The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The 6dF Galaxy Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations and the local Hubble constant: 6dFGS: BAOs and the local Hubble constant
Open accessAbstract
We analyse the large-scale correlation function of the 6dF Galaxy Survey (6dFGS) and detect a baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) signal at 105 h−1 Mpc. The 6dFGS BAO detection allows us to constrain the distance–redshift relation at zeff= 0.106. We achieve a distance measure of DV(zeff) = 457 ± 27 Mpc and a measurement of the distance ratio, rs(zd)/DV(zeff) = 0.336 ± 0.015 (4.5 per cent precision), where rs(zd) is the sound horizon at the drag epoch zd. The low-effective redshift of 6dFGS makes it a competitive and independent alternative to Cepheids and low-z supernovae in constraining the Hubble constant. We find a Hubble constant of H0= 67 ± 3.2 km s−1 Mpc−1 (4.8 per cent precision) that depends only on the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe-7 (WMAP-7) calibration of the sound horizon and on the galaxy clustering in 6dFGS. Compared to earlier BAO studies at higher redshift, our analysis is less dependent on other cosmological parameters. The sensitivity to H0 can be used to break the degeneracy between the dark energy equation of state parameter w and H0 in the cosmic microwave background data. We determine that w=−0.97 ± 0.13, using only WMAP-7 and BAO data from both 6dFGS and Percival et al. (2010). We also discuss predictions for the large-scale correlation function of two future wide-angle surveys: the Wide field ASKAP L-band Legacy All-sky Blind surveY (WALLABY) blind H i survey (with the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder, ASKAP) and the proposed Transforming Astronomical Imaging surveys through Polychromatic Analysis of Nebulae (TAIPAN) all-southern-sky optical galaxy survey with the UK Schmidt Telescope. We find that both surveys are very likely to yield detections of the BAO peak, making WALLABY the first radio galaxy survey to do so. We also predict that TAIPAN has the potential to constrain the Hubble constant with 3 per cent precision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SEVEN-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE(WMAP) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Smith, K. M., Dunkley, J., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Nolta, M. R., Page, L., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18 · Cited by 8,802
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary
York, D., Adelman, J., Anderson, J., Anderson, S., Annis, J., Bahcall, N., Bakken, J., Barkhouser, R., Bastian, S., Berman, E., et al. (2000) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/301513 · Cited by 8,368 · cited 1×
“The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; York et al. 2000), and the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS; Colless et al. 2001) were the first redshift surveys which have directly detected the BAO signal.”
MethodFIVE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Dunkley, J., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Limon, M., Page, L., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/330 · Cited by 5,786
THE SEVENTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY
Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agüeros, M. A., Allam, S. S., Prieto, C. A., An, D., Anderson, K. S. J., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 · Cited by 5,341 · cited 1×
“The volume of the 6dF Galaxy Survey is approximately as large as the volume covered by the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey, with a sample density similar to SDSSDR7 (Abazajian et al. 2009).”
MethodThe Design and Implementation of FFTW3
Frigo, M., & Johnson, S. G. (2005) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2004.840301 · Cited by 5,086
Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
Eisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Blanton, M. R., Nichol, R. C., Scranton, R., Seo, H., Tegmark, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/466512 · Cited by 4,641 · cited 9×
“We derive the parameter (Eisenstein et al. 2005) A(zeff) = 100DV (zeff) √ Ωmh2 czeff , (27) which has no dependence on the Hubble constant since DV ∝ h−1.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFinal Results from the Hubble Space Telescope Key Project to Measure the Hubble Constant
Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Gibson, B. K., Ferrarese, L., Kelson, D. D., Sakai, S., Mould, J. R., Robert C. Kennicutt, Jr., Ford, H. C., Graham, J. A., et al. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/320638 · Cited by 3,543
Clustering in real space and in redshift space
Kaiser, N. (1987) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/227.1.1 · Cited by 2,762 · cited 1×
“The model of linear redshift space distortions introduced by Kaiser (1987) is based on the plane parallel approximation.”
MethodEisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Blanton, M. R., Nichol, R. C., Scranton, R., Seo, H., Tegmark, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2005) · Cited by 2,568
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Arnalte-Mur, 2011, MNRAS
- Sanchez, 2008, MNRAS, 390, 1470
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,006
Late time transitions in the quintessence field and the H 0 tension
Valentino, E. D., Ferreira, R. Z., Visinelli, L., & Danielsson, U. (2019) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2019.100385 · Cited by 74
“• BAO: the baryon acoustic oscillations distance measurements given by the 6dFGS [59], SDSSMGS [60], and BOSS DR12 [61] surveys, as adopted by the Planck collaboration [58].”
MethodBounds on light sterile neutrino mass and mixing from cosmology and laboratory searches
Hagstotz, S., de Salas, P. F., Gariazzo, S., Sergio Pastor, B., Gerbino, M., Lattanzi, M., Vagnozzi, S., & Katherine Freese, B. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.123524 · Cited by 75
“To the CMB dataset, we add late-time distance and expansion rate BAO measurements from the 6dFGS [112], SDSS-MGS [113], and BOSS DR12 [114] surveys.”
MethodSoundness of dark energy properties
Valentino, E. D., Gariazzo, S., Mena, O., & Vagnozzi, S. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/07/045 · Cited by 75
“• BAO: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) distance measurements from the 6dFGS [82], SDSS-MGS [83], and BOSS DR12 [1] surveys.”
BackgroundDark sector to restore cosmological concordance
Allali, I. J., Hertzberg, M. P., & Rompineve, F. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.l081303 · Cited by 75
Dark sector interaction and the supernova absolute magnitude tension
Nunes, R. C., & Valentino, E. D. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.063529 · Cited by 73
The power spectrum and bispectrum of SDSS DR11 BOSS galaxies – II. Cosmological interpretation
Gil-Marín, H., Verde, L., Noreña, J., Cuesta, A. J., Samushia, L., Percival, W. J., Wagner, C., Manera, M., & Schneider, D. P. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1359 · Cited by 72
“In some cases, the MNRAS 452, 1914–1921 (2015) CMB constraints are improved by the addition of information on the expansion history via baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements (Percival et al. 2010; Beutler et al. 2011; Blake et al. 2011; Anderson et al. 2013; Padmanabhan et al. 2012).”
BackgroundNeutrino Mass Bounds in the Era of Tension Cosmology
Di Valentino, E., & Melchiorri, A. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6ef5 · Cited by 71
The impact of the fiducial cosmology assumption on BAO distance scale measurements
Carter, P., Beutler, F., Percival, W. J., DeRose, J., Wechsler, R. H., & Zhao, C. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa761 · Cited by 74
“Subsequently, the BAO peak has been detected in later SDSS data releases (Percival et al. 2010; Kazin et al. 2010), the 6dFGS (Beutler et al. 2011; Carter et al. 2018), WiggleZ (Blake et al. 2011), BOSS (Beutler et al. 2017; Ross et al. 2017; Alam et al. 2017), eBOSS Luminous Red Galaxies (Bautista…”
MethodSelf-citationThe hubble tension as a hint of leptogenesis and neutrino mass generation
Escudero, M., & Witte, S. J. (2021) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09276-5 · Cited by 75
Flavor-specific interaction favors strong neutrino self-coupling in the early universe
Das, A., & Ghosh, S. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/07/038 · Cited by 73
Quasar cosmology: dark energy evolution and spatial curvature
Bargiacchi, G., Benetti, M., Capozzıello, S., Lusso, E., Risaliti, G., & Signorini, M. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1941 · Cited by 74
Gómez-Valent, A. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.063506 · Cited by 88
Shafieloo, A., Varun Sahni, A., & Starobinsky, A. A. (2012) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.103527 · Cited by 83
Papastergis, E., Giovanelli, R., Haynes, M. P., Rodríguez-Puebla, A., & Jones, M. G. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/776/1/43 · Cited by 74
“…cross-correlation properties of H i galaxies with respect to various optical samples are especially important in the context of cosmological studies with next generation H i surveys (e.g., Beutler et al. 2011) and 21 cm intensity-mapping experiments at moderate redshift (e.g., Masui et al. 2013).”
BackgroundObservational signatures of anisotropic inflationary models
Ohashi, J., Soda, J., & Tsujikawa, S. (2013) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/12/009 · Cited by 74
Simon, T., Abellán, G. F., Du, P., Poulin, V., & Tsai, Y. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.023516 · Cited by 74
“[155] Florian Beutler, Chris Blake, Matthew Colless, D.”
BackgroundNonlinear structure formation in nonlocal gravity
Barreira, A., Li, B., Hellwing, W. A., Baugh, C. M., & Pascoli, S. (2014) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/09/031 · Cited by 72
“These are the best-fitting ΛCDM parameters to a dataset that comprises the CMB data from the Planck satellite (both temperature and lensing) [1–3], and the BAO data from the 6df [16], SDDS DR7 [90] and BOSS DR9 [5] galaxy redshift surveys.”
MethodHubble flow variance and the cosmic rest frame
Wiltshire, D. L., Smale, P., Mattsson, T., & Watkins, R. (2013) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.083529 · Cited by 73
Updated tomographic analysis of the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect and implications for dark energy
Stölzner, B., Cuoco, A., Julien Lesgourgues, A., & Bilicki, M. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.063506 · Cited by 72
Zhang, J.-F., Zhang, M., Jin, S.-J., Qi, J.-Z., & Zhang, X. (2019) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/09/068 · Cited by 73
The BOSS–WiggleZ overlap region – I. Baryon acoustic oscillations
Beutler, F., Blake, C., Koda, J., Marin, F. A., Seo, H., Cuesta, A. J., & Schneider, D. P. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1943 · Cited by 73
“…at redshift z = 0.6 (Blake et al. 2011b; Kazin et al. 2014) and the 6-degree Field Galaxy Survey (6dFGS) (Jones et al. 2009) yielded C© 2015 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society a 5 per cent constraint at z = 0.1 (Beutler et al. 2011).”
InfluentialSelf-citationConstraints on cosmological parameters in power-law cosmology
Rani, S., Altaibayeva, A., Shahalam, M., Singh, J. K., & Myrzakulov, R. (2015) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/03/031 · Cited by 75
Are cosmological data sets consistent with each other within the Λ cold dark matter model?
Raveri, M. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.043522 · Cited by 73
Cosmology with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope: an overview
Zhan, H., & Tyson, T. (2018) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aab1bd · Cited by 73
Nadathur, S., Woodfinden, A., Percival, W. J., Aubert, M., Bautista, J., Dawson, K., Escoffier, S., Fromenteau, S., Gil-Marín, H., Rich, J., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3074 · Cited by 73
Swampland conjectures and late-time cosmology
Raveri, M., Hu, W., & Sethi, S. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.083518 · Cited by 72
The H0 tension: Δ GN vs. Δ Neff
Ballesteros, G., Notari, A., & Rompineve, F. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/11/024 · Cited by 91
Simon, T., Zhang, P., Poulin, V., & Smith, T. L. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.063505 · Cited by 72
“15 [143, 144], which we refer to as BOSS BAO low−z.”
BackgroundMeasurement of gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background using SPT-3G 2018 data
Pan, Z., Bianchini, F., Wu, W. L. K., Ade, P. A. R., Ahmed, Z., Anderes, E., Anderson, A. J., Ansarinejad, B., Archipley, M., Aylor, K., et al. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.122005 · Cited by 72
CMB and BAO constraints for an induced gravity dark energy model with a quartic potential
Umiltà, C., Ballardini, M., Finelli, F., & Paoletti, D. (2015) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/08/017 · Cited by 74
Testing the Copernican principle by constraining spatial homogeneity
Valkenburg, W., Marra, V., & Clarkson, C. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slt140 · Cited by 72
“We use observations from SDSS, 6DFGS and WiggleZ (Percival et al. 2010; Beutler et al. 2011; Blake et al. 2011), as compiled in Zumalacarregui et al. (2012).”
MethodDetermining the Hubble constant using giant extragalactic H ii regions and H ii galaxies
Chávez, R., Terlevich, E., Terlevich, R. J., Plionis, M., Bresolin, F., Basilakos, S., & Melnick, J. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01299.x · Cited by 72
“Indirect methods to measure H0 have also been developed (e.g. Bonamente et al. 2006; Suyu et al. 2010; Beutler et al. 2011), however, all of the indirect methods use as priors other cosmological parameters, and thus the resulting H0 determinations are model dependent.”
MethodFast simulations for intensity mapping experiments
Alonso, D., Ferreira, P. G., & Santos, M. G. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1666 · Cited by 72
“Lognormal density fields have been used in the past by different collaborations to create fast mock galaxy catalogues using techniques similar to the ones described in Section 3 (Cole et al. 2005; Beutler et al. 2011; Blake et al. 2011), and are, therefore, a wellestablished tool.”
MethodAcebrón, A., Jullo, E., Limousin, M., Tilquin, A., Giocoli, C., Jauzac, M., Mahler, G., & Richard, J. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1330 · Cited by 72
“C O ] Type Ia supernovae (Riess et al. 1998), baryon acoustic oscillations (Beutler et al. 2011; Gil-Maŕın et al. 2016), cosmic shear (Massey et al. 2007; Heymans et al. 2012; Hildebrandt et al. 2017), cluster abundances (de Haan et al. 2016), CMB anisotropies (Planck Collaboration et al. 2016a)…”
BackgroundPark, C., & Ratra, B. (2019) · Astrophysics and Space Science · doi:10.1007/s10509-019-3627-8 · Cited by 72
“References: [1] Alam et al. (2017), [2] Beutler et al. (2011), [3] Ross et al. (2015), [4] Ata et al. (2018), [5] Bautista et al. (2017), [6] FontRibera et al. (2014).”
MethodCosmic expansion histories in massive bigravity with symmetric matter coupling
Enander, J., Solomon, A. R., Akrami, Y., & Mörtsell, E. (2015) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/01/006 · Cited by 71
Phenomenology of the generalized cubic covariant Galileon model and cosmological bounds
Frusciante, N., Peirone, S., Atayde, L., & Felice, A. D. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.064001 · Cited by 71
Testing Low-Redshift Cosmic Acceleration with Large-Scale Structure
Nadathur, S., Percival, W. J., Beutler, F., & Winther, H. A. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.221301 · Cited by 71
Self-citationAchitouv, I., Blake, C., Carter, P., Koda, J., & Beutler, F. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.083502 · Cited by 69
Self-citationConstraints on deviations from ΛCDM within Horndeski gravity.
Bellini, E., Cuesta Vázquez, A. J., Jiménez, R., & Verde, L. (2016) · RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) · Cited by 69
Halo model and halo properties in Galileon gravity cosmologies
Barreira, A., Li, B., Hellwing, W. A., Lombriser, L., Baugh, C. M., & Pascoli, S. (2014) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/04/029 · Cited by 70
“fluctuations power spectrum of the CMB [23], type Ia supernovae (SNIa) from the SNLS 3-yr sample [37] and baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO) measurements from the 6dF [38], SDSS DR7 [41] and BOSS [39] galaxy surveys.”
MethodKwan, J., Sánchez, C., Clampitt, J., Blazek, J., Crocce, M., Jain, B., Zuntz, J., Amara, A., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2464 · Cited by 70
“The other probes that we consider are BAO measurements from 6dF (Beutler et al. 2011), BOSS (Anderson et al. 2014; Ross et al. 2015), Supernova Type Ia measurements (Betoule et al. 2014) and direct measurements of H0 (Efstathiou 2014).”
MethodZhao, G., Wang, Y., Saito, S., Wang, D., Ross, A. J., Beutler, F., Grieb, J. N., Chuang, C.-H., Kitaura, F.-S., Rodríguez-Torres, S. A., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3199 · Cited by 70
“…2014; Alam et al. 2016; Beutler et al. 2016, 2017; Cuesta et al. 2016; Gil-Marı́n et al. 2016; Ross et al. 2017), the two-degree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey (Cole et al. 2005), WiggleZ (Blake et al. 2011; Parkinson et al. 2012), the six-degree Field Galaxy Survey (Beutler et al. 2011) and so on.”
BackgroundSelf-citationTesting late-time cosmic acceleration with uncorrelated baryon acoustic oscillation dataset
Benisty, D., & Staicova, D. (2021) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039502/pdf · Cited by 70
Toward early dark energy and ns=1 with Planck , ACT, and SPT observations
Jiang, J.-Q., & Yun-song Piao, A. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.103514 · Cited by 71
Tanseri, I., Hagstotz, S., Vagnozzi, S., Giusarma, E., & Katherine Freese, B. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Astrophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.07.002 · Cited by 70
Cosmological limits on neutrino unknowns versus low redshift priors
Valentino, E. D., Giusarma, E., Mena, O., MELCHIORRI, A., & Silk, J. I. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.083527 · Cited by 70
Updated constraints and forecasts on primordial tensor modes
Cabass, G., Pagano, L., Salvati, L., Gerbino, M., Giusarma, E., & MELCHIORRI, A. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.063508 · Cited by 72
Constraints on reconstructed dark energy model from SN Ia and BAO/CMB observations
Mamon, A. A., Bamba, K., & Das, S. (2017) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4590-y · Cited by 69
Lin, W., & Ishak, M. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.023532 · Cited by 70
“[21], the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) from the Six Degree Field Galactic Survey (6dF) [22], the main galaxy sample from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-DR7) and the SDSS quasarLyman-α forest [18], and the high-` CMB temperature data from Planck 2015 [23].”
BackgroundMethodConstraining a dark matter and dark energy interaction scenario with a dynamical equation of state
Yang, W., Banerjee, N., & Pan, S. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.123527 · Cited by 69
How predictions of cosmological models depend on Hubble parameter data sets
Sharov, G. S., & Vasiliev, V. O. (2018) · Mathematical Modelling and Geometry · doi:10.26456/mmg/2018-611 · Cited by 69
Bernal, J. L., Smith, T. L., Boddy, K. K., & Kamionkowski, M. (2020) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.123515 · Cited by 69
“9 larger than the ΛCDM prediction for the combined likelihood of BOSS [6], 2dFGS [102], and SDSS DR7 MGS [103] (the BAO dataset considered in Planck analyses).”
BackgroundRevisit of the interaction between holographic dark energy and dark matter
Zhang, Z., Li, S., Li, X.-D., Zhang, X., & Li, M. (2012) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/06/009 · Cited by 80
We do not live in the Rh = ct universe
Bilicki, M., & Seikel, M. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21575.x · Cited by 69
“09 6 z 6 1.75; • radial BAO measurements: 8 data points compiled from Gaztañaga et al. (2009), Beutler et al. (2011), Chuang & Wang (2011), Blake et al. (2012) and Reid et al. (2012), covering redshifts of 0.106 6 z 6 0.73.”
MethodInfluentialCONSTRAINTS ON NON-FLAT COSMOLOGIES WITH MASSIVE NEUTRINOS AFTER PLANCK 2015
Chen, Y., Ratra, B., Biesiada, M., Li, S., & Zhu, Z. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/829/2/61 · Cited by 69
Guo, R.-Y., Li, Y.-H., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. (2017) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/05/040 · Cited by 75
Full-shape galaxy power spectra and the curvature tension
Glanville, A., Howlett, C., & Davis, T. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2891 · Cited by 69
Mehta, K., Cuesta, A. J., Xu, X., Eisenstein, D. J., & Padmanabhan, N. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21112.x · Cited by 68
“The “AllBAO” dataset gives us BAO measurements at various redshifts: z = 0.106 (6dF Galaxy Survey), 0.35 (reconstructed SDSS DR7), 0.6 (WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialImpacts of dark energy on weighing neutrinos: Mass hierarchies considered
Wang, S., Wang, Y., Xia, D., & Zhang, X. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.083519 · Cited by 68
“We use the LOWZ and CMASS samples of BOSS DR12 [17], as well as the 6dFGS [18] and the SDSS MGS [19].”
MethodPhase transition in the dark sector as a proposal to lessen cosmological tensions
Banihashemi, A., Khosravi, N., & Shirazi, A. H. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.123521 · Cited by 68
ΛCDM or self-interacting neutrinos: How CMB data can tell the two models apart
Park, M., Kreisch, C. D., Dunkley, J., Hadzhiyska, B., & Cyr-Racine, F.-Y. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.063524 · Cited by 68
Can dark energy be expressed as a power series of the Hubble parameter?
Rezaei, M., Malekjani, M., & Solà, J. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.023539 · Cited by 72
Khatri, R., & Sunyaev, R. A. (2013) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/06/026 · Cited by 68
Trouble beyond H0 and the new cosmic triangles
Bernal, J. L., Verde, L., Jiménez, R., Kamionkowski, M., Valcin, D., & Wandelt, B. D. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.103533 · Cited by 67
“We use SNeIa observations from Pantheon [4] and BAO measurements from 6dFGRS [52], SDSS DR7 [53], BOSS [5], WiggleZ [54], and eBOSS, including galaxies, quasars and Lyman-α forest [55–59] as relative distance indicators.”
MethodLin, W., Chen, X., & Mack, K. J. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac12cf · Cited by 70
Menci, N., Adil, S. A., Mukhopadhyay, U., Sen, A. A., & Vagnozzi, S. (2024) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/07/072 · Cited by 71
Investigating late-time dark energy and massive neutrinos in light of DESI Y1 BAO
Rebouças, J., de Souza, D. H. F., Zhong, K., Miranda, V., & Rosenfeld, R. (2025) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/024 · Cited by 68
Results from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe
Komatsu, E., Bennett, C. L., (on behalf of the WMAP science team), Barnes, C., Bean, R., Bennett, C. L., Doré, O., Dunkley, J., Gold, B., Greason, M. R., et al. (2014) · Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics · doi:10.1093/ptep/ptu083 · Cited by 68
Kitaura, F.-S., Chuang, C.-H., Liang, Y., Zhao, C., TAO, C., Rodríguez-Torres, S. A., Eisenstein, D. J., Gil-Marín, H., Kneib, J., McBride, C. K., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.171301 · Cited by 68
Constraints on the neutrino mass and mass hierarchy from cosmological observations
Huang, Q.-G., Wang, K., & Wang, S. (2016) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4334-z · Cited by 67
Long range interactions in cosmology: implications for neutrinos
Esteban, I., & Salvadó, J. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/036 · Cited by 66
Cosmological constraints from the power spectrum of eBOSS emission line galaxies
Ivanov, M. M. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.103514 · Cited by 67
No-go guide for the Hubble tension: Late-time solutions
Cai, R.-G., Guo, Z., Wang, S.-J., Yu, W.-W., & Zhou, Y. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.l021301 · Cited by 69
Impacts of dark energy on weighing neutrinos after Planck 2015
Zhang, X. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.083011 · Cited by 67
An efficient and accurate hybrid method for simulating non-linear neutrino structure
Bird, S., Ali-Haïmoud, Y., Feng, Y., & Liu, J. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2376 · Cited by 67
“…of Mν < 0.23 eV (Ade et al. 2015) using primary cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature data, combined with low-` polarization, CMB lensing, type Ia supernovae (Betoule et al. 2014), and baryon acoustic oscillation measurements (Beutler et al. 2011; Anderson et al. 2014; Ross et al. 2015).”
MethodInfluentialConstraining the dark energy equation of state with H ii galaxies
Chávez, R., Plionis, M., Basilakos, S., Terlevich, R. J., Terlevich, E., Melnick, J., Bresolin, F., & González-Morán, A. L. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1813 · Cited by 67
“…a large number of dedicated surveys have been used to measure BAOs, among which the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey (Blake et al. 2011), the 6dFGS (Beutler et al. 2011) and the SDSS Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) of SDSS-III (Eisenstein et al. 2011; Anderson et al. 2014; Aubourg…”
MethodCosmological bound on the QCD axion mass, redux
D’Eramo, F., Valentino, E. D., Giarè, W., Hajkarim, F., MELCHIORRI, A., Mena, O., Renzi, F., & Yun, S. (2022) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/022 · Cited by 66
“• Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) measurements extracted from data from the 6dFGS [99], SDSS MGS [100] and BOSS DR12 [101] surveys.”
A comprehensive comparison of cosmological models from the latest observational data
Shi, K., Huang, Y. F., & Lu, T. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21784.x · Cited by 66
“Recently, in the low-redshift Universe, the 6dF Galaxy Survey (6dFGS) team has reported a BAO detection at z = 0.1 (Beutler et al. 2011).”
BackgroundInfluentialPROBING COSMOLOGICAL ISOTROPY WITH TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE
Bengaly, C. A. P., Bernui, A., & Alcaniz, J. S. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/808/1/39 · Cited by 65
Robust and model-independent cosmological constraints from distance measurements
Zhai, Z., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/005 · Cited by 65
Akarsu, Ö., Katırcı, N., Kumar, S., Nunes, R. C., Öztürk, B., & Sharma, S. (2020) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08586-4 · Cited by 73
Taxonomy of Dark Energy Models
Motta, V., García-Aspeitia, M. A., Hernández-Almada, A., Magaña, J. A., & Verdugo, T. (2021) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe7060163 · Cited by 63
Linear cosmological constraints on two-body decaying dark matter scenarios and the S8 tension
Abellán, G. F., Murgia, R., & Poulin, V. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.123533 · Cited by 68
Improved Planck Constraints on Axionlike Early Dark Energy as a Resolution of the Hubble Tension
Efstathiou, G., Rosenberg, E., & Poulin, V. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.221002 · Cited by 65
“15 [65, 66] and the Pantheon+ catalog of over 1600 SN1a which constrains the luminosity distance over the redshift range 0 .”
BackgroundConstraints on the Brans-Dicke gravity theory with the Planck data
Li, Y., Wu, F., & Chen, X. (2013) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.084053 · Cited by 73
An Evaluation of Cosmological Models from the Expansion and Growth of Structure Measurements
Zhai, Z., Blanton, M., Slosar, A., & Tinker, J. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9888 · Cited by 67
“In our calculation, the data adopted are taken from 6dFGS (Beutler et al. 2011), the SDSS main galaxy sample (MGS, Ross et al. 2015), BOSS galaxies (Anderson et al. 2014), the BOSS LyaF auto-correlation (Delubac et al. 2015), and the BOSS LyaF cross-correlation (Font-Ribera et al. 2014).”
MethodDark energy constraints after the new Planck data
Xia, J., Li, H., & Zhang, X. (2013) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.063501 · Cited by 64
de la Cruz-Dombriz, Á., Dunsby, P. K. S., Luongo, O., & Reverberi, L. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/12/042 · Cited by 64
Warm decaying dark matter and the hubble tension
Blinov, N., Keith, C., & Hooper, D. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/06/005 · Cited by 64
“• The 2018 Planck measurements of the CMB (via TTTEEE Plik lite high-`, TT and EE low-`, and lensing likelihoods) [52], • BAO data from the BOSS survey (data release 12) [53], low-redshift measurements from the 6dF survey [54], and the BOSS main galaxy sample [55], • The local measurement of the Hubble constant, H0 =…”
MethodZhao, Z.-W., Wang, L.-F., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. (2020) · 中国科学通报:英文版 · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2020.04.032 · Cited by 64
“For the BAO data, we consider the measurements from 6dFGS at zeff 1⁄4 0:106 [52], SDSS-MGS at zeff 1⁄4 0:15 [53], and BOSS-DR12 at zeff 1⁄4 0:38, 0.”
MethodAddressing H0 tension by means of VCDM
Felice, A. D., Shinji Mukohyama, A., & Pookkillath, M. C. (2021) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136201 · Cited by 65
“The 6dF Galaxy Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and the Local Hubble Constant.”
MethodInfluentialElcio Abdalla, A., Ferreira, E. G. M., Landim, R. G., Costa, A. A., Fornazier, K. S. F., Abdalla, F. B., Barosi, L., Brito, F. A., de Queiroz, A. R., Thyrso Villela, H., et al. (2021) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140883 · Cited by 64
Revealing the effects of curvature on the cosmological models
Yang, W., Giarè, W., Pan, S., Valentino, E. D., MELCHIORRI, A., & Silk, J. I. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.063509 · Cited by 64
AIC and BIC for cosmological interacting scenarios
Arévalo, F., Cid, A., & Moya, J. (2017) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5128-7 · Cited by 64
Observational constraints on oscillating dark-energy parametrizations
Pan, S., Saridakis, E. N., & Yang, W. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.063510 · Cited by 64
“106 [50], from the Main Galaxy Sample of Data Release 7 of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-MGS) at zeff = 0.”
BackgroundZhang, X.-N., Wang, L.-F., Zhang, J., & Zhang, X. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.063510 · Cited by 64
“[31] F.”
Observational constraints and dynamical analysis of Kaniadakis horizon-entropy cosmology
Hernández-Almada, A., León, G., Magaña, J. A., García-Aspeitia, M. A., Motta, V., Saridakis, E. N., Yesmakhanova, K., & Millano, A. D. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac795 · Cited by 75
Reconstructing the dark matter and dark energy interaction scenarios from observations
Yang, W., Banerjee, N., Paliathanasis, A., & Pan, S. (2019) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2019.100383 · Cited by 63
“015 from 6-degree Field Galaxy Red-shift Survey (6dFGRS) data [67], r s ( z d ) /D V ( z = 0 .”
T0 censorship of early dark energy and AdS vacua
Ye, G., & Yun-song Piao, A. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.083523 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Beutler, F., Blake, C., Colless, M., Jones, D. H., Staveley-Smith, L., Campbell, L., Parker, Q., Saunders, W., & Watson, F.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
- Australian Astronomical Observatory (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- Western Kentucky University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Beutler, Florian
- ORCID
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-07-25
- Volume
- 416
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3017-3032
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121951791
- Cited by
- 2,590
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 90 · 2025: 191 · 2024: 228 · 2023: 207 · 2022: 210 · 2021: 236 · 2020: 241 · 2019: 207 · 2018: 176 · 2017: 178 · 2016: 167 · 2015: 131 · 2014: 147 · 2013: 113 · 2012: 61
- FWCI
- 54.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #219
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- Australian National University
- Australian Research Council (DP0208876)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- baryon acoustic oscillations, 6dF Galaxy Survey, local Hubble constant, sound horizon, distance-redshift relation, dark energy equation of state, wallabies, taipan, radio galaxy surveys, cosmological constraints
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review