Cited by 78Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Expanding the utility of the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES) and initial psychometric support for the Brief-BAES (B-BAES)

Open access
Rueger, Sandra Y., McNamara, Patrick J., King, Andrea C.·2009·Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The utility of one of the most widely used subjective alcohol assessment tools, the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES) has been somewhat limited based on lack of psychometric studies in large and diverse samples, a range of alcohol doses, the length of the measure, and the original instructional set which precluded baseline measurement and disclosed to subjects that they received alcohol. METHODS: The current study investigated the factor structure of the BAES with a modified instructional set at pre-drink baseline and after consumption of various doses of alcohol, in a sample of 190 men and women, heavy and light social drinkers. This study tested the psychometric properties of a brief version of the BAES (Brief-BAES or B-BAES). RESULTS: Results demonstrated robust support of the stimulant and sedative constructs across all conditions, and demonstrated strong psychometric support for the 6-item B-BAES. DISCUSSION: This is the first comprehensive study to expand the utility of the BAES by instructional set, baseline measurement, at various alcohol doses, and by drinking history and sex. In addition, the introduction of the B-BAES may further increase the utility of this scale, particularly in paradigms with repeated measurement or time constraints.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.00914.x

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nunnally JC 1978 Psychometric theory 2 nd McGraw-Hill Book Co New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rueger, S. Y., McNamara, P. J., & King, A. C.
Affiliations
Northern Illinois University (US)
Corresponding author
King, Andrea C.
Venue
Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04-13
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
916-924
ISSN
  • 0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0277
OpenAlex
W2085486502
Cited by
78
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA013746)
  • National Cancer Institute (P30‐CA14599, P30CA014599)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
alcohol dose-response, factor structure, psychometric properties, social drinkers, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholic Beverages, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Psychometrics, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review