Cited by 510Frailty in Older AdultsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNutrition and Health in Aging

Physical frailty is associated with incident mild cognitive impairment in community-based older persons

Open access
Boyle, Patricia A., Buchman, Aron S., Wilson, Robert S., Leurgans, Sue E., Bennett, David A.·2010·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that physical frailty is associated with risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: Approximately 40 retirement communities across the Chicago metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS: More than 750 older persons without cognitive impairment at baseline. MEASUREMENTS: Physical frailty, based on four components (grip strength, timed walk, body composition, and fatigue), was assessed at baseline, and cognitive function was assessed annually. Proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, and education were used to examine the association between physical frailty and the risk of incident MCI, and mixed effect models were used to examine the association between frailty and the rate of change in cognition. RESULTS: During up to 12 years of annual follow‐up, 305 of 761 (40%) persons developed MCI. In a proportional hazards model adjusted for age, sex, and education, physical frailty was associated with a high risk of incident MCI, such that each one‐unit increase in physical frailty was associated with a 63% increase in the risk of MCI (hazard ratio=1.63; 95% confidence interval=1.27–2.08). This association persisted in analyses that required MCI to persist for at least 1 year and after controlling for depressive symptoms, disability, vascular risk factors, and vascular diseases. Furthermore, a higher level of physical frailty was associated with a faster rate of decline in global cognition and five cognitive systems (episodic memory, semantic memory, working memory, perceptual speed, and visuospatial abilities). CONCLUSION: Physical frailty is associated with risk of MCI and a rapid rate of cognitive decline in aging.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02671.x

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A 12-year prospective cohort of 750 cognitively intact older adults found frailty associated with higher risk of incident mild cognitive impairment (HR 1.63, CI 1.27-2.08).

    “A prospective cohort study (n=750) of older people without cognitive impairment at baseline reported that frailty was associated with an increased risk of developing mild cognitive impairment over 12 years of follow-up (hazard ratio, HR, 1.63, CI, 1.27-2.08) (30).”

    From Frailty in elderly people (2013) · cites this paper as [30]

  • Greater frailty severity is linked to more rapid cognitive decline.

    “Increasing degree of frailty was also associated with a faster rate of cognitive decline.”

    From Frailty in elderly people (2013) · cites this paper as [30]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boyle, P. A., Buchman, A. S., Wilson, R. S., Leurgans, S. E., & Bennett, D. A.
Affiliations
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01-27
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
248-255
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1606270551
Cited by
510
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 22
FWCI
10.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG017917, R01‐AG17917, K23AG023040, R01AG024480, R01AG034374)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
physical frailty, mild cognitive impairment, cognitive decline, older adults, grip strength, timed walk, body composition, fatigue, episodic memory, semantic memory, working memory, perceptual speed, visuospatial ability, retirement communities
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chicago, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Prospective Studies, Risk, Comorbidity, Proportional Hazards Models, Frail Elderly

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review