Cited by 20Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Parent-child Communication, Social Norms, and the Development of Cyber Aggression in Early Adolescence

Open access
Bullo, Anna, Schulz, Peter J.·2022·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

To understand the development of cyber aggression during adolescence, it is important to consider the temporal variability of its potential predictors. This study uses a four-wave survey to investigate how changes in peer norms, parental norms, and parental communication are associated with two-year trajectories of online peer aggression. The sample includes 1521 Swiss middle school students (M age T1 = 11.54, SD = 0.40; 48% female). The results showed that over time a better parental communication quality and anti-aggression norms predicted lower rates and slower development of cyber aggression. Moreover, parental variables emerged as a quite stable deterrent of aggressive conduct. Although entrance into adolescence is characterized by the rise of peer influence, results from this study suggest that parents maintain an important protective role.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-022-01625-1

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parental monitoring and control strategies with clear boundaries and open communication are more effective, while excessive monitoring without open communication can weaken the parent-child relationship and reduce children's willingness to disclose online concerns.

    “Research highlights that setting clear boundaries and maintaining open communication increases the effectiveness of these measures. Parents can implement strategies such as restricting access to certain websites, monitoring online activity, and setting time limits for device usage. However, building trust through honest discussions about online safety is critical. Excessive monitoring without open”

    From The Impact of Social Media & Technology on Child and Adolescent Mental Health (2025) · cites this paper as [110]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Open and supportive communication between parents and children is critical in reducing cyberbullying and online aggression.

    “Open and supportive communication between parents and children is critical in reducing cyberbullying and online aggression.”

    From The Impact of Social Media & Technology on Child and Adolescent Mental Health (2025) · cites this paper as [110]

    The Discussion and Conclusion report that better parent-child communication was associated with less frequent cyber aggression and a less steep increase during early adolescence. They describe communication as a preventive factor, but the study does not establish that improving communication causes a reduction in aggression; the claim’s unqualified wording is stronger than the evidence. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cialdini, R. (2008). Influence: Science and Practice (5th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
  2. Itō, M., Horst, H., & Bittani, M. (eds) (2009) Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/26078.
  3. Schulman HC Rhodes N Davidson E Ralston R Borghetti L Morr L The state of the field of social norms research International Journal of Communication 2017 11 1192 1213

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bullo, A., & Schulz, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
  • Ewha Womans University (KR)
Corresponding author
Schulz, Peter J.
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2022-05-20
Volume
51
Issue
9
Pages
1774-1786
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W4280493915
Cited by
19
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubliCatt (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
online aggression, parent-child communication, social norms, parental norms, early adolescence, peer influence, developmental trajectories, junior high school students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Aggression, Communication, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Peer Group, Social Norms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review