Cited by 190Child Development and Digital TechnologyAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Screen media use and ADHD-related behaviors: Four decades of research

Open access
Beyens, Ine, Valkenburg, Patti M., Piotrowski, Jessica Taylor·2018·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) among children and adolescents has increased considerably over the past decades. Scholars and health professionals alike have expressed concern about the role of screen media in the rise in ADHD diagnosis. However, the extent to which screen media use and ADHD are linked remains a point of debate. To understand the current state of the field and, ultimately, move the field forward, we provide a systematic review of the literature on the relationship between children and adolescents’ screen media use and ADHD-related behaviors (i.e., attention problems, hyperactivity, and impulsivity). Using the Differential Susceptibility to Media effects Model as a theoretical lens, we systematically organize the existing literature, identify potential shortcomings in this literature, and provide directions for future research. The available evidence suggests a statistically small relationship between media and ADHD-related behaviors. Evidence also suggests that individual child differences, such as gender and trait aggression, may moderate this relationship. There is a clear need for future research that investigates causality, underlying mechanisms, and differential susceptibility to the effects of screen media use on ADHD-related behaviors. It is only through a richer empirical body that we will be able to fully understand the media–ADHD relationship.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1611611114

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Personality characteristics are expected to be at least partly related to both social media use and mental health state.

    “Personality characteristics are expected to be at least partly related to both social media use and mental health state [28].”

    From Social Media and Mental Health Among Early Adolescents in Sweden: A Longitudinal Study With 2-Year Follow-Up (KUPOL Study). (2021) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Discussion and Avenues for Future Research section says dispositional factors influence the media children use and how they respond to it; the Dispositional Susceptibility section discusses links with ADHD-related behaviors. The paper addresses children's screen media and ADHD-related behaviors, not social media use and mental health state generally. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Across a four-decade span, there is a small but significant relationship between screen media use and ADHD behaviors.

    “The effects of screen time were also studied across a four-decade span and have found a small but significant relationship between screen media use and ADHD behaviors, further highlighting the importance of monitoring and managing screen time in this population to improve their attention span [63].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beyens, I., Valkenburg, P. M., & Piotrowski, J. T.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2018-10
Volume
115
Issue
40
Pages
9875-9881
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2895630669
Cited by
190
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
6.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • EC | European Research Council (AdG09 249488-ENTCHILD)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (024.001.003)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, screen media use, attention deficits, hyperactivity, impulsivity, children and adolescents, trait aggression, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Aggression, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Sex Factors, Multimedia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review