The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice?
Abstract
The concept of justice is discussed, and the thesis is advanced that “equity” is only one of the many values which may underlie a given system of justice. Hypotheses about the conditions which determine which values will be employed as the basis of distributive justice in a group are proposed, with discussion centered about the values of “equity,” “equality,” and “need” and the conditions which lead a group to emphasize one rather than another value.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New directions in equity research.
Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0033967 · Cited by 1,649
Cited by
Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 · Cited by 5,942
FOUNDATION FOR A GENERAL STRAIN THEORY OF CRIME AND DELINQUENCY*
AGNEW, R. (1992) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x · Cited by 5,046
The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations.
Fiske, A. P. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.4.689 · Cited by 2,510
A Model of Customer Satisfaction with Service Encounters Involving Failure and Recovery
Smith, A. K., Bolton, R. N., & Wagner, J. (1999) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3152082 · Cited by 2,058
Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206306294258 · Cited by 1,837
Moral Exclusion and Injustice: An Introduction
Opotow, S. (1990) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00268.x · Cited by 1,313
The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice Perspective
Gilliland, S. W. (1993) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258595 · Cited by 1,185
Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.337 · Cited by 1,127
Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments
van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(02)80003-x · Cited by 913
Race, race-based discrimination, and health outcomes among African Americans
Mays, V. M., Cochran, S. D., & Barnes, N. W. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190212 · Cited by 889
Rai, T. S., & Fiske, A. P. (2011) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0021867 · Cited by 887
Goodwin, C., & Ross, I. (1992) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/0148-2963(92)90014-3 · Cited by 777
Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes
Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006 · Cited by 682
Patterson, P. G., Cowley, E., & Prasongsukarn, K. (2006) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.02.004 · Cited by 525
Linking justice, trust and innovative work behaviour to work engagement
A. Agarwal, U. (2014) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-02-2012-0019 · Cited by 389
Thau, S., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020540 · Cited by 367
Barnea, M. F., & Schwartz, S. H. (1998) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/0162-895x.00090 · Cited by 353
VOICE, CONTROL, AND BELONGING: The Double-Edged Sword of Procedural Fairness
MacCoun, R. J. (2005) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115958 · Cited by 343
“Across various settings, studies have found support for allocation by equality, by need, or by more complex multidimensional decision rules (see Deutsch, 1975; Mellers and Baron 1993).”
BackgroundFairness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making: A systematic review of the empirical literature
Starke, C., Baleis, J., Keller, B., & Marcinkowski, F. (2022) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517221115189 · Cited by 316
Scientists' Perceptions of Organizational Justice and Self-Reported Misbehaviors
Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., Crain, A. L., & De Vries, R. (2006) · Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics · doi:10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.51 · Cited by 180
Marcinkowski, F., Kieslich, K., Starke, C., & Lünich, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372867 · Cited by 159
Education and distributive justice: Some reflections on grading systems.
Deutsch, M. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.5.391 · Cited by 108
Self-citationSchlicker, N., Langer, M., Ötting, S. K., Baum, K., König, C. J., & Wallach, D. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106837 · Cited by 106
On the Role of Fairness and Social Distance in Designing Effective Social Referral Systems1
Hong, Y., Pavlou, P. A., Shi, N., & Wang, K. (2017) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2017/41.3.06 · Cited by 91
How Do We Assess the Trustworthiness of AI? Introducing the Trustworthiness Assessment Model (TrAM)
Schlicker, N., Baum, K., Uhde, A., Sterz, S., Hirsch, M. C., & Langer, M. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qhwvx · Cited by 79
Yurrita, M., Draws, T., Balayn, A., Murray-Rust, D., Tintarev, N., & Bozzon, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581161 · Cited by 108
“, distributive fairness perceptions) [1, 28], the nature of the process that leads to those decisions (i.”
BackgroundFairness and Decision-making in Collaborative Shift Scheduling Systems
Uhde, A., Schlicker, N., Wallach, D. P., & Hassenzahl, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376656 · Cited by 64
Culture's Impact on the Importance of Fairness in Interorganizational Relationships
Lund, D. J., Scheer, L. K., & Kozlenkova, I. V. (2013) · Journal of International Marketing · doi:10.1509/jim.13.0020 · Cited by 61
Sörensen, S., & Pinquart, M. (2000) · Journal of Aging and Health · doi:10.1177/089826430001200301 · Cited by 53
Environmentally significant behavior in the home
Stern, P. C. (2008) · The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490118.015 · Cited by 50
Autin, F., Batruch, A., & Butera, F. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00707 · Cited by 45
Teachers’ Conceptions of Fairness in Classroom Assessment: An Empirical Study
Rasooli, A., Rasegh, A., Zandi, H., & Firoozi, T. (2023) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/00224871221130742 · Cited by 30
van den Broek, E., Sergeeva, A., & Huysman, M. (2026) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13276 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Deutsch, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-07
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 137-149
- ISSN
- 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4560
- OpenAlex
- W2034025364
- Cited by
- 2,745
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 75.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
