Cited by 134Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Neuroimaging and Depression: Current Status and Unresolved Issues

Gotlib, Ian H., Hamilton, J. Paul·2008·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Major depression is among the most debilitating, prevalent, and recurrent of all psychiatric disorders. Over the past decade, investigators have examined the neural mechanisms associated with this disorder. In this article we present an overview of neuroimaging research that has assessed the structure and functioning of the amygdala, subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in major depression. We then describe results of studies that have attempted to elucidate the nature of the relations among these brain structures. The picture that emerges from these investigations is one in which heightened activity in limbic structures that underlie the experience and expression of emotion dampens activation in dorsal cortical structures that are involved in affect regulation, reducing their ability to influence limbic activation. We conclude by highlighting unresolved issues concerning the roles of these structures in depression and their relation to specific symptoms of this disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00567.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinical depression is marked by structural and functional changes in subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, although it involves many symptoms beyond sadness.

    “Clinical depression is marked by structural and functional changes in sACC (see Gotlib & Hamilton 2008 for a review), although clinical depression involves many symptoms above and beyond the experience of sadness (Coyne 1994).”

    From The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review (2012) · cites this paper as Gotlib & Hamilton 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gotlib, I. H., & Hamilton, J. P.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Gotlib, Ian H.
  • Hamilton, J. Paul
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2008-04
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
159-163
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2161781433
Cited by
134
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
major depressive disorder, amygdala, subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, limbic system, emotion regulation, neurobiology of depression, emotional processing, brain structure-function relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review