SOCIAL ORGANIZATION AND TERRITORIAL BEHAVIOUR IN THE
Abstract
The social organization of confined groups of wild house mice has been studied by direct observation and by indirect means. The prominent aggressive behaviour which leads to the formation of dominance‐subordination relationships under certain laboratory conditions is shown to result in territory formation when suitable environmental elements are provided. Fighting is almost entirely confined to adult males, but pregnant females may also defend territories. Although minor physical injury can result from fighting, survival rates are not significantly depressed if adequate cover is provided. Previous work on fighting in this species is reviewed from an ecological viewpoint and related to the results presented.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Female mice can become highly aggressive during pregnancy and lactation, not letting any intruder approach the nest.
“The only exception is pregnancy and lactation period, when females can become highly aggressive, not letting any intruder to approach the nest.79”
From Ecological validity of social interaction tests in rats and mice (2019) · cites this paper as [79]
When male offspring grows up, they start fighting with each other and the father until the strongest animal displaces all the other ones from the territory.
“When male offspring grows up, they start fighting with each other and the father until the strongest animal displaces all the other ones from the territory.76,79”
From Ecological validity of social interaction tests in rats and mice (2019) · cites this paper as [79]
Although initial fighting between female mice is possible, commonly a few of them can live peacefully on territory of one dominant male and sometimes even nest together.
“Although initial fighting between females is also possible, commonly a few of them can live peacefully on territory of one dominant male 73,79,80 and sometimes even nest together.81”
From Ecological validity of social interaction tests in rats and mice (2019) · cites this paper as [79]
Males introduced to a new habitat quickly start to defend it, vigorously attacking any other male in sight.
“Males introduced to a new habitat quickly start to defend it, vigorously attacking any other male in sight.73,78,79”
From Ecological validity of social interaction tests in rats and mice (2019) · cites this paper as [79]
Cites
Territoriality and Home Range Concepts as Applied to Mammals
Burt, W. H. (1943) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.2307/1374834 · Cited by 2,578 · see citing works
A HANDBOOK OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
&NA; (1935) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-193512000-00062 · Cited by 2,269 · see citing works
The Causes of Fighting in Mice and Rats
Scott, J. G., & Fredericson, E. (1951) · Physiological Zoology · doi:10.1086/physzool.24.4.30152137 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
Social Behavior, Reproduction, and Population Changes in the House Mouse (Mus musculus L.)
Brown, R. Z. (1953) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1943592 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
The social hierarchy in albino mice.
Uhrich, J. (1938) · Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0056350 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Feeding and breeding of laboratory animals. IX. A complete cubed diet for mice and rats
Bruce, H. M., & Parkes, A. S. (1949) · Journal of Hygiene · doi:10.1017/s0022172400014479 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Regulatory Mechanisms of House Mouse Populations: Social Behavior Affecting Litter Survival
Southwick, C. H. (1955) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1931300 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
The Population Dynamics of Confined House Mice Supplied with Unlimited Food
Southwick, C. H. (1955) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1933227 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Territoriality in Wild House Mice, Mus musculus L
Crowcroft, P. (1955) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.2307/1375908 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citationStrecker, R. L. (1954) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1931124 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
The Effects of Food Deprivation Upon Competitive and Spontaneous Combat in C57 Black Mice
Fredericson, E. (1950) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980.1950.9712776 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
THE GROWTH OP CONFINED COLONIES OF THE WILD HOUSE‐MOUSE (MUS MUSCULUS L.)
Crowcroft, P., & Rowe, F. P. (1957) · Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London · doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1957.tb00301.x · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationStrecker, R. L., & Emlen, J. T. (1953) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1930903 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Crowcroft, P., & Rowe, F. P. (1958) · Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London · doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1958.tb00693.x · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationWatching Nocturnal Animals by Infra-Red Radiation
Southern, H. N., Watson, J. S., & Chitty, D. (1946) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/1558 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Reproductive Ecology of the House Mouse
Bronson, F. H. (1979) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/411295 · Cited by 611 · see citing works
Social behaviour and density regulation in house mice living in large enclosures
Lidicker, W. Z. (1976) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/3575 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Ecological validity of social interaction tests in rats and mice
Kondrakiewicz, K., Kostecki, M., Szadzińska, W., & Knapska, E. (2019) · Genes, Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1111/gbb.12525 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
So, N., Franks, B., Lim, S., & Curley, J. P. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134509 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Whishaw, I. Q., Metz, G. A. S., Kolb, B., & Pellis, S. M. (2001) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.1041 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Cirulli, F., Berry, A., Bonsignore, L. T., Capone, F., D’Andrea, I., Aloe, L., Branchi, I., & Alleva, E. (2010) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.02.008 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Singleton, G. R., & Hay, D. A. (1983) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/bf00296932 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Hurst, J. L. (1990) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80917-0 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Urine marking and social dominance in male house mice (Mus musculus domesticus)
Drickamer, L. C. (2001) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/s0376-6357(00)00152-2 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Social dominance, aggressiveness and mating success among male house mice (Mus musculus)
Oakeshott, J. G. (1974) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00345742 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Fitzgerald, B. M., Karl, B. J., & Moller, H. (1981) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4070 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Maternal imprints and the origins of variation
Champagne, F. A. (2011) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.02.016 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Social structure and reproduction in two freelygrowing populations of house mice (Mus musculus L.)
Lloyd, J. A. (1975) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/0003-3472(75)90089-5 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Increased aggression in males in transgenic Tg2576 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease
Alexander, G., Hanna, A., Serna, V., Younkin, L., Younkin, S., & Janus, C. (2011) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.07.016 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Social organization and territorial behaviour in three strains of mice
Bisazza, A. (1981) · Bolletino di zoologia · doi:10.1080/11250008109439329 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Noyes, R. F., Barrett, G. W., & Taylor, D. H. (1982) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/bf00299679 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Coura, R. S., Cressant, A., Xia, J., de Chaumont, F., Olivo‐Marin, J. C., Pelloux, Y., Dalley, J. W., & Granon, S. (2013) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.13-231084 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Arakawa, H., & Higuchi, Y. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104597 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- CROWCROFT, P., & ROWE, F. P.
- Affiliations
- British Museum (GB)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1963-05
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 517-531
- ISSN
- 0370-2774 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095305426
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- house mouse, Mus musculus, social organization, territoriality, aggression, survival rate, cover
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review