Cited by 1,569Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessAuditing, Earnings Management, Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Greenwash: Corporate Environmental Disclosure under Threat of Audit

Lyon, Thomas P., Maxwell, John W.·2011·Journal of Economics & Management Strategy

Abstract

We develop an economic model of “greenwash,” in which a firm strategically discloses environmental information and an activist may audit and penalize the firm for disclosing positive but not negative aspects of its environmental profile. We fully characterize the model's equilibria, and derive a variety of predictions about disclosure behavior. We rationalize conflicting results in the empirical literature, finding a nonmonotonic relationship between a firm's expected environmental performance and its environmental disclosures. Greater activist pressure deters greenwash, but induces some firms to disclose less about their environmental performance. Environmental management systems discourage firms with poor expected environmental performance from greenwashing, which may justify public policies encouraging firms to adopt them.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00282.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Coglianese, 2001, Regulating from the Inside: Can Environmental Management Systems Achieve Policy Goals
  2. Delmas, 2000, Barriers and Incentives to the Adoption of ISO 14001 by Firms in the United States, Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum, 11, 1
  3. Greer, 1996, Greenwash: The Reality Behind Corporate Environmentalism
  4. Grossman, 2001, Special Interest Politics
  5. Johnson, 2003, Don't Be Fooled: The Ten Worst Greenwashers of 2003
  6. Kim , E.H. T.P. Lyon Strategic Environmental Disclosure: Evidence from the DOE's Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Registry,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (forthcoming).
  7. Milgrom, 1992, Economics, Organization and Management

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,569

Metadata

Authors
Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Venue
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02-24
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
3-41
ISSN
1058-6407 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3125595071
Cited by
1,569
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 280 · 2025: 224 · 2024: 189 · 2023: 168 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 106 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 41
FWCI
125.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Economics & Management Strategy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Keywords
greenwashing, corporate environmental disclosure, activist investors, corporate auditing, disclosure incentives, environmental performance, environmental management systems, strategic disclosure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review