Cited by 238Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Integrating mindfulness with parent training: effects of the Mindfulness-Enhanced Strengthening Families Program

Open access
Coatsworth, J. Douglas, Duncan, Larissa G., Nix, Robert L., Greenberg, Mark T., Gayles, Jochebed G., Bamberger, Katharine T., Berrena, Elaine, Demi, Mary Ann·2015·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

There is growing support for the efficacy of mindfulness training with parents as an intervention technique to improve parenting skills and reduce risk for youth problem behaviors. The evidence, however, has been limited to small scale studies, many with methodological shortcomings. This study sought to integrate mindfulness training with parents into the Strengthening Families Program: For Parents and Youth 10-14 (SFP 10-14), an empirically-validated family-based preventive intervention. It used a randomized-controlled comparative effectiveness study design (N = 432 families, 31% racial/ethnic minority) to test the efficacy of the Mindfulness-Enhanced Strengthening Families Program (MSFP), compared to standard SFP 10-14 and a minimal-treatment home study control condition. Results indicated that, in general, MSFP was as effective as SFP 10-14 in improving multiple dimensions of parenting, including interpersonal mindfulness in parenting, parent-youth relationship quality, youth behavior management, and parent well-being, according to both parent and youth reports at both postintervention and 1-year follow-up. This study also found that in some areas MSFP boosted and better sustained the effects of SFP 10-14, especially for fathers. Although the pattern of effects was not as uniform as hypothesized, this study provides intriguing evidence for the unique contribution of mindfulness activities to standard parent training.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0038212

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participants' inadequate understanding of mindfulness before intervention could have led them to score themselves higher, and after intervention they scored more accurately, contributing to lower post-intervention mindfulness scores.

    “Moreover, their inadequate understanding of mindfulness pre-intervention could have resulted in them scoring themselves higher. After undergoing the intervention, they would have acquired a better understanding of mindfulness and hence scored themselves more accurately (Coatsworth et al. 2015).”

    From The Effect of Mindfulness-Based and Acceptance Commitment Therapy-Based Interventions to Improve the Mental Well-Being Among Parents of Children with Developmental Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2022) · cites this paper as Coatsworth et al. 2015

    The Discussion reports that several mothers thought their post-intervention questionnaire scores would look worse because they viewed their parenting differently and noticed more missed opportunities for mindful parenting. The authors suggest the mothers may therefore have reported its challenges more accurately, but say their data cannot answer that question. The paper does not establish that participants initially had an inadequate understanding of mindfulness or that this caused lower post-intervention scores. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Benefits of parent participation in a mindfulness intervention spill over from parents to the parent-child relationship and youth outcomes.

    “the benefits of parent participation in a mindfulness intervention spill over from parents’ themselves as individuals to the parent-child relationship and, in turn, youth outcomes (Bogels et al. 2013; Chaplin et al. 2018; Coatsworth et al. 2015).”

    From Mindfulness Interventions to Reduce Impact of Interparental Conflict on Adolescents. (2020) · cites this paper as Coatsworth et al. 2015

    The Abstract and Results report improvements in parent well-being and aspects of parent–youth relationship quality after the mindfulness-enhanced program. But the Method > Measures section lists parenting and family-functioning outcomes, not youth outcomes; the Discussion describes reduced risk of youth problems as a possible implication rather than a demonstrated spillover. The paper also does not establish the claimed sequence from individual parent benefits through the relationship to youth outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Three studies included multiple respondents for child emotional and behavioural adjustment, parenting skills, and parent mindfulness outcomes.

    “Three studies included multiple respondents for child emotional and behavioural adjustment, parenting skills, and parent mindfulness outcomes, including mother, father and/or child reports (Coatsworth 2010; Coatsworth 2015; Gewirtz 2018).”

    From Mindfulness-enhanced parenting programmes for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children (0 to 18 years) and their parents (2024) · cites this paper as Coatsworth 2015

    The Method > Measures section (page unavailable) says mothers, fathers and youths reported on parental mindfulness, parent–youth relationships and youth behavior management, supporting the multiple-respondent and parenting-outcome parts of the claim. It does not list child emotional or behavioural adjustment as an outcome; the Results section (page unavailable) mentions child behavior problems only as a covariate. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For Coatsworth 2015, the risk of reporting bias was judged low because all expected outcomes were reported, though uncertainty exists due to the absence of a trial protocol.

    “Low risk All expected outcomes were reported.However, in the absence of a trial protocol, there is some uncertainty here.”

    From Mindfulness-enhanced parenting programmes for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children (0 to 18 years) and their parents (2024) · cites this paper as Coatsworth 2015

    The Present Study states the expected outcome domains, and the Method (Measures) and Results describe measures and report intervention outcomes. These passages support that the paper reported relevant outcomes, but they do not establish that all expected outcomes were reported or document the absence of a trial protocol. The low-risk judgment is the citing authors’ assessment, not a conclusion stated in this paper; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For Coatsworth 2015, the risk of detection bias was judged high because measures to blind outcome assessment were not reported and only self-report measures were used.

    “High risk The mesures adopted to blind outcome assessment from the knowledge of which intervention a participant received were not reported in the study.The study uses only self-report measures, and so the risk of bias as been assessed as high.”

    From Mindfulness-enhanced parenting programmes for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children (0 to 18 years) and their parents (2024) · cites this paper as Coatsworth 2015

    The Method (Measures) and Results sections describe questionnaire-based outcomes and do not report measures to blind outcome assessment. However, the outcomes include youths’ reports about their parents as well as parents’ self-reports, so the claim that only self-report measures were used is imprecise. The high-risk rating is the citing authors’ assessment, not a rating stated in the source paper. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cohen J Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1977 Academic Press New York
  2. Duncan LG Coatsworth JD Gayles J Geier M Greenberg MT Using Mother-Youth Behavioral Observations to Discriminate High Versus Low Self-Reported Mindful Parenting. Journal of Family Psychology in press PMC4586022 25844494

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coatsworth, J. D., Duncan, L. G., Nix, R. L., Greenberg, M. T., Gayles, J. G., Bamberger, K. T., Berrena, E., & Demi, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2015
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
26-35
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W1976348101
Cited by
238
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
16.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (RO1DA026217, T32 DA017629, F31DA03849)
  • Pennsylvania State University Children Youth and Families Consortium
  • National Institutes of Health (K01AT005270)
  • The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
mindfulness training, parent training, Strengthening Families Program, parenting skills, parent-youth relationships, parental well-being, family-based prevention, fathers, comparative effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Emotions, Family, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Personal Satisfaction, Program Evaluation, Parenting, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review