The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The 6dF Galaxy Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations and the local Hubble constant: 6dFGS: BAOs and the local Hubble constant
Open accessAbstract
We analyse the large-scale correlation function of the 6dF Galaxy Survey (6dFGS) and detect a baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) signal at 105 h−1 Mpc. The 6dFGS BAO detection allows us to constrain the distance–redshift relation at zeff= 0.106. We achieve a distance measure of DV(zeff) = 457 ± 27 Mpc and a measurement of the distance ratio, rs(zd)/DV(zeff) = 0.336 ± 0.015 (4.5 per cent precision), where rs(zd) is the sound horizon at the drag epoch zd. The low-effective redshift of 6dFGS makes it a competitive and independent alternative to Cepheids and low-z supernovae in constraining the Hubble constant. We find a Hubble constant of H0= 67 ± 3.2 km s−1 Mpc−1 (4.8 per cent precision) that depends only on the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe-7 (WMAP-7) calibration of the sound horizon and on the galaxy clustering in 6dFGS. Compared to earlier BAO studies at higher redshift, our analysis is less dependent on other cosmological parameters. The sensitivity to H0 can be used to break the degeneracy between the dark energy equation of state parameter w and H0 in the cosmic microwave background data. We determine that w=−0.97 ± 0.13, using only WMAP-7 and BAO data from both 6dFGS and Percival et al. (2010). We also discuss predictions for the large-scale correlation function of two future wide-angle surveys: the Wide field ASKAP L-band Legacy All-sky Blind surveY (WALLABY) blind H i survey (with the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder, ASKAP) and the proposed Transforming Astronomical Imaging surveys through Polychromatic Analysis of Nebulae (TAIPAN) all-southern-sky optical galaxy survey with the UK Schmidt Telescope. We find that both surveys are very likely to yield detections of the BAO peak, making WALLABY the first radio galaxy survey to do so. We also predict that TAIPAN has the potential to constrain the Hubble constant with 3 per cent precision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SEVEN-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE(WMAP) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Smith, K. M., Dunkley, J., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Nolta, M. R., Page, L., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18 · Cited by 8,802
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary
York, D., Adelman, J., Anderson, J., Anderson, S., Annis, J., Bahcall, N., Bakken, J., Barkhouser, R., Bastian, S., Berman, E., et al. (2000) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/301513 · Cited by 8,368 · cited 1×
“The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; York et al. 2000), and the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS; Colless et al. 2001) were the first redshift surveys which have directly detected the BAO signal.”
MethodFIVE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Dunkley, J., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Limon, M., Page, L., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/330 · Cited by 5,786
THE SEVENTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY
Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agüeros, M. A., Allam, S. S., Prieto, C. A., An, D., Anderson, K. S. J., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 · Cited by 5,341 · cited 1×
“The volume of the 6dF Galaxy Survey is approximately as large as the volume covered by the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey, with a sample density similar to SDSSDR7 (Abazajian et al. 2009).”
MethodThe Design and Implementation of FFTW3
Frigo, M., & Johnson, S. G. (2005) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2004.840301 · Cited by 5,086
Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
Eisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Blanton, M. R., Nichol, R. C., Scranton, R., Seo, H., Tegmark, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/466512 · Cited by 4,641 · cited 9×
“We derive the parameter (Eisenstein et al. 2005) A(zeff) = 100DV (zeff) √ Ωmh2 czeff , (27) which has no dependence on the Hubble constant since DV ∝ h−1.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFinal Results from the Hubble Space Telescope Key Project to Measure the Hubble Constant
Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Gibson, B. K., Ferrarese, L., Kelson, D. D., Sakai, S., Mould, J. R., Robert C. Kennicutt, Jr., Ford, H. C., Graham, J. A., et al. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/320638 · Cited by 3,543
Clustering in real space and in redshift space
Kaiser, N. (1987) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/227.1.1 · Cited by 2,762 · cited 1×
“The model of linear redshift space distortions introduced by Kaiser (1987) is based on the plane parallel approximation.”
MethodEisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Blanton, M. R., Nichol, R. C., Scranton, R., Seo, H., Tegmark, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2005) · Cited by 2,568
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Arnalte-Mur, 2011, MNRAS
- Sanchez, 2008, MNRAS, 390, 1470
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,006
Data-driven reconstruction of the late-time cosmic acceleration with f ( T ) gravity
Ren, X., Wong, T. H. T., Cai, Y.-F., & Saridakis, E. N. (2021) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2021.100812 · Cited by 63
Goldstein, S., Hill, J. C., Iršič, V., & Sherwin, B. D. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.201001 · Cited by 65
Zhang, J.-F., Zhao, M.-M., Li, Y.-H., & Zhang, X. (2015) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/04/038 · Cited by 63
“1) [50], SDSSDR7 (z = 0.”
Post-Planck constraints on interacting vacuum energy
Wang, Y., Wands, D., Zhao, G., & Xu, L. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.023502 · Cited by 63
Large scale structure constraints for a class of f ( R ) theories of gravity
Abebe, A., de la Cruz-Dombriz, Á., & Dunsby, P. K. S. (2013) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.044050 · Cited by 63
Planck 2015 constraints on spatially-flat dynamical dark energy models
Ooba, J., Ratra, B., & Sugiyama, N. (2019) · Astrophysics and Space Science · doi:10.1007/s10509-019-3663-4 · Cited by 63
“4 matter power spectra obtained by the 6dF Galaxy Survey (Beutler et al. 2011), the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (LOWZ and CMASS) (Anderson et al. 2014), and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey main galaxy sample (MGS) (Ross et al. 2015).”
MethodPark, C., & Ratra, B. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.083508 · Cited by 63
Cosmological Parameter Inference with Bayesian Statistics
Padilla, L. E., Téllez-Tovar, L. O., Escamilla, L. A., & Vazquez, J. A. (2021) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe7070213 · Cited by 62
“[63] Beutler F.”
MethodDark degeneracy I: Dynamical or interacting dark energy?
von Marttens, R., Lombriser, L., Kunz, M., Marra, V., Casarini, L., & Alcaniz, J. S. (2020) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2020.100490 · Cited by 62
“• BAO: Following the latest Planck results [6], we use BAO data from the 6dF Galaxy Survey [101] and BOSSDR12 [7].”
MethodCosmological constraints on late-Universe decaying dark matter as a solution to the H0 tension
Clark, S. J., Vattis, K., & Koushiappas, S. M. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.043014 · Cited by 59
Einstein, Planck and Vera Rubin: Relevant Encounters Between the Cosmological and the Quantum Worlds
Salucci, P., Esposito, G. V. M., Lambiase, G., Battista, E., Benetti, M., Bini, D., Boco, L., Sharma, G., Bozza, V., Buoninfante, L., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.603190 · Cited by 63
“the Cosmic Background Radiation anisotropies by Planck Collaboration and the Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation measurements [43, 44, 45, 46].”
MethodModel-independent reconstruction of cosmological accelerated–decelerated phase
Capozzıello, S., Dunsby, P. K. S., & Luongo, O. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3187 · Cited by 62
In search of the dark matter dark energy interaction: a kinematic approach
Mukherjee, A., & Banerjee, N. (2017) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa54c8 · Cited by 64
Benetti, M., Capozzıello, S., & Lambiase, G. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3368 · Cited by 63
“• Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO): we use distance measurements from 6dFGS [66], SDSS-MGS [67], and BOSS DR12 [68] surveys, as considered by the Planck collaboration;”
MethodPlanck 2015 Constraints on the Nonflat ϕCDM Inflation Model
Ooba, J., Ratra, B., & Sugiyama, N. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aadcf3 · Cited by 62
“…Planck 2015 mission (Planck Collaboration 2016a) and the BAO measurements from the matter power spectra obtained by the 6dF Galaxy Survey (6dFGS) (Beutler et al. 2011), the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS; LOWZ and CMASS) (Anderson et al. 2014), and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey…”
MethodConnecting early and late epochs by f(z)CDM cosmography
Benetti, M., & Capozzıello, S. (2019) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/12/008 · Cited by 65
“• Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) distance measurements, using 6dFGS [34], SDSSMGS [35], and BOSS DR12 [36] surveys, as considered by the Planck collaboration;”
MethodCosmological constraints from gas mass fractions of massive, relaxed galaxy clusters
Mantz, A. B., Morris, R. G., Allen, S. W., Canning, R., Baumont, L., Benson, B. A., Bleem, L. E., Ehlert, S. R., Floyd, B. T., Herbonnet, R., et al. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3390
Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Scowcroft, V., Monson, A., Persson, S. E., Seibert, M., Rigby, J. R., Sturch, L. K., & Stetson, P. (2011) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/6/192 · Cited by 61
“The results of Beutler et al. (2011), Komatsu et al. (2011) and Mould (2011) are also interesting in this regard.”
BackgroundChanging the Bayesian prior: Absolute neutrino mass constraints in nonlocal gravity
Dirian, Y. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.083513 · Cited by 59
Generalized emergent dark energy model and the Hubble constant tension
Yang, W., Valentino, E. D., Pan, S., Shafieloo, A., & Li, X. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.063521 · Cited by 61
A critique of holographic dark energy
Colgáin, E. Ó., & Sheikh-Jabbari, M. M. (2021) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac1504 · Cited by 61
Coupled and uncoupled early dark energy, massive neutrinos, and the cosmological tensions
Gómez-Valent, A., Zheng, Z., Amendola, L., WETTERICH, C., & Pettorino, V. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.103522 · Cited by 61
Efficient reconstruction of linear baryon acoustic oscillations in galaxy surveys
Burden, A., Percival, W. J., Manera, M., Cuesta, A. J., Vargas-Magaña, M., & Ho, S. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1965 · Cited by 61
“…measurements of the BAO scale in galaxy surveys have built up a distance ladder, mainly based on monopole measurements constraining DV (z)/rd (Percival et al. 2010; Kazin et al. 2010; Beutler et al. 2011; Blake et al. 2011; Padmanabhan et al. 2012b; Anderson et al. 2012, 2013; Tojeiro et al. 2014).”
MethodCosmological constraints on coupled dark energy
Yang, W., Li, H., Wu, Y., & Lu, J. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/10/007 · Cited by 61
New observational constraints on f(T) cosmology from radio quasars
Qi, J.-Z., Cao, S., Biesiada, M., Zheng, X., & Zhu, Z. (2017) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5069-1 · Cited by 61
Chuang, C.-H., Pellejero-Ibáñez, M., Rodríguez-Torres, S. A., Ross, A. J., Zhao, G., Wang, Y., Cuesta, A. J., Rubiño-Martín, J. A., Prada, F., Alam, S., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1641 · Cited by 61
“…the measurements from VIMOS-VLT Deep Survey (VVDS; Guzzo et al. 2008), 2dFGRS (Percival et al. 2004), Six-degree-Field Galaxy Survey (6dFGS; Beutler et al. 2011, 2012), WiggleZ (Blake et al. 2011a,b, 2012; Contreras et al. 2013), SDSS-II/DR7 (Percival et al. 2010; Chuang et al. 2012;…”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationA gigaparsec-scale local void and the Hubble tension
Ding, Q., Nakama, T., & Wang, Y. (2020) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-020-1531-0 · Cited by 61
Cosmological constraints on an exponential interaction in the dark sector
Yang, W., Pan, S., & Paliathanasis, A. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2780 · Cited by 60
“106) [70], Main Galaxy Sample of Data Release 7 of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-MGS) (zeff = 0.”
BackgroundTesting H0 in acoustic dark energy models with Planck and ACT polarization data
Lin, M., Hu, W., & Raveri, M. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.123523 · Cited by 60
Observational constraints in accelerated emergent f(Q) gravity model
Shekh, S. H., Bouali, A., Mustafa, G., Pradhan, A., & Javed, F. (2023) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/acb631 · Cited by 60
Combining Planck data with large scale structure information gives a strong neutrino mass constraint
Riemer–Sørensen, S., Parkinson, D., & Davis, T. M. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.103505 · Cited by 60
Cosmic microwave background constraints on secret interactions among sterile neutrinos
Forastieri, F., Lattanzi, M., Mangano, G., Mirizzi, A., Natoli, P., & Saviano, N. (2017) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/07/038 · Cited by 60
“We also consider geometrical information coming from baryon acoustic oscillations; in particular we make use of the BAO results from the 6dF Galaxy Survey [44], from the BOSS DR11”
MethodPrice of shifting the Hubble constant
Evslin, J., Sen, A. A., & Ruchika, R. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.103511 · Cited by 60
“We combine isotropic BAO measurements from the 6dF Survey [32], at an effective redshift of z = 0.”
MethodInfluentialBAO angular scale atzeff= 0.11 with the SDSS blue galaxies
de Carvalho, E., Bernui, A., Avila, F., Novaes, C. P., & Nogueira-Cavalcante, J. P. (2021) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039936 · Cited by 60
Light sterile neutrinos in cosmology and short-baseline oscillation experiments
Gariazzo, S., Carlo Giunti, A., & Laveder, M. (2013) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2013)211 · Cited by 59
“1 obtained in [60] using data from the 6dF Galaxy Survey (6dFGS) [61].”
MethodSterile neutrino self-interactions: H 0 tension and short-baseline anomalies
Archidiacono, M., Gariazzo, S., Giunti, C., Hannestad, S., & Tram, T. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/12/029 · Cited by 60
Ultralight scalar decay and the Hubble tension
Gonzalez, M., Hertzberg, M. P., & Rompineve, F. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/10/028 · Cited by 59
“106 [34], from the MGS galaxy sample of SDSS at z = 0.”
BackgroundEarly dark sector, the Hubble tension, and the swampland
McDonough, E., Lin, M., Hill, J. C., Hu, W., & Zhou, S. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.043525 · Cited by 59
Late-time interacting cosmologies and the Hubble constant tension
Gariazzo, S., Valentino, E. D., Mena, O., & Nunes, R. C. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.023530 · Cited by 61
Testing the dark energy consistency with geometry and growth
Ruiz, E. J., & Dragan Huterer, A. (2015) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.063009 · Cited by 59
A search for sterile neutrinos with the latest cosmological observations
Feng, L., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. (2017) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4986-3 · Cited by 69
Observational constraints on dark matter–dark energy scattering cross section
Kumar, S., & Nunes, R. C. (2017) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5334-3 · Cited by 59
Guo, R.-Y., Zhang, J., & Zhang, X. (2018) · Chinese Physics C · doi:10.1088/1674-1137/42/9/095103 · Cited by 59
Independent cosmological constraints from high-z H ii galaxies
González-Morán, A. L., Chávez, R., Terlevich, R. J., Terlevich, E., Bresolin, F., Fernández-Arenas, D., Plionis, M., Basilakos, S., Melnick, J., & Telles, E. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1577 · Cited by 59
“…then a large number of dedicated surveys have been used to measure BAOs, among which the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey (Blake et al. 2011), the 6dFGS (Beutler et al. 2011) and the SDSS Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) of SDSS-III (Eisenstein et al. 2011; Anderson et al. 2014; Aubourg…”
MethodCan dark neutrino interactions phase out the Hubble tension?
Ghosh, S., Khatri, R., & Roy, T. S. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.123544 · Cited by 57
Wang, Y., Zhao, G., Zhao, C., Philcox, O. H. E., Alam, S., Tamone, A., de Mattia, A., Ross, A. J., Raichoor, A., Burtin, E., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2593 · Cited by 59
“…contours in Figure 13) (Ata et al. 2018) using the isotropic BAO measurements using MGS (Ross et al. 2015) and 6dFGRS c© 2020 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–15 (Beutler et al. 2011) galaxy samples; the anisotropic BAO measurement in three z bins from BOSS DR12 (Alam et al. 2016); the isotropic BAO…”
MethodInfluentialProspects for Constraining Interacting Dark Energy Models with 21 cm Intensity Mapping Experiments
Zhang, M., Wang, B., Wu, P.-J., Qi, J.-Z., Xu, Y., Zhang, J., & Zhang, X. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0ef5 · Cited by 58
Alleviating both H0 and S8 tensions: Early dark energy lifts the CMB-lockdown on ultralight axion
Ye, G., Zhang, J., & Yun-song Piao, A. (2023) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137770 · Cited by 69
Bargiacchi, G., Dainotti, M. G., Nagataki, S., & Capozziello, S. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad763 · Cited by 58
Robust model comparison disfavors power law cosmology
Shafer, D. L. (2015) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.103516 · Cited by 58
How clustering dark energy affects matter perturbations
Mehrabi, A., Basilakos, S., & Pace, F. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1478 · Cited by 62
Coupled dark energy with perturbed Hubble expansion rate
Yang, W., & Xu, L. (2014) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.083532 · Cited by 58
Parametric reconstruction of the cosmological jerk from diverse observational data sets
Mukherjee, A., & Banerjee, N. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.043002 · Cited by 64
Mueller, E.-M., Percival, W. J., Linder, E. V., Alam, S., Zhao, G., Sánchez, A. G., Beutler, F., & Brinkmann, J. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3232 · Cited by 57
“MNRAS 000, 1–11 (2016) We do not use the BAO measurements of 6dFGS Beutler et al. (2011) and MGS since these are likely correlated with the RSD measurement of the corresponding survey.”
MethodSelf-citationThe transverse baryonic acoustic scale from the SDSS DR11 galaxies
Carvalho, G. C., Bernui, A., Benetti, M., Carvalho, J. C., Carvalho, G. C., & Alcaniz, J. S. (2020) · Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2020.102432 · Cited by 58
The H0 and σ8 tensions and the scale invariant spectrum
Benetti, M., Graef, L. L., & Alcaniz, J. S. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/07/066 · Cited by 58
“2 We extend the base dataset with BAO 2PCF data obtained from the 6dF Galaxy Survey (6dFGS) [42], SDSS DR7 Main Galaxy Sample (SDSS- MGS) galaxies [43], BOSS galaxy samples, LOWZ and CMASS [44].”
MethodAkarsu, Ö., Katırcı, N., Kumar, S., Nunes, R. C., & Sami, M. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.063522 · Cited by 58
“We also use the BAO measurements from (i) the Six Degree Field Galaxy Survey [72], (ii) the Main Galaxy Sample of Data Release 7 of Sloan Digital Sky Survey [73], (iii) the LOWZ and CMASS galaxy samples of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) [74], and (iv) the distribution of the LymanForest in the BOSS…”
MethodConstraints on neutrino masses from Planck and Galaxy clustering data
Giusarma, E., de Putter, R., Ho, S., & Mena, O. (2013) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.063515 · Cited by 57
Primordial power spectra for curved inflating universes
Handley, W. J. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.123517 · Cited by 57
The Taipan Galaxy Survey: scientific goals and observing strategy
da Cunha, E., Hopkins, A., Colless, M., Taylor, E., Blake, C., Howlett, C., Magoulas, C., Lucey, J. R., Lagos, C. D. P., Kuehn, K. (., et al. (2017) · Figshare · Cited by 57
Self-citationBarrow Entropy Cosmology: an observational approach with a hint of stability analysis
Leon, G., Magaña, J., Hernández-Almada, A., García-Aspeitia, M. A., Verdugo, T., & Motta, V. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/12/032 · Cited by 50
How closely do baryons follow dark matter on large scales?
Angulo, R. E., Hahn, O., & Abel, T. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1135 · Cited by 57
“This has indeed been achieved observationally with increasing accuracy (e.g. Cole et al. 2005; Eisenstein et al. 2005; Blake et al. 2011; Beutler et al. 2011) and further measurements have been proposed using virtually any known tracer of the matter density field in the Universe: including the…”
MethodObservational constraints on non-flat dynamical dark energy cosmological models
Farooq, O., Mania, D., & Ratra, B. (2015) · Astrophysics and Space Science · doi:10.1007/s10509-015-2319-2 · Cited by 57
Acceleration of the universe: a reconstruction of the effective equation of state
Mukherjee, A. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw964 · Cited by 59
“Here we have taken three mutually uncorrelated measurements of rs(zd) DV (z) , the result of 6dF Galax Survey at redshift z = 0.106 (Beutler et al. 2011), and the results of Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) at redshift z = 0.32 (BOSS LOWZ) and at redshift z = 0.57 (BOSS CMASS)…”
ResultInfluentialIs there a concordance value forH0?
Luković, V. V., D’Agostino, R., & Vittorio, N. (2016) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628217 · Cited by 56
“We used the measurements from the 6dFGS (Beutler et al. 2011), the SDSS DR7 (Ross et al. 2015), and the BOSS DR11 (Anderson et al. 2014) samples and the Lyα forest measurements from BOSS DR11 (Delubac et al. 2015; Font-Ribera et al. 2014).”
MethodTesting AdS early dark energy with Planck, SPTpol, and LSS data
Jiang, J.-Q., & Yun-song Piao, A. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.103524 · Cited by 53
“• BAO: low redshift BAO measured by 6DF [62] in z = 0.”
MethodNiedermann, F., & Sloth, M. S. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.063509 · Cited by 77
“This statement relies on adding the effective field theory of LSS [83] applied to BOSS data [2, 84] to further constrain the model.”
MethodUnveiling dark fifth forces with linear cosmology
Archidiacono, M., Castorina, E., Redigolo, D., & Salvioni, E. (2022) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/10/074 · Cited by 56
Phantom Cosmological Model with Observational Constraints in f(Q)$f(Q)$ Gravity
Narawade, S. A., & Mishra, B. (2023) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.202200626 · Cited by 56
Marsh, D. J. E., Macaulay, E., Trebitsch, M., & Ferreira, P. G. (2012) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.103514 · Cited by 56
Tension in the void: cosmic rulers strain inhomogeneous cosmologies
Zumalacárregui, M., García-Bellido, J., & Ruiz-Lapuente, P. (2012) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/10/009 · Cited by 56
Hennig, C., Mohr, J., Zenteno, A., Desai, S., Dietrich, J., Bocquet, S., Strazzullo, V., Saro, A., Abbott, T., Abdalla, F., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx175 · Cited by 44
“…al. (2015) analysis combines this SPT cluster dataset with CMB anisotropy constraints from WMAP9 (Hinshaw et al. 2013), distance measurements from supernovae (Suzuki et al. 2012) and observations of baryon acoustic oscillations (Beutler et al. 2011; Padmanabhan et al. 2012; Anderson et al. 2012).”
MethodMetastable dark energy with radioactive-like decay
Shafieloo, A., Hazra, D. K., Varun Sahni, A., & Starobinsky, A. A. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2481 · Cited by 63
“(ii) Four BAO datasets: SDSS DR7 (z = 0.35) (Percival et al. 2010), BOSS DR9 (z = 0.57) (Anderson et al. 2013), 6DF (z = 0.106) (Beutler et al. 2011) and SDSS DR11 BAO measurements of H(z) data at z = 2.34 (Delubac et al. 2015).”
InfluentialPartially acoustic dark matter cosmology and cosmological constraints
Raveri, M., Hu, W., Hoffman, T., & Wang, L.-T. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.103501 · Cited by 56
Cosmological data favor Galileon ghost condensate over ΛCDM
Peirone, S., Benevento, G., Frusciante, N., & Tsujikawa, S. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.063540 · Cited by 56
Exploring dark matter microphysics with galaxy surveys
Escudero, M., Mena, O., Vincent, A. C., Wilkinson, R. J., & Bœhm, C. (2015) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/9/034 · Cited by 56
Dark energy and dark matter from an additional adiabatic fluid
Dunsby, P. K. S., Luongo, O., & Reverberi, L. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.083525 · Cited by 55
Zhao, Z.-W., Li, Z.-X., Qi, J.-Z., Gao, H., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb8ce · Cited by 55
“…data, we use the “Planck distance priors” derived from the Planck 2018 data release (Chen et al. 2019), and the BAO measurements from 6dFGS at zeff=0.106 (Beutler et al. 2011), SDSS-MGS at zeff=0.15 (Ross et al. 2015), and BOSS-DR12 at zeff=0.38, 0.51, and 0.61 (BOSS Collaboration et al. 2017).”
MethodInfluentialModel-independent calibrations of gamma-ray bursts using machine learning
Luongo, O., & Muccino, M. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab795 · Cited by 55
Zhao, C., Variu, A., He, M., Forero-Sánchez, D., Tamone, A., Chuang, C.-H., Kitaura, F.-S., TAO, C., Yu, J., Kneib, J., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac390 · Cited by 55
A Step in understanding the S 8 tension
Joseph, M., Aloni, D., Schmaltz, M., Sivarajan, E. N., & Weiner, N. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.023520 · Cited by 55
Farren, G. S., Krolewski, A., MacCrann, N., Ferraro, S., Abril-Cabezas, I., An, R., Atkins, Z., Battaglia, N., Bond, J. R., Calabrese, E., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad31a5 · Cited by 55
“The data we include measure the BAO signature in the clustering of galaxies with samples spanning redshifts up to z ≃ 1, including 6dFGS (Beutler et al. 2011), SDSS DR7 Main Galaxy Sample (MGS; Ross et al. 2015), BOSS DR12 LRGs (Alam et al. 2017), and eBOSS DR16 LRGs (Alam et al. 2021).”
MethodAIC, BIC, Bayesian evidence against the interacting dark energy model
Marek Szydlowski, A., Krawiec, A., Kurek, A., & Kamionka, M. (2015) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3236-1 · Cited by 55
Starobinsky cosmological model in Palatini formalism
Stachowski, A., Szydłowski, M., & Borowiec, A. (2017) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4981-8 · Cited by 55
“1 [52], and WiggleZ measurements at redshift z = 0.”
BackgroundTesting dark energy models in the light of $$\sigma _8$$ σ 8 tension
Lambiase, G., Mohanty, S., Narang, A., & Parashari, P. (2019) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6634-6 · Cited by 55
de Haro, J., Yang, W., & Pan, S. (2019) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/01/023 · Cited by 55
“• BAO: Along with the CMB measurements, we consider the Baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) distance measurements from diverse astronomical missions, namely, 6dF Galaxy Survey (6dFGS) [92]; Main Galaxy Sample of Data Release 7 of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-MGS) [93]; CMASS and LOWZ samples from the latest Data Relea…”
BackgroundMethodMartinelli, M., & Tutusaus, I. (2019) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym11080986 · Cited by 55
“c measurements the observables used are c/(H(z)r d) and r(z)/r d, corresponding to the transverse and radial directions, respectively. We use the isotropic measurements provided by 6dFGS at z = 0.106 [87] and by SDSS - MGS at z = 0.15 [88], and the anisotropic final results of BOSS DR12 at z = 0.38,0.51,0.61 [89] with…”
MethodInfluentialThe observational status of Galileon gravity after Planck
Barreira, A. (2016) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 55
Planck 2015 Constraints on the Non-flat XCDM Inflation Model
Ooba, J., Ratra, B., & Sugiyama, N. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaec6f · Cited by 55
Väliviita, J., & Palmgren, E. (2015) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/07/015 · Cited by 54
Primordial gravitational waves and the H0 -tension problem
Graef, L. L., Benetti, M., & Alcaniz, J. S. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.043519 · Cited by 51
Fast and credible likelihood-free cosmology with truncated marginal neural ratio estimation
Cole, A., Miller, B., Witte, S. J., Cai, M. X., Grootes, M. W., Nattino, F., & Weniger, C. (2022) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/004 · Cited by 54
“15 , with sensitivities proportional to the 6dF Galaxy Survey [79], Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-III) Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) data release 11 and CMASS data [80], and SDSS Main Galaxy Sample [81] respectively.”
MethodImplications of the S8 tension for decaying dark matter with warm decay products
Abellán, G. F., Murgia, R., Poulin, V., & Lavalle, J. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.063525 · Cited by 78
Gamma-ray bursts, supernovae Ia, and baryon acoustic oscillations: A binned cosmological analysis
Dainotti, M. G., Sarracino, G., & Capozzıello, S. (2022) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan · doi:10.1093/pasj/psac057 · Cited by 54
“The BAO based measurements used in our work are taken from the 6dF Galaxy Survey (Beutler et al. 2011), the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey (Blake et al. 2011), and the latest Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data release (in particular, the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS), and the extended Baryon Oscillation…”
MethodInfluentialToda, Y., Giarè, W., Özülker, E., Valentino, E. D., & Vagnozzi, S. (2024) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101676 · Cited by 53
Baryon acoustic oscillation theory and modelling systematics for the DESI 2024 results
Chen, S.-F., Howlett, C., White, M. J., McDonald, P., Ross, A. J., Seo, H., Padmanabhan, N., Aguilar, J., Ahlen, S. P., Alam, S., et al. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2090 · Cited by 54
The foreground wedge and 21-cm BAO surveys
Seo, H., & Hirata, C. M. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2806 · Cited by 54
“…as biased tracers of the underlying dark matter (e.g. Cole et al. 2005; Eisenstein et al. 2005; Percival et al. 2007, 2010; Blake et al. 2011a,b; Beutler et al. 2011; Padmanabhan et al. 2012; Xu et al. 2012; Seo et al. 2012; Kazin et al. 2013; Anderson et al. 2014; Kazin et al. 2014;…”
BackgroundTheoretical Systematics of Future Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Surveys
Ding, Z., Seo, H., Vlah, Z., Feng, Y., Schmittfull, M., & Beutler, F. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1413 · Cited by 54
“…et al. 2005), multiple large-scale galaxy surveys have been carried out to improve the detection precision, e.g. 6-deg Field Galaxy Survey (6dFGS) (Beutler et al. 2011), WiggleZ dark energy survey (Blake et al. 2011), and SDSSIII Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) (e.g. Dawson et al.…”
Self-citationCosmological bounds on dark matter-photon coupling
Kumar, S., Nunes, R. C., & Yadav, S. K. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.043521 · Cited by 54
“BAO: The baryon acoustic oscillation measurements from the Six Degree Field Galaxy Survey (6dF) [42], the Main Galaxy Sample of Data Release 7 of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-MGS) [43], the LOWZ and CMASS galaxy samples of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS-LOWZ and BOSS-CMASS, respectively) [44], and…”
MethodLarge-scale (in) stability analysis of an exactly solved coupled dark-energy model
Yang, W., Pan, S., Herrera, R., & Chakraborty, S. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.043517 · Cited by 54
“106 [80], the Main Galaxy Sample of Data Release 7 of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-MGS)measurement at zeff = 0.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Beutler, F., Blake, C., Colless, M., Jones, D. H., Staveley-Smith, L., Campbell, L., Parker, Q., Saunders, W., & Watson, F.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
- Australian Astronomical Observatory (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- Western Kentucky University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Beutler, Florian
- ORCID
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-07-25
- Volume
- 416
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3017-3032
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121951791
- Cited by
- 2,590
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 90 · 2025: 191 · 2024: 228 · 2023: 207 · 2022: 210 · 2021: 236 · 2020: 241 · 2019: 207 · 2018: 176 · 2017: 178 · 2016: 167 · 2015: 131 · 2014: 147 · 2013: 113 · 2012: 61
- FWCI
- 54.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #219
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- Australian National University
- Australian Research Council (DP0208876)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- baryon acoustic oscillations, 6dF Galaxy Survey, local Hubble constant, sound horizon, distance-redshift relation, dark energy equation of state, wallabies, taipan, radio galaxy surveys, cosmological constraints
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
