Cited by 305Endometriosis Research and TreatmentOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentCancer Risks and Factors

Risk of developing ovarian cancer among women with ovarian endometrioma: A cohort study in Shizuoka, Japan

Open access
Kobayashi, H., Sumimoto, K., Moniwa, N., Imai, M., Takakura, K., Kuromaki, T., Morioka, E., Arisawa, K. +1 more·2007·International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Abstract

Although some studies have indicated that endometriosis may increase the risk of developing ovarian cancer, there are no data from epidemiologic studies in Japan. We prospectively analyzed all cases of ovarian endometrioma enrolled in the prefecture-wide Shizuoka Cohort Study on Endometriosis and Ovarian Cancer Programme, which was initiated in 1985. To evaluate the risk of ovarian cancer by time periods subsequent to ovarian endometrioma diagnosis, a cohort of 6,398 women with a clinically documented ovarian endometrioma in Shizuoka between 1985 and 1995 was identified from the Shizuoka Cancer Registry (SCR), with follow-up through 2002. Ovarian cancer incidence among cohort members was ascertained by linkage to the SCR using a unique person-identification number. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed by a use of prefecture-wide rates of ovarian cancer, adjusted for age and calendar year. During follow-up of up to 17 years of the ovarian endometrioma cohort, 46 incident ovarian cancers were identified, yielding that the ovarian cancer risk was elevated significantly among patients with ovarian endometrioma (SIR = 8.95, 95% CI = 4.12-15.3). The SIR did not increase with increasing follow-up duration. The risk increased with increasing age at ovarian endometrioma diagnosis, with a SIR equal to 13.2 (95% CI = 6.90-20.9) in women above 50 years of age. Our findings for the first time support the hypothesis that ovarian endometrioma increases the subsequent risk of developing ovarian cancer in Shizuoka, Japan.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00754.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kobayashi, H., Sumimoto, K., Moniwa, N., Imai, M., Takakura, K., Kuromaki, T., Morioka, E., Arisawa, K., & Terao, T.
Affiliations
  • Nara Medical University (JP)
  • Hamamatsu University (JP)
  • Shizuoka Cancer Center (JP)
Corresponding author
Kobayashi, H.
Venue
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
37-43
ISSN
1048-891X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099581897
Cited by
305
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
FWCI
5.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecological Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
endometrioma, ovarian cancer risk, endometriosis, ovarian cancer incidence, age at diagnosis, standardized incidence ratio
MeSH terms
Adult, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Japan, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Registries, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review