Cited by 254Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Childhood attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder as an extreme of a continuous trait: a quantitative genetic study of 8,500 twin pairs

Open access
Larsson, Henrik, Anckarsater, Henrik, Råstam, Maria, Chang, Zheng, Lichtenstein, Paul·2012·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Although the clinical utility of categorically defined attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is well established, there is also strong evidence supporting the notion of ADHD as an extreme of a continuous trait. Nevertheless, the question of whether the etiology is the same for different levels of DSM–IV ADHD symptoms remains to be investigated. The aim of this study was to assess genetic links between the extreme and the subthreshold range of ADHD symptoms. Method: Parents of all Swedish 9‐ and 12‐year‐old twins born between 1992 and 2000 were interviewed for DSM–IV ADHD symptoms and associated conditions. Two validated cutoff values were used for screening and assigning research diagnoses. Response rate was 80%. Twin methods were applied to investigate the extent to which ADHD is etiologically distinct from subthreshold variations in ADHD symptoms. Results: Extremes analyses indicated a strong genetic link between the extreme and the subthreshold variation, with almost identical group heritability estimates around .60 for the diagnostic (prevalence 1.78%) and screening (prevalence 9.75%) criteria of ADHD. Conclusion: A strong genetic link between the extreme and the subthreshold variation of DSM–IV based assessments of ADHD symptoms was found. The data suggest that ADHD is best viewed as the quantitative extreme of genetic and environmental factors operating dimensionally throughout the distribution of ADHD symptoms, indicating that the same etiologic factors are involved in the full range of symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02467.x

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Results from twin studies suggest that ADHD is the extreme and impairing tail of one or more heritable quantitative traits.

    “Although ADHD is a categorical diagnosis, results from twin studies suggest that it is the extreme and impairing tail of one or more heritable quantitative traits 27 .”

    From Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (2015) · cites this paper as [27]

  • Use of a nonclinical sample may limit the generalizability of these findings.

    “In addition, use of a nonclinical sample may limit generalizability of these findings, despite a consensus that ADHD is best conceptualized dimensionally (Barkley, 2006; Haslam et al., 2006; Larsson et al., 2012; Marcus & Barry, 2011).”

    From Reproductive steroids and ADHD symptoms across the menstrual cycle (2018) · cites this paper as Larsson et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Larsson, H., Anckarsater, H., Råstam, M., Chang, Z., & Lichtenstein, P.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09-16
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
73-80
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2108644876
Cited by
254
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 7
FWCI
10.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2010-03184)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, heritability, twin studies, genetic etiology, inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity, childhood ADHD
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Diseases in Twins, Female, Genetic Testing, Health Surveys, Humans, Genetic Linkage, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Severity of Illness Index, Sweden, Twins, Dizygotic, Twins, Monozygotic, Cohort Studies, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review