Cited by 63Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlOcular Infections and Treatments

Canine ocular onchocerciasis in the United States: two new cases and a review of the literature

Zarfoss, Mitzi K., Dubielzig, Richard R., Eberhard, Mark L., Schmidt, Kristiane S.·2005·Veterinary Ophthalmology

Abstract

Since 1991, 53 cases of canine ocular onchocerciasis have been reported in the literature worldwide, 43 of these were from Greece, five from Hungary, and five from the western United States. Information on the histopathologic features of canine ocular onchocerciasis is limited. We describe the histopathologic features of canine ocular onchocerciasis in two dogs from California that presented clinically with firm episcleral nodules and uveitis unilaterally. Pertinent literature and pathogenesis are reviewed; recognizable clinical features and treatment are discussed. The cases presented were diagnosed via histopathology of the enucleated globes and episcleral granulomas at the Comparative Ocular Pathology Laboratory of Wisconsin (COPLOW). Positive identification of adult Onchocerca within episcleral granulomas was made based on light‐microscopy features. Histopathologic examination of both globes revealed episcleral parasites surrounded by granulomas containing few to moderate numbers of eosinophils. Other sequelae, in both cases, included lymphoplasmacytic uveitis, preiridal fibrovascular membranes, peripheral anterior synechiae, retinal degeneration, and optic nerve head cupping. Both male and female worms were present, as were in utero microfilariae in both cases. Worms in both cases were tentatively identified as Onchocerca lienalis. Ocular onchocerciasis should be a differential consideration in cases of canine conjunctival nodules or periorbital swelling, particularly in dogs from the western United States.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2005.00348.x

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Onchocerca lupi causes canine and human infestation in Europe and overseas.

    “The recent finding of Onchocerca lupi causing canine and human infestation in Europe and overseas renders the picture of VBH even more complicated.”

    From Vector-borne helminths of dogs and humans in Europe (2013) · cites this paper as [30]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zarfoss, M. K., Dubielzig, R. R., Eberhard, M. L., & Schmidt, K. S.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Dubielzig, Richard R.
Venue
Veterinary Ophthalmology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
51-57
ISSN
  • 1463-5216 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-5224
OpenAlex
W1996116443
Cited by
63
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
Keywords
Onchocerca lienalis, Onchocerca volvulus, uveitis, conjunctival nodules, histopathology, microfilariae, retinal degeneration, optic nerve head cupping, differential diagnosis, dogs
MeSH terms
Animals, Diagnosis, Differential, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Male, Onchocerca, Onchocerciasis, Ocular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review