Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unbroken mirror neurons in autism spectrum disorders

Fan, Yang‐Teng, Decety, Jean, Yang, Chia‐Yen, Liu, Ji‐Lin, Cheng, Yawei·2010·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: The ‘broken mirror’ theory of autism, which proposes that a dysfunction of the human mirror neuron system (MNS) is responsible for the core social and cognitive deficits in individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), has received considerable attention despite weak empirical evidence. Methods: In this electroencephalographic study, we examined mu suppression, as an indicator of sensorimotor resonance, concurrent with oculomotor performance while individuals ( n = 20) with ASD and control participants ( n = 20) either executed hand actions or observed hand actions or a moving dot. No difference in visual attention between groups was found as indicated by fixation duration and normalized fixation number on the presented stimuli. Results: The mu suppression over the sensorimotor cortex was significantly affected by experimental conditions, but not by group membership, nor by the interaction between groups and conditions. Individuals with ASD, similar to the controls, exhibited stronger mu suppression when watching hand actions relative to a moving dot. Notably, participants with ASD failed to imitate the observed actions while their mu suppression indicating the MNS activity was intact. In addition, the mu suppression during the observation of hand actions was positively associated with the communication competence of individuals with ASD. Conclusion: Our study clearly challenges the broken mirror theory of autism. The functioning of the mirror neuron system might be preserved in individuals with ASD to a certain degree. Less mu suppression to action observation coupled with more communicational severity can reflect the symptom heterogeneity of ASD. Additional research needs to be done, and more caution should be used when reaching out to the media.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02269.x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1097/00001756-199911260-00001 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/brain/awm171 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1073/pnas.0706273104 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.011 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002113 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1097/01.wnr.0000223393.59328.21 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01262-5 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.004 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/cercor/bhj069 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.022 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/S0166-2236(96)10065-5 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.rasd.2009.11.004 · DOI
  14. 10.1001/archpsyc.59.9.809 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04769.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.03.010 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1093/scan/nsl022 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.010 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1007/BF01487259 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.rasd.2008.09.004 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.020 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.04.005 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01260-0 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1007/BF00227301 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01843.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01843.x · Paper page
  27. 10.1080/02643290701669703 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.tics.2008.03.005 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1023/A:1022685731726 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.022 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.06.010 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1023/B:JADD.0000029551.56735.3a · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00014-8 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Fan, Y., Decety, J., Yang, C., Liu, J., & Cheng, Y.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-08-12
Volume
51
Issue
9
Pages
981-988
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W1591854335
Cited by
197
References
16
FWCI
20.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unbroken mirror neurons in autism spectrum disorders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02269.x
The paper
Fan, Y., Decety, J., Yang, C., Liu, J., & Cheng, Y. (2010). Unbroken mirror neurons in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02269.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.