Cited by 205Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesPhysical Activity and Health

Aerobic exercise and resting blood pressure: a meta-analytic review of randomized, controlled trials

Open access
Kelley, George A., Kelley, Kristi A., Vu Tran, Zung·2001·Preventive Cardiology

Abstract

In this study the authors used the meta‐analytic approach to examine the effects of aerobic exercise on resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure in adults. Forty‐seven clinical trials representing a total of 72 effect sizes in 2543 subjects (1653 exercise, 890 control) met the criteria for inclusion. Statistically significant exercise‐minus‐control decreases were found for changes in resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure in both hypertensive (systolic, −6 mm Hg, 95% CI, −8 to −3; diastolic, −5 mm Hg, 95% CI, −7 to −3) and normotensive (systolic, −2 mm Hg, 95% CI, −3 to −1; diastolic, −1 mm Hg, 95% CI, −2 to −1) groups. The differences between groups were statistically significant (systolic, p=0.008; diastolic, p=0.000). Relative decreases were approximately 4% (systolic) and 5% (diastolic) in hypertensives, and 2% (systolic) and 1% (diastolic) in normotensives. It was concluded that aerobic exercise reduces resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure in adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1520-037x.2001.00529.x

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both aerobic and resistance training can lower blood pressure in nondiabetic individuals, with slightly greater effects observed with aerobic training.

    “Both aerobic and resistance training can lower BP in nondiabetic individuals, with slightly greater effects observed with the former ( 49 , 134 , 135 , 137 ).”

    From Exercise and Type 2 Diabetes (2010) · cites this paper as [134]

    The Abstract and Discussion report that aerobic exercise lowers resting blood pressure in adults, including hypertensive and normotensive groups (page numbers unavailable in our copy). The paper examines aerobic exercise only; it does not establish a benefit from resistance training, compare the two forms of training, or specify a nondiabetic population. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Begg CB. Publication bias. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, eds. The Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York, NY: Rus- sell Sage; 1994:399-409.
  2. Blumenthal JA, Siegal WC, Appelbaum M. Failure of exer- cise to reduce blood pressure in patients with mild hyper- tension. JAMA. 1991;266:2098-2104.
  3. Carroll JF. Effect of 6 Months of Exercise Training on Car- diovascular and Hormonal Responses to Head Up Tilt in Elderly Men and Women [dissertation]. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida; 1992.
  4. Emery CF. The Effect of Physical Exercise on Cognitive and Psychological Functioning in Community Aged [dissertation]. Los Angeles CA: University of Southern California; 1985.
  5. Tenorio LM. Effects of Aerobic Exercise on Symptoms of Depression in Women [dissertation]. Denton, TX: Texas Women's University; 1986.
  6. Walker SE. A Comparative Analysis of Aerobic Exercise, Re- stricted Environmental Stimulation (Flotation), and Stress Management Training on Physiological and Psychological Measures of Stress [dissertation]. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado; 1984.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelley, G. A., Kelley, K. A., & Vu Tran, Z.
Affiliations
MGH Institute of Health Professions (US)
Venue
Preventive Cardiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-04
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
73-80
ISSN
  • 1520-037X (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7141
OpenAlex
W1999182996
Cited by
205
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Preventive Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL056893)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
aerobic exercise, resting blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, hypertension, normotensive subjects, blood pressure reduction, exercise therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review