CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 517Names, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ethnic Discrimination in Germany’s Labour Market: A Field Experiment

Kaas, Leo, Manger, Christian·2012·German Economic Review
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0475.2011.00538.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract This paper studies ethnic discrimination in Germany’s labour market with a correspondence test. We send two similar applications to each of 528 advertisements for student internships, one with a Turkish-sounding and one with a German-sounding name. A German name raises the average probability of a callback by about 14%. Differential treatment is particularly strong and significant in smaller firms at which the applicant with the German name receives 24% more callbacks. Discrimination disappears when we restrict our sample to applications including reference letters which contain favourable information about the candidate’s personality. We interpret this finding as evidence for statistical discrimination.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-0475.2011.00538.x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bauer, 2000, Immigration Policy, Assimilation of Immigrants and Natives' Sentiments Towards Immigrants, Swedish Economic Policy Review, 7, 11
  2. Fertig, 2010, Attitudes Towards Foreigners and Jews in Germany, Review of Economics of the Household
  3. Isserstedt, 2010, Die Wirtschaftliche und Soziale Lage der Studierenden in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 2009
  4. Statistisches Bundesamt, 2010, Bevoelkerung und Erwerbstaetigkeit. Bevoelkerung mit Migrationshintergrund - Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2009. Fachserie 1, Reihe 2.2
  5. Weitzel, 2010, Recruiting Trends 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 517

Related

Metadata

Authors
Kaas, L., & Manger, C.
Affiliations
University of Konstanz (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Kaas, Leo
  • Manger, Christian
ORCID
Manger, Christian
Venue
German Economic Review
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Published
2012-02-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
1-20
ISSN
  • 1465-6485 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0475
DOI
10.1111/j.1468-0475.2011.00538.x
OpenAlex
W1906367169
Cited by
509
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 16
FWCI
86.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 1308 d)
Locations
  • German Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
ethnic discrimination, employment discrimination, correspondence test, name-based discrimination, callbacks, student internships, firm size, letters of recommendation, statistical discrimination, Germany

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review