The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Superordinate Identification, Subgroup Identification, and Justice Concerns: Is Separatism the Problem; Is Assimilation the Answer?
Abstract
The diversity of American society raises concerns about whether authorities can maintain social cohesion amid competing interests and values The group-value model of justice suggests that authorities function more effectively when they are perceived as fair (e g, benevolent, neutral, and respectful) However, such relational evaluations may be effective only if authorities represent a group with which people identify In a diverse society, subgroup memberships may assume special importance People who identify predominantly with a subgroup may focus on instrumental issues when evaluating a superordinate-group authority, and conflicts with that authority may escalate if those people do not receive favorable outcomes Results indicate that subgroup identification creates problems for authorities only when people have strong subgroup identification and weak superordinate-group identification As long as people identify strongly with the superordinate group, even if they also identify strongly with their subgroup, relational issues will dominate reactions to authorities
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988) · Critical Issues in Social Justice · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4 · Cited by 6,585
Self-citationEthnic identity in adolescents and adults: Review of research.
Phinney, J. S. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.499 · Cited by 3,798
A Relational Model of Authority in Groups
Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60283-x · Cited by 2,977
Self-citationThe common ingroup identity model: recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias.
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792779343000004 · Cited by 1,559
Cited by
What Differences Make a Difference?: The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations
Mannix, E., & Neale, M. A. (2005) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x · Cited by 1,276
Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments
van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(02)80003-x · Cited by 913
Self-citationThe Psychology of Legitimacy: A Relational Perspective on Voluntary Deference to Authorities
Tyler, T. R. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_4 · Cited by 755
Self-citationThe social psychology of protest
van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2013) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392113479314 · Cited by 740
Do Fair Procedures Matter? The Effect of Procedural Justice on Spouse Assault
Paternoster, R., Bachman, R., Brame, R., & Sherman, L. W. (1997) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.2307/3054098 · Cited by 588
The impact of multiculturalism versus color-blindness on racial bias
Richeson, J. A., & Nussbaum, R. J. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.09.002 · Cited by 562
Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2004) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(04)36001-6 · Cited by 650
Haslam, S. A., Eggins, R. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (2003) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317903321208907 · Cited by 362
VOICE, CONTROL, AND BELONGING: The Double-Edged Sword of Procedural Fairness
MacCoun, R. J. (2005) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115958 · Cited by 343
“…interesting finding is that process effects are weaker for citizens who identify strongly with a subordinate group but weakly with a superordinate group; e.g., minority “separatists” as opposed to “assimilationists” (Huo et al., 1996) – an effect that is discussed in greater detail later.”
BackgroundUnderstanding Cooperation With Police in a Diverse Society
Murphy, K., & Cherney, A. (2012) · British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azr065 · Cited by 295
Murphy, K., & Cherney, A. (2011) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/0004865811405260 · Cited by 237
Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2010) · Handbook of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002029 · Cited by 218
Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams.
Homan, A. C., Gündemir, S., Buengeler, C., & van Kleef, G. A. (2020) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000482 · Cited by 217
Keys to motivating tomorrow's workforce
Latham, G. P., & Ernst, C. T. (2006) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.03.014 · Cited by 147
Group identity and intergroup relations The common in-group identity model
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Kafati, G. (2004) · Advances in Group Processes · doi:10.1016/s0882-6145(00)17002-x · Cited by 130
Aspiring to mitigate climate change: superordinate identity in global climate negotiations.
Batalha, L., & Reynolds, K. J. (2012) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00896.x · Cited by 53
(2009) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Huo, Y. J., Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-45
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2128833583
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 52.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
