/023 · Cited by 41
“[25] [9, 24] [10] [32] [33] [22] [29] [18] [21] [27, 28, 31] [26] rs(zd) 147.”
Fung, L. W. H., Li, L., Liu, T., Luu, H. N., Qiu, Y.-C., & Tye, S.-H. H. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/08/057 · Cited by 41
“Also, Hart & Chluba used a combined set of only low-z BAO data: 6dF [57] + MGS [58] + BOSS DR12 [65], which leads to a different constraint on rdh compared to Eq.”
MethodCosmology beyond BAO from the 3D distribution of the Lyman-α forest
Cuceu, A., Font-Ribera, A., Joachimi, B., & Nadathur, S. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1999 · Cited by 41
Using dark energy to suppress power at small scales
Kunz, M., Nesseris, S., & Sawicki, I. (2015) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.063006 · Cited by 41
Revisiting CMB constraints on dark matter annihilation
Kawasaki, M., Nakatsuka, H., Nakayama, K., & Sekiguchi, T. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/12/015 · Cited by 40
An axially symmetric transitioning models with observational constraints
Bhardwaj, V. K., Dixit, A., Rani, R., Goswami, G. K., & Pradhan, A. (2022) · Chinese Journal of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.cjph.2022.09.007 · Cited by 40
Massive neutrino self-interactions and inflation
Choudhury, S. R., Hannestad, S., & Tram, T. (2022) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/10/018 · Cited by 40
“In addition to the CMB power spectra, we use an additional dataset combination which consists of Planck 2018 CMB lensing [50], BAO and RSD measurements from SDSS-III BOSS DR12 [51], additional BAO measurements from MGS [52] and 6dFGS [53], and SNe Ia luminosity distance measurements from the Pantheon sample [54].”
MethodMiao, H., Gong, Y., Chen, X., Huang, Z., Li, X.-D., & Zhan, H. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3583 · Cited by 40
“Based on a variety of observations in the past two decades (Percival et al. 2010; Eisenstein et al. 2011; Komatsu et al. 2011; Beutler et al. 2011; Sievers et al. 2013; Hinshaw et al. 2013; Hou et al. 2014; Planck Collaboration et al. 2014),we have entered the era of precision cosmology, and…”
BackgroundCosmological tests of parametrization q = α − β H in f(Q) FLRW cosmology
Bouali, A., Shukla, B. K., Chaudhary, H., Tiwari, R. K., Samar, M., & Mustafa, G. (2023) · International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics · doi:10.1142/s0219887823501529 · Cited by 40
Khurana, M., Chaudhary, H., Mumtaz, S., Pacif, S. K. J., & Mustafa, G. (2023) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2023.101408 · Cited by 40
Sailer, N., Kim, J., Ferraro, S., Madhavacheril, M. S., White, M. J., Abril-Cabezas, I., Aguilar, J., Ahlen, S. P., Bond, J. R., Brooks, D., et al. (2025) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/06/008 · Cited by 40
Parametrized modified gravity constraints after Planck
Hu, B., Liguori, M., Bartolo, N., & Matarrese, S. (2013) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.123514 · Cited by 38
Interacting viscous dark fluids
Avelino, A., Leyva, Y., & Ureña-López, L. (2013) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.123004 · Cited by 33
Kuroyanagi, S., Tsujikawa, S., Chiba, T., & Sugiyama, N. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.063513 · Cited by 40
Growth of matter perturbations in clustered holographic dark energy cosmologies
Mehrabi, A., Basilakos, S., Malekjani, M., & Davari, Z. (2015) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.123513 · Cited by 41
The galaxy–halo connection in the VIDEO survey at 0.5 <z< 1.7
Hatfield, P., Lindsay, S., Jarvis, M. J., Häußler, B., Vaccari, M., & Verma, A. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw769 · Cited by 40
“Therefore, when fitting the correlation functions, we treat the constraint as part of the model and fit data to the theoretical observed function, as in Beutler et al. (2011).”
MethodUnbiased pseudo-Cℓpower spectrum estimation with mode projection
Elsner, F., Leistedt, B., & Peiris, H. V. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2752 · Cited by 40
“…et al. (1996); Norberg et al. (2001); Blake & Wall (2002); Zehavi et al. (2002); Tegmark et al. (2004); Croom et al. (2005); Eisenstein et al. (2005); Coil et al. (2008); Reid et al. (2010); Beutler et al. (2011); Kim et al. (2014); Crocce et al. (2016) for constraints on galaxy clustering.”
Weigel, A. K., Schawinski, K., Čaplar, N., Wong, O. I., Treister, E., & Trakhtenbrot, B. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa803b · Cited by 44
“Photometric and spectroscopic redshifts for EMU will be provided by SkyMapper (Keller et al. 2007), WALLABY (Koribalski 2012) and TAIPAN (Beutler et al. 2011).”
MethodModel-independent constraints on Lorentz invariance violation via the cosmographic approach
Zou, X.-B., Deng, H.-K., Yin, Z.-Y., & Wei, H. (2017) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.11.053 · Cited by 40
Measurement of Hubble constant with stellar-mass binary black holes
Nishizawa, A. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.101303 · Cited by 40
Power spectrum multipoles on the curved sky: an application to the 6-degree Field Galaxy Survey
Blake, C., Carter, P., & Koda, J. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1814 · Cited by 40
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Beutler, F., Blake, C., Colless, M., Jones, D. H., Staveley-Smith, L., Campbell, L., Parker, Q., Saunders, W., & Watson, F.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
- Australian Astronomical Observatory (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- Western Kentucky University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Beutler, Florian
- ORCID
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-07-25
- Volume
- 416
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3017-3032
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121951791
- Cited by
- 2,590
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 90 · 2025: 191 · 2024: 228 · 2023: 207 · 2022: 210 · 2021: 236 · 2020: 241 · 2019: 207 · 2018: 176 · 2017: 178 · 2016: 167 · 2015: 131 · 2014: 147 · 2013: 113 · 2012: 61
- FWCI
- 54.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #219
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- Australian National University
- Australian Research Council (DP0208876)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- baryon acoustic oscillations, 6dF Galaxy Survey, local Hubble constant, sound horizon, distance-redshift relation, dark energy equation of state, wallabies, taipan, radio galaxy surveys, cosmological constraints
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review