Cited by 1,051Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and Testing

Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task

Costa, Albert, Hernández, Mireia, Sebastián-Gallés, Núria·2008·Cognition

Abstract

The need of bilinguals to continuously control two languages during speech production may exert general effects on their attentional networks. To explore this issue we compared the performance of bilinguals and monolinguals in the attentional network task (ANT) developed by Fan et al. [Fan, J., McCandliss, B.D. Sommer, T., Raz, A., Posner, M.I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340-347]. This task is supposed to tap into three different attentional networks: alerting, orienting and executive control. The results revealed that bilingual participants were not only faster in performing the task, but also more efficient in the alerting and executive control networks. In particular, bilinguals were aided more by the presentation of an alerting cue, and were also better at resolving conflicting information. Furthermore, bilinguals experienced a reduced switching cost between the different type of trials compared to monolinguals. These results show that bilingualism exerts an influence in the attainment of efficient attentional mechanisms by young adults that are supposed to be at the peak of their attentional capabilities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.013

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This pattern-bilingual advantage on conflict tasks and no difference on non-conflict tasks-has been replicated in children and adults with flanker, theory of mind, and Simon tasks.

    “This pattern has been confirmed in studies of both children and adults using a flanker task (children: [74, 75]), theory of mind task (children: [76, 77]; adults: [78]), Simon task (children: [79]; adults: [44]).”

    From Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain (2012) · cites this paper as [75]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costa, A., Hernández, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N.
Affiliations
Parc Científic de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Costa, Albert
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
106
Issue
1
Pages
59-86
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090678998
Cited by
1,051
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 95 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 54
FWCI
13.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
bilingualism, attentional networks, attentional control, alerting, orienting, executive function, conflict resolution, task switching, bilingual advantage, language control, attentional efficiency
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Attention, Conflict, Psychological, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Problem Solving, Reaction Time, Reversal Learning, Multilingualism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review