The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The 6dF Galaxy Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations and the local Hubble constant: 6dFGS: BAOs and the local Hubble constant
Open accessAbstract
We analyse the large-scale correlation function of the 6dF Galaxy Survey (6dFGS) and detect a baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) signal at 105 h−1 Mpc. The 6dFGS BAO detection allows us to constrain the distance–redshift relation at zeff= 0.106. We achieve a distance measure of DV(zeff) = 457 ± 27 Mpc and a measurement of the distance ratio, rs(zd)/DV(zeff) = 0.336 ± 0.015 (4.5 per cent precision), where rs(zd) is the sound horizon at the drag epoch zd. The low-effective redshift of 6dFGS makes it a competitive and independent alternative to Cepheids and low-z supernovae in constraining the Hubble constant. We find a Hubble constant of H0= 67 ± 3.2 km s−1 Mpc−1 (4.8 per cent precision) that depends only on the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe-7 (WMAP-7) calibration of the sound horizon and on the galaxy clustering in 6dFGS. Compared to earlier BAO studies at higher redshift, our analysis is less dependent on other cosmological parameters. The sensitivity to H0 can be used to break the degeneracy between the dark energy equation of state parameter w and H0 in the cosmic microwave background data. We determine that w=−0.97 ± 0.13, using only WMAP-7 and BAO data from both 6dFGS and Percival et al. (2010). We also discuss predictions for the large-scale correlation function of two future wide-angle surveys: the Wide field ASKAP L-band Legacy All-sky Blind surveY (WALLABY) blind H i survey (with the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder, ASKAP) and the proposed Transforming Astronomical Imaging surveys through Polychromatic Analysis of Nebulae (TAIPAN) all-southern-sky optical galaxy survey with the UK Schmidt Telescope. We find that both surveys are very likely to yield detections of the BAO peak, making WALLABY the first radio galaxy survey to do so. We also predict that TAIPAN has the potential to constrain the Hubble constant with 3 per cent precision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SEVEN-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE(WMAP) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Smith, K. M., Dunkley, J., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Nolta, M. R., Page, L., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18 · Cited by 8,802
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary
York, D., Adelman, J., Anderson, J., Anderson, S., Annis, J., Bahcall, N., Bakken, J., Barkhouser, R., Bastian, S., Berman, E., et al. (2000) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/301513 · Cited by 8,368 · cited 1×
“The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; York et al. 2000), and the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS; Colless et al. 2001) were the first redshift surveys which have directly detected the BAO signal.”
MethodFIVE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Dunkley, J., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Limon, M., Page, L., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/330 · Cited by 5,786
THE SEVENTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY
Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agüeros, M. A., Allam, S. S., Prieto, C. A., An, D., Anderson, K. S. J., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 · Cited by 5,341 · cited 1×
“The volume of the 6dF Galaxy Survey is approximately as large as the volume covered by the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey, with a sample density similar to SDSSDR7 (Abazajian et al. 2009).”
MethodThe Design and Implementation of FFTW3
Frigo, M., & Johnson, S. G. (2005) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2004.840301 · Cited by 5,086
Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
Eisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Blanton, M. R., Nichol, R. C., Scranton, R., Seo, H., Tegmark, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/466512 · Cited by 4,641 · cited 9×
“We derive the parameter (Eisenstein et al. 2005) A(zeff) = 100DV (zeff) √ Ωmh2 czeff , (27) which has no dependence on the Hubble constant since DV ∝ h−1.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFinal Results from the Hubble Space Telescope Key Project to Measure the Hubble Constant
Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Gibson, B. K., Ferrarese, L., Kelson, D. D., Sakai, S., Mould, J. R., Robert C. Kennicutt, Jr., Ford, H. C., Graham, J. A., et al. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/320638 · Cited by 3,543
Clustering in real space and in redshift space
Kaiser, N. (1987) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/227.1.1 · Cited by 2,762 · cited 1×
“The model of linear redshift space distortions introduced by Kaiser (1987) is based on the plane parallel approximation.”
MethodEisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Blanton, M. R., Nichol, R. C., Scranton, R., Seo, H., Tegmark, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2005) · Cited by 2,568
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Arnalte-Mur, 2011, MNRAS
- Sanchez, 2008, MNRAS, 390, 1470
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,006
Cosmology from cosmic shear with Dark Energy Survey science verification data
Abbott, T., Abdalla, F., Allam, S., Amara, A., Annis, J., Armstrong, R., Bacon, D., Banerji, M., Bauer, A., Baxter, E., et al. (2015) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.022001 · Cited by 147
Evidence for dark matter interactions in cosmological precision data?
Julien Lesgourgues, A., Marques-Tavares, G., & Schmaltz, M. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/02/037 · Cited by 174
The BAO+BBN take on the Hubble tension
Schöneberg, N., Julien Lesgourgues, A., & Hooper, D. C. (2019) · RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) · Cited by 174
CFHTLenS: testing the laws of gravity with tomographic weak lensing and redshift-space distortions
Simpson, F., Heymans, C., Parkinson, D., Blake, C., Kilbinger, M., Benjamin, J., Erben, T., Hildebrandt, H., Hoekstra, H., Kitching, T. D., et al. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sts493 · Cited by 187
“For example Anderson et al. (2012) find H0 = 68.4 ± 1.3 km s−1 Mpc−1, while studies from 6dFGS and SDSS measure 67 ± 3.2 km s−1 Mpc−1 and 69.8±1.2 km s−1 Mpc−1 respectively (Beutler et al. 2011; Mehta et al. 2012).”
InfluentialSelf-citationCuesta, A. J., Vargas-Magaña, M., Beutler, F., Bolton, A. S., Brownstein, J. R., Eisenstein, D. J., Gil-Marín, H., Ho, S., McBride, C. K., Maraston, C., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw066 · Cited by 171
“A review of BAO measurements was provided in Anderson et al. (2012), which described recent experiments (e.g. the 6dFGRS, WiggleZ and SDSS; Beutler et al. 2011; Blake et al. 2011; Padmanabhan et al. 2012), and presented the first set of analyses of the galaxies in Data Release 9 of the Baryon…”
MethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationThe 6dF Galaxy Survey: peculiar velocity field and cosmography
Springob, C. M., Magoulas, C., Colless, M., Mould, J. R., Erdoğdu, P., Jones, D. H. P., Lucey, J. R., Campbell, L., & Fluke, C. J. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1743 · Cited by 170
“In the future, deeper all-sky redshift surveys, such as WALLABY (Duffy et al. 2012) and TAIPAN (Beutler et al. 2011; Colless, Beutler & Blake 2013), should be able to provide more accurate models of both the density and velocity fields at the distance of structures such as Shapley.”
BackgroundSelf-citationGeneral cosmography model with spatial curvature
Li, E.-K., Du, M., & Xu, L. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3308 · Cited by 169
Dark Energy with Phantom Crossing and the H0 Tension
Valentino, E. D., Mukherjee, A., & Sen, A. A. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23040404 · Cited by 169
“• BAO: we add the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) measurements 6dFGS [88], SDSS MGS [89], and BOSS DR12 [90], as adopted by the Planck collaboration in [35] (Note that there is an updated version of the BAO data [91], but we prefer to keep the combination used in the literature, for a better comparison).”
MethodKiDS-450: testing extensions to the standard cosmological model
Joudaki, S., Mead, A., Blake, C., Choi, A., de Jong, J., Erben, T., Fenech Conti, I., Herbonnet, R., Heymans, C., Hildebrandt, H., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx998 · Cited by 200
“To this end, Planck is combined with SNe from JLA, and BAOs from the 6dF Galaxy Survey (Beutler et al. 2011), SDSS Main Galaxy Sample (Ross et al. 2015) and BOSS LOWZ/CMASS samples (Anderson et al. 2014).”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationA CMB search for the neutrino mass mechanism and its relation to the Hubble tension
Escudero, M., & Witte, S. J. (2020) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7854-5 · Cited by 168
Sánchez, A. G., Montesano, F., Kazin, E. A., Aubourg, É., Beutler, F., Brinkmann, J., Brownstein, J. R., Cuesta, A. J., Dawson, K., Eisenstein, D. J., et al. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu342 · Cited by 167
“…and correlation functions measured from N-body simulations (e.g. Sánchez et al. 2008; Montesano, Sánchez & Phleps 2010) and has been applied to the analysis of numerous galaxy samples (Sánchez et al. 2009, 2012, 2013; Beutler et al. 2011; Blake et al. 2011; Montesano, Sánchez & Phleps 2012).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationStatus of Neutrino Properties and Future Prospects—Cosmological and Astrophysical Constraints
Gerbino, M., & Lattanzi, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2017.00070 · Cited by 165
Updated results on neutrino mass and mass hierarchy from cosmology with Planck 2018 likelihoods
Choudhury, S. R., & Hannestad, S. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/07/037 · Cited by 165
Testing the interaction between dark energy and dark matter with Planck data
Costa, A. A., Xu, X., Wang, B., Ferreira, E. G. M., & Elcio Abdalla, A. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.103531 · Cited by 164
New constraints on interacting dark energy from cosmic chronometers
Nunes, R. C., Pan, S., & Saridakis, E. N. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.023508 · Cited by 164
Limits on wCDM from the EFTofLSS with the PyBird code
D’Amico, G., Senatore, L., & Zhang, P. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/01/006 · Cited by 164
“When quoting BAO, we also include measurements at small redshift from 6DF [56] and SDSS DR7 MGS [57], as well as high redshift Lyman-α forest autocorrelation and cross-correlation with quasars from eBOSS DR14 measurements [58, 59].”
MethodFeebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2022 Workshop Report
Antel, C., Battaglieri, M., Beacham, J. B., Bœhm, C., Buchmueller, O. L., Calore, F., Carenza, P., Chauhan, B., Cladé, P., Coloma, P., et al. (2023) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12168-5 · Cited by 191
Limits on neutrino-neutrino scattering in the early Universe
Cyr-Racine, F.-Y., & Sigurdson, K. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.123533 · Cited by 163
Update on coupled dark energy and the H 0 tension
Gómez-Valent, A., Pettorino, V., & Amendola, L. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.123513 · Cited by 154
Bautista, J., Vargas-Magaña, M., Dawson, K., Percival, W., Brinkmann, J., Brownstein, J., Camacho, B., Comparat, J., Gil-Marín, H., Mueller, E., et al. (2017) · Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aacea5 · Cited by 143
“These spectroscopic programs were followed by the WiggleZ survey at higher redshift (Drinkwater et al. 2010) and the 6-degree Field Galaxy Survey (6dFGS; Jones et al. 2009) at lower redshift, also measuring BAO (Beutler et al. 2011; Blake et al. 2011, respectively).”
MethodEffective field theory of cosmic acceleration: Constraining dark energy with CMB data
Raveri, M., Hu, B., Frusciante, N., & Silvestri, A. (2014) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.043513 · Cited by 175
Tension between the power spectrum of density perturbations measured on large and small scales
Battye, R. A., Charnock, T., & Moss, A. (2015) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.103508 · Cited by 160
Bocquet, S., Saro, A., Mohr, J. J., Aird, K. A., Ashby, M. L. N., Bautz, M. W., Bayliss, M. B., Bazin, G., Benson, B. A., Bleem, L. E., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/799/2/214 · Cited by 160
“We adopt a Gaussian prior on the Hubble constant H0 = 73.8 ± 2.4 km s−1 Mpc−1 from the low-redshift measurements from the Hubble Space Telescope (Riess et al. 2011).”
MethodInfluentialNew constraints on coupled dark energy from the Planck satellite experiment
Salvatelli, V., Marchini, A., Lopez-Honorez, L., & Mena, O. (2013) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.023531 · Cited by 159
Testing ΛCDM at the lowest redshifts with SN Ia and galaxy velocities
Dragan Huterer, A., Shafer, D. L., Scolnic, D. M., & Schmidt, F. (2017) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/05/015 · Cited by 159
“106 [56], which is the lowest-redshift BAO distance measurement to date.”
BackgroundVacuum phase transition solves the H 0 tension
Valentino, E. D., Linder, E. V., & MELCHIORRI, A. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.043528 · Cited by 159
Model-independent constraints on dark energy evolution from low-redshift observations
Capozzıello, S., Ruchika, R., & Sen, A. A. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz176 · Cited by 178
Is there an early Universe solution to Hubble tension?
Krishnan, C., Colgáin, E. Ó., Ruchika, R., Sen, A. A., Sheikh-Jabbari, M. M., & Yang, T. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.103525 · Cited by 159
Zarrouk, P., Burtin, E., Gil-Marín, H., Ross, A. J., Tojeiro, R., Pâris, I., Dawson, K., Myers, A. D., Percival, W. J., Chuang, C.-H., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty506 · Cited by 157
Investigating Cosmic Discordance
Di Valentino, E., Melchiorri, A., & Silk, J. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abe1c4 · Cited by 166
Predictions for ASKAP neutral hydrogen surveys
Duffy, A. R., Meyer, M., Staveley‐Smith, L., Bernyk, M., Croton, D., Koribalski, B. S., Gerstmann, D., & Westerlund, S. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21987.x · Cited by 156
“…galaxies on large scales (e.g. Burkey & Taylor 2004; Abate et al. 2008), the measurement of Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations and the Hubble constant (Beutler et al. 2011), the measurement of the rms mass fluctuations, σ8 & growth factor, f (Beutler et al. 2012) and the surface brightness dimming of…”
BackgroundSelf-citationUpdated constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions from Planck
Archidiacono, M., & Hannestad, S. (2014) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/07/046 · Cited by 155
Observational constraints on one-parameter dynamical dark-energy parametrizations and the H0 tension
Yang, W., Pan, S., Valentino, E. D., Saridakis, E. N., & Chakraborty, S. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.043543 · Cited by 155
“Furthermore, we add the baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) distance measurements, and we call them “BAO” [51, 52, 53].”
MethodAn Overview of CHIME, the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment
Amiri, M., Bandura, K., Boskovic, A., Chen, T., Cliche, J.-F., Deng, M., Denman, N., Dobbs, M., Fandino, M., Foreman, S., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac6fd9 · Cited by 155
“…redshifts up to z ∼ 0.8 have been made by observing the distribution of optically-detected galaxies, using either spectroscopic (Percival et al. 2007; Beutler et al. 2011; Blake et al. 2011; Padmanabhan et al. 2012; Anderson et al. 2012; Ross et al. 2015; Alam et al. 2017, 2021) or photometric…”
MethodInfluentialWeighing the giants– V. Galaxy cluster scaling relations
Mantz, A. B., Allen, S. W., Morris, R. G., von der Linden, A., Applegate, D., Kelly, P. L., Burke, D. L., Donovan, D., & Ebeling, H. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2250 · Cited by 159
“…compilation of type Ia supernovae (Suzuki et al. 2012), and the BAO data set combines results from the 6-degree Field Galaxy Survey (6dF; z = 0.106; Beutler et al. 2011) and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS, z = 0.35 and 7 Note that our approach fundamentally differs from that used in some…”
MethodInfluentialThe Hubble tension in light of the Full-Shape analysis of Large-Scale Structure data
D’Amico, G., Senatore, L., Zhang, P., & Zheng, H. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/072 · Cited by 153
“When quoting BAO, we also include measurements at small redshift from 6DF [72] and SDSS DR7 MGS [73], as well as high-redshift Lyman-α forest auto-correlation and cross-correlation with quasars from eBOSS DR14 measurements [74, 75].”
MethodDark energy, α-attractors, and large-scale structure surveys
Akrami, Y., Каллош, Р., Linde, A. D., & Vardanyan, V. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/06/041 · Cited by 148
Nonlinear structure formation in the cubic Galileon gravity model
Barreira, A., Li, B., Hellwing, W. A., Baugh, C. M., & Pascoli, S. (2013) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/10/027 · Cited by 147
Possible signals of vacuum dynamics in the Universe
Solà, J., Pérez, J. D. C., & Gómez-Valent, A. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1253 · Cited by 163
“…the ΛCDM, XCDM, CPL and the three DVMs to the cosmological data from type Ia supernovae c© 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000 (Betoule et al. 2014), BAOs (Beutler et al. 2011; Kazin et al. 2014; Ross et al. 2015; Gil-Maŕın et al. 2017; Delubac et al. 2015; Aubourg et al. 2015), the values of the…”
BackgroundMethods for cluster cosmology and application to the SDSS in preparation for DES Year 1 release
Costanzi, M., Rozo, E., Simet, M., Zhang, Y., EVRARD, A. E., Mantz, A. B., Rykoff, E. S., Jeltema, T., Gruen, D., Allen, S. W., et al. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1949 · Cited by 144
Alleviating the H 0 and σ 8 anomalies with a decaying dark matter model
Pandey, K. L., Karwal, T., & Das, S. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/07/026 · Cited by 151
“• BAO: the ‘Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation’ data from DR12-BAO [60], SDSS-6DF [61] and SDSS-MGS [62]”
InfluentialPrimordial gravitational waves from NANOGrav: A broken power-law approach
Benetti, M., Graef, L. L., & Vagnozzi, S. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.043520 · Cited by 144
New constraints on f(R) gravity from clusters of galaxies
Cataneo, M., Rapetti, D., Schmidt, F., Mantz, A. B., Allen, S. W., Applegate, D., Kelly, P. L., von der Linden, A., & Morris, R. G. (2015) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.044009 · Cited by 142
Constraints on the coupling between dark energy and dark matter from CMB data
Murgia, R., Gariazzo, S., & Nicolao Fornengo, B. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/04/014 · Cited by 142
“We include the BAO as determined by 6dFGS [48], SDSSMGS [49] and BOSS DR11 [50], together with the RSD determinations from [51].”
MethodAccelerated cosmos in a nonextensive setup
Moradpour, H., Bonilla, A., Abreu, É. M. C., & Neto, J. A. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.123504 · Cited by 144
Cosmographic analysis with Chebyshev polynomials
Capozzıello, S., D’Agostino, R., & Luongo, O. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty422 · Cited by 141
Can f(Q) gravity challenge ΛCDM ?
Atayde, L., & Frusciante, N. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.064052 · Cited by 141
Bautista, J., Vargas-Magaña, M., Dawson, K., Percival, W. J., Brinkmann, J., Brownstein, J., Camacho, B., Comparat, J., Gil-Marín, H., Mueller, E., et al. (2018) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 140
Early modified gravity in light of the H0 tension and LSS data
Braglia, M., Ballardini, M., Finelli, F., & Koyama, K. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.043528 · Cited by 151
Xu, X., Padmanabhan, N., Eisenstein, D. J., Mehta, K., & Cuesta, A. J. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21573.x · Cited by 139
“…in Cole et al. (2005); Eisenstein et al. (2005); Hütsi (2006); Tegmark et al. (2006); Padmanabhan et al. (2007); Percival et al. (2007a,b); Sanchez et al. (2009); Kazin et al. (2010); Percival et al. (2010); Beutler et al. (2011); Blake et al. (2011a,b); Ho et al. (2012); Seo et al. (2012).”
New observational constraints on f ( T ) gravity from cosmic chronometers
Nunes, R. C., Pan, S., & Saridakis, E. N. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/08/011 · Cited by 140
“following 6 BAO data in order to constrain the expansion history of a given cosmological model: the Main Galaxy Sample of Data Release 7 of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSSMGS) [104], the measurement from the Six Degree Field Galaxy Survey (6dF) [105], the LOWZ and CMASS galaxy samples of the Baryon Oscillation Spectros…”
MethodThe galaxy power spectrum take on spatial curvature and cosmic concordance
Vagnozzi, S., Di Valentino, E., Gariazzo, S., Melchiorri, A., Mena, O., & Silk, J. (2021) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2021.100851 · Cited by 138
Cosmic acceleration with bulk viscosity in modified f ( Q ) gravity
Solanki, R., Pacif, S. K. J., Parida, A., & Sahoo, P. K. (2021) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2021.100820 · Cited by 137
A FIRST APPLICATION OF THE ALCOCK-PACZYNSKI TEST TO STACKED COSMIC VOIDS
Sutter, P. M., Lavaux, G., Wandelt, B. D., & Weinberg, D. H. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/761/2/187 · Cited by 133
“…“standard candles,” such as Type Ia supernovae (e.g., Aldering et al. 2002), or “standard rulers,” such as radio galaxy diameters (Daly et al. 2009) or baryon acoustic oscillations (BAOs; e.g., Eisenstein et al. 2005; Blake et al. 2011; Beutler et al. 2011; Anderson et al. 2012; Mehta et al. 2012).”
BackgroundTesting ΛCDM at the lowest redshifts with SN Ia and galaxy velocities
Dragan Huterer, A., Shafer, D., Scolnic, D., & Schmidt, F. (2017) · Max Planck Digital Library · Cited by 135
FAST RADIO BURST/GAMMA-RAY BURST COSMOGRAPHY
Gao, H., Li, Z., & Zhang, B. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/788/2/189 · Cited by 133
“…various standard candles or rulers, such as Type Ia supernovae (SN Ia) (Riess et al. 1998), baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) (Anderson et al. 2012; Beutler et al. 2011), as well as small scale anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation (Hinshaw et al. 2013; Ade et al. 2013).”
BackgroundTwo-season Atacama Cosmology Telescope polarimeter lensing power spectrum
Sherwin, B. D., van Engelen, A., Sehgal, N., Madhavacheril, M. S., Addison, G. E., Aiola, S., Allison, R., Battaglia, N., Becker, D., Beall, J. A., et al. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.123529 · Cited by 133
MassiveNuS: cosmological massive neutrino simulations
Liu, J., Bird, S., Matilla, J. M. Z., Hill, J. C., Haiman, Z., Madhavacheril, M. S., Petri, A., & Spergel, D. N. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/049 · Cited by 133
Johannsen, T. (2016) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/11/113001 · Cited by 147
Neutrino mass limits: Robust information from the power spectrum of galaxy surveys
Cuesta, A. J., Niro, V., & Verde, L. (2016) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2016.04.005 · Cited by 131
Cosmological constraints in extended parameter space from the Planck 2018 Legacy release
Valentino, E. D., MELCHIORRI, A., & Silk, J. I. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/01/013 · Cited by 131
Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Baxter, E., et al. (2023) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.083504 · Cited by 131
Constraining ultralarge-scale cosmology with multiple tracers in optical and radio surveys
Alonso, D., & Ferreira, P. G. (2015) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.063525 · Cited by 124
Arcones, A., & Thielemann, F. ‐. (2022) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-022-00146-x · Cited by 147
The observational status of Galileon gravity after Planck
Barreira, A., Li, B., Baugh, C. M., & Pascoli, S. (2014) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/08/059 · Cited by 128
“The final dataset, denoted by PLB, also includes the BAO measurements obtained from the 6df [54], SDDS DR7 [55], BOSS DR9 [56] and WiggleZ [57] galaxy redshift surveys.”
MethodIs local H0at odds with dark energy EFT?
Lee, B.-H., Lee, W., Colgáin, E. Ó., Sheikh-Jabbari, M. M., & Thakur, S. (2022) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/04/004 · Cited by 131
Beutler, F., Saito, S., Brownstein, J. R., Chuang, C.-H., Cuesta, A. J., Percival, W. J., Ross, A. J., Ross, N. P., Schneider, D. P., Samushia, L., et al. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1702 · Cited by 135
“We occasionally also include the BAO constraint of 6dFGS (Beutler et al. 2011) and LOWZ (Anderson et al. 2013b; Tojeiro et al. 2014).”
MethodSelf-citationA parametric reconstruction of the deceleration parameter
Mamon, A. A., & Das, S. (2017) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5066-4 · Cited by 127
Shedding light on dark matter-dark energy interactions
Lucca, M., & Hooper, D. C. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.123502 · Cited by 127
“106 [93], by SDSS from the MGS galaxy sample at z = 0.”
MethodGeorge, E. M., Reichardt, C. L., Aird, K. A., Benson, B. A., Bleem, L. E., Carlstrom, J. E., Chang, C. L., Cho, H.-M., Crawford, T. M., Crites, A. T., et al. (2015) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 127
Model independentH(z) reconstruction using the cosmic inverse distance ladder
Lemos, P., Lee, E., Efstathiou, G., & Gratton, S. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3082 · Cited by 126
“(11) Note that (Beutler et al. 2011) use the Eisenstein & Hu (1998) formulae to calculate rd.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEvolution of Dark Energy Reconstructed from the Latest Observations
Wang, Y., Pogosian, L., Zhao, G.-B., & Zucca, A. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf238 · Cited by 126
The SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey
Ghirardini, V., Bülbül, E., Artis, E., Clerc, N., Garrel, C., Grandis, S., Kluge, M., Liu, A., Bahar, Y. E., Balzer, F., et al. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348852 · Cited by 126
“Given the consistency, we combine eRASS1 chains with both Pantheon SNe, Planck CMB, and SDSS BAO data.”
InfluentialPlanck intermediate results: XXIV. Constraints on variations in fundamental constants⋆
Planck Collaboration:, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Battaner, E., et al. (2015) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424496 · Cited by 125
“…also present results using Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) data from the following redshift surveys: the SDSS DR7 measurement at z = 0.35 (Padmanabhan et al. 2012); the BOSS DR9 measurement at z = 0.57 (Anderson et al. 2013); and the 6dF Galaxy Survey measurement at z = 0.1 (Beutler et al. 2011).”
MethodInfluentialConstraints on interacting dark energy models from Planck 2015 and redshift-space distortion data
Costa, A. A., Xu, X.-D., Wang, B., & Abdalla, E. (2017) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/01/028 · Cited by 125
“106 [32], the SDSS-MGS at effective redshift zeff = 0.”
BackgroundInteracting neutrinos in cosmology: exact description and constraints
Oldengott, I. M., Tram, T., Rampf, C., & Wong, Y. Y. Y. (2017) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/11/027 · Cited by 125
“BAO Baryon acoustic oscillation peak scale as measured by 6DF [30], BOSS LOWZ and CMASS [31, 32], and the SDSS Main Galaxy Sample [33].”
MethodUpdated bounds on sum of neutrino masses in various cosmological scenarios
Choudhury, S. R., & Choubey, S. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/09/017 · Cited by 125
Relaxing cosmological tensions with a sign switching cosmological constant
Akarsu, Ö., Kumar, S., Özülker, E., & Vazquez, J. A. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.123512 · Cited by 125
“, Ly-α DR14, BAO-Galaxy consensus, MGS and 6dFGS as presented in [3, 84, 85, 148, 161, 162].”
BackgroundCosmological constraints on interacting dark energy with redshift-space distortion after Planck data
Yang, W., & Xu, L. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.083517 · Cited by 124
New Constraint on Early Dark Energy from Planck and BOSS Data Using the Profile Likelihood
Herold, L., Ferreira, E. G. M., & Komatsu, E. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac63a3 · Cited by 124
“EDE was shown to reduce the tension between the values of H0 (Poulin et al. 2018; Smith et al. 2020) inferred from the CMB data of Planck (Planck Collaboration XI 2016), the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) and redshift-space distortion data of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS; Alam et al. 2017), the…”
MethodTojeiro, R., Ross, A. J., Burden, A., Samushia, L., Manera, M., Percival, W. J., Beutler, F., Brinkmann, J. V., Brownstein, J. R., Cuesta, A. J., et al. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu371 · Cited by 123
“(see e.g. Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999; Kessler et al. 2009; Amanullah et al. 2010; Percival et al. 2010; Reid et al. 2010; Blake et al. 2011a, b, c; Beutler et al. 2011; Conley et al. 2011; Anderson et al. 2012).”
BackgroundSelf-citationConverting nonrelativistic dark matter to radiation
Bringmann, T., Kahlhoefer, F., Schmidt-Hoberg, K., & Walia, P. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.023543 · Cited by 123
Murgia, R., Abellán, G. F., & Poulin, V. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.063502 · Cited by 122
Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Constraints on prerecombination early dark energy
Hill, J. C., Calabrese, E., Aiola, S., Battaglia, N., Bolliet, B., Choi, S. K., Devlin, M. J., Duivenvoorden, A. J., Dunkley, J., Ferraro, S., et al. (2022) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.123536 · Cited by 122
A new life for sterile neutrinos: resolving inconsistencies using hot dark matter
Hamann, J., & Hasenkamp, J. (2013) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/10/044 · Cited by 122
Larger value for H0 by an evolving gravitational constant
Braglia, M., Ballardini, M., Emond, W. T., Finelli, F., Gümrükçüoğlu, A. E., Koyama, K., & Paoletti, D. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.023529 · Cited by 133
“61 [57–59] in combination with measurements from 6dF [60] at zeff 1⁄4 0.”
BackgroundObservational Constraints on Quintessence: Thawing, Tracker, and Scaling models
Chiba, T., de Felice, A., & Tsujikawa, S. (2012) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.083505 · Cited by 82
Large-scale stability and astronomical constraints for coupled dark-energy models
Yang, W., Pan, S., & Barrow, J. D. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.043529 · Cited by 121
Cosmological evolution of light dark photon dark matter
McDermott, S. D., & Witte, S. J. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.063030 · Cited by 121
Quintessential interpretation of the evolving dark energy in light of DESI observations
Tada, Y., & Terada, T. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.l121305 · Cited by 121
Cao, S., Zheng, X., Biesiada, M., Qi, J., Chen, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2017) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730551 · Cited by 120
“For the BAO data, we use the latest measurements of acoustic-scale distance ratio DV (z)/rs(zd) from the 6dFGS (rs(zd)/DV (z = 0.106) = 0.336 ± 0.015), SDSS-MGS A15, page 10 of 17 (DV (z = 0.15)/rs(zd) = (664 ± 25)/152.66), BOSS-LOWZ (DV (z = 0.32)/rs(zd) = (1264±25)/153.19), and BOSS-CMASS (DV (z = 0.57)/rs(zd) = (20…”
MethodInfluentialNew observational constraints onf(R) gravity from cosmic chronometers
Nunes, R. C., Pan, S., Saridakis, E. N., & Abreu, É. M. C. (2017) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/01/005 · Cited by 119
“In our analysis, we adopt the following BAO data to constrain the expansion history of the universe: the measurement from the Six Degree Field Galaxy Survey (6dF) [86], the Main Galaxy Sample of Data Release 7 of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-MGS) [87], the LOWZ and CMASS galaxy samples of the Baryon Oscillation Spec…”
MethodConstraints on the interacting vacuum–geodesic CDM scenario
Martinelli, M., Hogg, N. B., Peirone, S., Bruni, M., & Wands, D. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1915 · Cited by 118
“In addition to the Planck CMB data, we utilize the BAO measurement from the 6dF Galaxy Survey (Beutler et al. 2011), the BAO scale measurement from the SDSS DR7 Main Galaxy Sample (Ross et al. 2015) and the combined BAO and RSD data from the SDSS DR12 consensus release (Alam et al. 2017), together…”
MethodConstraints on a Bianchi type I spacetime extension of the standard Λ CDM model
Akarsu, Ö., Kumar, S., Sharma, S., & Luigi Tedesco, B. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.023532 · Cited by 118
“0150 [105]”
Constraining Dark Matter-Dark Radiation interactions with CMB, BAO, and Lyman-α
Archidiacono, M., Hooper, D., Murgia, R., Bohr, S., Lesgourgues, J., & Viel, M. (2019) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/10/055 · Cited by 127
“106 [93], by SDSS from the MGS galaxy sample at z = 0.”
MethodChallenges of the Standard Cosmological Model
Di Valentino, E. (2022) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe8080399 · Cited by 125
ACOUSTIC SCALE FROM THE ANGULAR POWER SPECTRA OF SDSS-III DR8 PHOTOMETRIC LUMINOUS GALAXIES
Seo, H., Ho, S., White, M. J., Cuesta, A. J., Ross, A. J., Saito, S., Reid, B., Padmanabhan, N., Percival, W. J., de Putter, R., et al. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/761/1/13 · Cited by 117
“…Cole et al. 2005; Hütsi 2006; Tegmark et al. 2006; Percival et al. 2007a,b; Padmanabhan et al. 2007; Blake et al. 2007; Okumura et al. 2008; Estrada et al. 2009; Gaztañaga et al. 2009a,b; Percival et al. 2010; Kazin et al. 2010; Beutler et al. 2011; Crocce et al. 2011; Blake et al. 2011a,b).”
BackgroundDynamical dark energy vs. Λ = const in light of observations
Solà, J., Pérez, J. D. C., & Gómez-Valent, A. (2018) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/121/39001 · Cited by 116
Observational constraints on sign-changeable interaction models and alleviation of the H 0 tension
Pan, S., Yang, W., Singha, C., & Saridakis, E. N. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.083539 · Cited by 116
“106) [94], data from Main Galaxy Sample of Data Release 7 of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-MGS) (zeff = 0.”
MethodDark energy at early times and ACT data: A larger Hubble constant without late-time priors
Poulin, V., Smith, T. L., & Bartlett, A. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.123550 · Cited by 112
“[41] Florian Beutler, Chris Blake, Matthew Colless, D.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Beutler, F., Blake, C., Colless, M., Jones, D. H., Staveley-Smith, L., Campbell, L., Parker, Q., Saunders, W., & Watson, F.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
- Australian Astronomical Observatory (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- Western Kentucky University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Beutler, Florian
- ORCID
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-07-25
- Volume
- 416
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3017-3032
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121951791
- Cited by
- 2,590
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 90 · 2025: 191 · 2024: 228 · 2023: 207 · 2022: 210 · 2021: 236 · 2020: 241 · 2019: 207 · 2018: 176 · 2017: 178 · 2016: 167 · 2015: 131 · 2014: 147 · 2013: 113 · 2012: 61
- FWCI
- 54.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #219
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- Australian National University
- Australian Research Council (DP0208876)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- baryon acoustic oscillations, 6dF Galaxy Survey, local Hubble constant, sound horizon, distance-redshift relation, dark energy equation of state, wallabies, taipan, radio galaxy surveys, cosmological constraints
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
