Cited by 355Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPhysical Activity and HealthCognitive Functions and Memory

The effect of exercise training on cognitive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Gates, Nicola, Fiatarone Singh, Maria A., Sachdev, Perminder S., Valenzuela, Michael·2013·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives Investigations of exercise and cognition have primarily focused on healthy or demented older adults, and results have been equivocal in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Our aim was to evaluate efficacy of exercise on cognition in older adults with MCI.Design We conducted a meta-analysis of random controlled trials (RCTs) of exercise effects on cognitive outcomes in adults with MCI. Searches were conducted in Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, SPORTSDICUS, PsychInfo, and PubMed.Participants Adults aged over 65 years with MCI or Mini-Mental State Exam mean score 24-28 inclusive.Measurements Study quality was assessed using the PEDro scale; data on participant and intervention characteristics and outcomes were extracted, followed by meta-analysis.Results Fourteen RCTs (1,695 participants; age 65-95 years) met inclusion criteria. Quality was modest and under-powering for small effects prevalent. Overall, 42% of effect sizes (ESs) were potentially clinically relevant (ES >0.20) with only 8% of cognitive outcomes statistically significant. Meta-analysis revealed negligible but significant effects of exercise on verbal fluency (ES: 0.17 [0.04, 0.30]). No significant benefit was found for additional executive measures, memory, or information processing. Overall results were inconsistent with benefits varying across exercise types and cognitive domains.Conclusions There is very limited evidence that exercise improves cognitive function in individuals with MCI, although published research is of moderate quality and inconclusive due to low statistical power. Questions remain regarding the magnitude, generalization, persistence, and mechanisms of benefits. Large-scale, high-quality RCTs are required to determine if exercise improves cognition or reduces dementia incidence in those with MCI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.02.018

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gates, N., Fiatarone Singh, M. A., Sachdev, P. S., & Valenzuela, M.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
21
Issue
11
Pages
1086-1097
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976680102
Cited by
355
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 7
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
exercise training, mild cognitive impairment, cognitive function, older adults, verbal fluency, executive function, memory, dementia prevention, physical activity
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review