The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Psychometric Toolbox for Testing Validity and Reliability
Abstract
Purpose To review the concepts of reliability and validity, provide examples of how the concepts have been used in nursing research, provide guidance for improving the psychometric soundness of instruments, and report suggestions from editors of nursing journals for incorporating psychometric data into manuscripts. Methods CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO databases were searched using key words: validity, reliability, and psychometrics. Nursing research articles were eligible for inclusion if they were published in the last 5 years, quantitative methods were used, and statistical evidence of psychometric properties were reported. Reports of strong psychometric properties of instruments were identified as well as those with little supporting evidence of psychometric soundness. Findings Reports frequently indicated content validity but sometimes the studies had fewer than five experts for review. Criterion validity was rarely reported and errors in the measurement of the criterion were identified. Construct validity remains underreported. Most reports indicated internal consistency reliability (alpha) but few reports included reliability testing for stability. When retest reliability was asserted, time intervals and correlations were frequently not included. Conclusions Planning for psychometric testing through design and reducing nonrandom error in measurement will add to the reliability and validity of instruments and increase the strength of study findings. Underreporting of va…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Questions were derived from the two previous studies on the topic (Wilson et al. 2010(Wilson et al. , 2013)), thus contributing to both content and face validity (DeVon et al. 2007).”
From Understanding skill acquisition among registered nurses: the ‘perpetual novice’ phenomenon (2015) · cites this paper as DeVon et al. 2007
Citations
Cites
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.20147 · Cited by 7,510 · cited 2×
“The published literature, including texts and research articles, include extensive definitions of validity and reliability, though many pertain to comprehensive exploration of a single psychometric concept (Polit & Beck, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodA QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY1
LAWSHE, C. H. (1975) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x · Cited by 7,313
Reliability and Validity Assessment
Carmines, E., & Zeller, R. (1979) · doi:10.4135/9781412985642 · Cited by 5,884
Advanced Design in Nursing Research
Brink, P., & Wood, M. (1998) · doi:10.4135/9781452204840 · Cited by 433
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1097/00006199-200609000-00007 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572 · DOI · Paper page
- DiCenso A., 2005, Evidence‐based nursing, 432
- DeVellis R.F., 2003, Scale development: Theory and application
- 10.1097/00008483-200303000-00010 · DOI
- 10.1002/nur.4770130612 · DOI
- 10.1097/00006199-200507000-00009 · DOI
- 10.1080/074811801750058609 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1025809921592 · DOI
- Hulley S.B., 2001, Designing clinical research: An epidemiologic approach
- 10.1177/0193945905284726 · DOI
- 10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1081/CNV-120005902 · DOI
- Munro B.H., 2005, Statistical methods for health care research
- 10.4135/9781412985772 · DOI
- 10.1097/00024665-200211000-00013 · DOI
- Nunnally J.C., 1994, Psychometric theory
- 10.1097/00008483-200311000-00008 · DOI
- 10.1891/jnum.2005.13.2.147 · DOI
- Polit D.F., 2004, Nursing research: Principles and methods
- 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00061.x · DOI
- Schultz K.S., 2005, Measurement theory in action
- 10.1097/00006199-200511000-00008 · DOI
- Trochim W.M.K., 2001, The research methods knowledge base
- Waltz C.F., 2005, Measurement in nursing and health research
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,000
Mwansisya, T. E., Mbekenga, C. K., Isangula, K. G., Mwasha, L., Pallangyo, E., Edwards, G., Orwa, J., Mantel, M., Mugerwa, M., Subi, L., et al. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06686-9 · Cited by 18
“It is important for a tool to have reliability to be acceptable, but it also needs to be valid [35, 36].”
BackgroundSmith, E. M. L., Kuisell, C., Kanzawa-Lee, G. A., Bridges, C. M., Cho, Y., Swets, J. E., Renbarger, J., & Gilchrist, L. (2020) · Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1177/1043454220980253 · Cited by 13
“Strong internal consistency reliability was indicated by an alpha coefficient ≥ .70 and item–item and item–total score correlations ranging from .30 to.70 (DeVon et al., 2007).”
MethodAng, S. G. M., O’Brien, A. P., & Wilson, A. (2020) · International Journal of Older People Nursing · doi:10.1111/opn.12338 · Cited by 14
Wang, X., Tang, L., Howell, D., Shao, J., Qiu, R., Zhang, Q., & Ye, Z. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01642 · Cited by 17
“45 or higher, tools can be labeled as criterion valid (DeVon et al., 2007).”
BackgroundWeathers, E., Coffey, A., McSherry, W., & McCarthy, G. M. (2020) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151331 · Cited by 12
Development and Psychometric Testing of a Tool Measuring Nurses' Competence for Disaster Response.
Marin, S. M., Hutton, A., & Witt, R. R. (2020) · Journal of Emergency Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.jen.2020.04.007 · Cited by 13
Confirmation of a measurement model for manufacturing flexibility development practices
Mishra, R. (2020) · International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management · doi:10.1108/ijqrm-01-2019-0027 · Cited by 14
Douglas, S. L., Pignatello, G. A., Park, S., & Lipson, A. R. (2020) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-020-02458-w · Cited by 14
Psychometric properties of the psychosocial screening instrument for physical trauma patients (PSIT)
Karabatzakis, M., Oudsten, B. L. D., Gosens, T., & Vries, J. D. (2019) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-019-1234-6 · Cited by 14
Hughes, L., Farina, N., Page, T. E., Tabet, N., & Banerjee, S. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028045 · Cited by 21
“40 were considered acceptable.(36) Convergent validity is the extent to which a construct correlates with measures of the same or similar constructs.”
Graduating student nurses' and student podiatrists' wound care competence: a cross-sectional study.
Kielo, E., Salminen, L., Suhonen, R., Puukka, P., & Stolt, M. (2019) · Journal of Wound Care · doi:10.12968/jowc.2019.28.3.136 · Cited by 13
Evitapp: Persuasive Application for Physical Activity and Smoking Cessation
Bascur, A., Rossel, P. O., Herskovic, V., & Martínez-Carrasco, C. (2018) · International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence (UCAmI) · doi:10.3390/proceedings2191208 · Cited by 11
“The value for our questionnaire was 0.81 (good) [43].”
InfluentialMeasuring the perception of quality physical education in Latin American professionals
Ho, W. K. Y., Ahmed, M. D., de D’Amico, R. L., Ramos, A., Ferreira, E. L., Ferreira, M. B. R., Amaral, S. C. F., Gurrola, O. C., Díaz, G. B., Ramos, A., et al. (2018) · Revista Brasileira de Ciências do Esporte · doi:10.1016/j.rbce.2018.05.006 · Cited by 24
Ang, B. H., Chen, W. S., Ngin, C. K., Oxley, J. A., & Lee, S. W. H. (2017) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2017.11.003 · Cited by 15
“Test-retest, alternative forms, split-halves, inter-rater reliability and internal consistency were the common reliability tests adopted in behavioural research.(24) Since there was only one time administration, therefore, the internal consistency reliability test was chosen.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSahib, M. N. (2018) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s155152 · Cited by 13
“Thereafter, repeated discussions between the translators, expert panel, and the researcher were held to resolve any inconsistencies, and the final version was decided as the face validity process.(32) Finally, a pilot study was conducted by distributing the questionnaire to 30 participants from the same demographic ar…”
MethodDying Care Nursing Intervention in the Institutional Care of End-of-Life Patients
Kisvetrová, H., Joanovič, E., Vévoda, J., & Školoudík, D. (2017) · International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications · doi:10.1111/2047-3095.12128 · Cited by 13
“A value of greater than .70 was considered acceptable (DeVon et al., 2007).”
Itani, L., Chatıla, H., Dimassi, H. I., & Sahn, F. E. (2017) · Journal of Health Population and Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s41043-017-0086-0 · Cited by 21
“A scale content validity index (S-CVI) was calculated for each scale by averaging the CVR for all the retained items in the scale [35, 36].”
Tutticci, N. F., Coyer, F. M., Lewis, P., & Ryan, M. E. (2017) · Reflective Practice · doi:10.1080/14623943.2016.1268115 · Cited by 16
“Convergent and discriminant validity were the definitive measures of construct validity for the final model (DeVon et al., 2007).”
BackgroundStudents’ Perceptions and Faculty Measured Competencies in Higher Education
Malechwanzi, J. M., Lei, H., & Wang, L. (2016) · International Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.5430/ijhe.v5n3p56 · Cited by 14
Đức, D. M., Bergström, A., Eriksson, L., Selling, K. E., Ha, B. T. T., & Wallin, L. (2016) · Global Health Action · doi:10.3402/gha.v9.31572 · Cited by 15
“Test retest survey The test retest approach is primarily relevant for instruments assessing constructs that are not expected to change much between two administrations (21).”
Murray, N., Hatfield, M., Falkmer, M., & Falkmer, T. (2016) · Research in Autism · doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2015.12.007 · Cited by 18
Reid, C., Courtney, M., Anderson, D., & Hurst, C. (2015) · International Journal of Nursing Practice · doi:10.1111/ijn.12225 · Cited by 13
A multiple motive/multi-dimensional approach to measure smokeless tobacco dependence
Mushtaq, N., Beebe, L. A., Vesely, S. K., & Neas, B. R. (2013) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.11.016 · Cited by 16
Abdulameer, S. A., Sulaiman, S. A. S., Hassali, M. A., Sahib, M. N., & Subramaniam, K. (2013) · International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1111/1756-185x.12104 · Cited by 13
Sullivan, P., Harris, M., & Bell, D. (2013) · Clinical medicine (London) · doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.13-6-553 · Cited by 13
Ghasisin, L., Ahmadi, T., Mostajeran, F., Moazam, M., Derakhshande, F., قسیسین, ل., احمدی, ط., مستأجران, ف., معظم, م., & درخشنده, ف. (2013) · doi:10.22122/jrrs.v9i2.811 · Cited by 13
Chung, V. C., Wong, V. C. W., Lau, C., Hui, H., Lam, T. H., Lin, Z., Wong, S. Y. S., & Griffiths, S. M. (2010) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-8-111 · Cited by 17
Measures of social connectedness in adult populations: a systematic review
Plackett, R., Hulin, J., Mukuria, C., Clowes, M., Ramsay, S. E., Spencer, L. P., Adams, E. A., Dykxhoorn, J. L., Walters, K. R., Osborn, D., et al. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-20779-0 · Cited by 18
“Understanding these aspects of a measure helps to inform researchers and practitioners of the most appropriate measure to use for research and clinical practice [14, 15].”
Pelánek, R., Effenberger, T., & Jarušek, P. (2024) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-024-09396-z · Cited by 19
“A fully automated evaluation of the quality of statuses can be performed by psychometric techniques for assessing validity of measurements (DeVon et al. 2007).”
Development and validation of the nurses sexual harassment scale in Iran
Zeighami, M., Malakoutikhah, A., Shahrbabaki, P. M., Al-Oliamat, K., & Dehghan, M. (2024) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-024-01759-6 · Cited by 12
“Using the Lawshe table, a minimum content validity ratio was calculated [27, 28].”
MethodAnwar, Z., Hanurawan, F., Chusniyah, T., & Setiyowati, N. (2023) · Психологическая наука и образование · doi:10.17759/pse.2023280406 · Cited by 12
Belita, E., Fisher, K., Yost, J., Squires, J. E., Ganann, R., & Dobbins, M. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0272699 · Cited by 12
“This is the most frequently used statistic for examining reliability in psychometric testing, can be determined with one administration, and is recommended for use with items that have more than two response options [41, 64].”
MethodRomli, R., Mohamad, E., Rahman, R. A., Chew, K., Hashim, S. M., & Nawi, A. M. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19116858 · Cited by 12
Gizaw, Z., Worku, A., Bitew, B. D., Lee, J., & Bisesi, M. S. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-10811-x · Cited by 14
Farrell, R. M., Gilbert, G. E., Betance, L., Huck, J., Hunt, J., Dundas, J. M., & Pope, E. R. (2022) · Veterinary Surgery · doi:10.1111/vsu.13791 · Cited by 16
“Lawshe's method using CVR and CVI is an international standard for establishing content validity, providing concrete measurements to identify rubric items for acceptance or rejection, and allowing for generalizability of findings as it requires at least 10 reviewers of varying backgrounds to participate in the content…”
MethodBrief Report: Creation of a Transition Readiness Scale for Adolescents with ASD
Elias, R., Conner, C. M., & White, S. (2022) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-022-05449-7 · Cited by 12
“45 are considered supportive of concurrent validity (Devon et al., 2007).”
BackgroundGarcía, S. D. O., Salhi, L., Sefi, A., & Hanley, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.748145 · Cited by 14
“Validity is defined as the instrument’s ability to measure the properties of the construct under study (DeVon et al., 2007).”
BackgroundValidation of the Patient-Centred Care Competency Scale Instrument for Finnish Nurses
Suhonen, R., Katja, L., Stolt, M., Pasanen, M., & Lemetti, T. (2021) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm11060583 · Cited by 14
“However, the recommended sample size for a study like this, is at least five respondents per item in cross-sectional survey studies [38,39] which was realized in both studies.”
BackgroundTrost, C., Hofer, C., Stamm, T., Windhager, R., & Hobusch, G. (2021) · Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift · doi:10.1007/s00508-021-01865-4 · Cited by 12
Yazdi‐Feyzabadi, V., Nakhaee, N., Mehrolhassani, M. H., Naghavi, S., & Rad, E. H. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06147-3 · Cited by 15
“In this regard, to develop a valid and reliable instrument covering most relevant the perceived reasons for medical orders non-adherence can help the policy makers understand and identify the reasons and consequently adopt tailored policies to improve adherence [25, 26].”
BackgroundKnowledge assessment of anti-snake venom among healthcare practitioners in northern Nigeria
Bala, A. A., Jatau, A. I., Yunusa, I. U., Mohammed, M., Mohammed, A.-K. H., Isa, A., Wada, A. S., Gulma, K. A., Bello, I., Malami, S. A., et al. (2021) · Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease · doi:10.1177/20499361211039379 · Cited by 12
Influencing Factors of Plastic Waste Pollution Reduction in Kinshasa
Bukasa, O. T., Iskakova, D., Ganiyu, S. A., Rong, X., Li, M., & Li, J. (2020) · Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection · doi:10.4236/gep.2020.812011 · Cited by 12
“Cronbach’s alpha is the most widely used reliability statistic employed by many researchers to measure internal consistency reliability (Spiliotopoulou, 2009; Devon et al., 2007).”
MethodKoskimäki, M., Mikkonen, K., Kääriäinen, M., Lähteenmäki, M., Kaunonen, M., Salminen, L., & Koivula, M. (2020) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104657 · Cited by 14
Benah, S., & Li, Y. (2020) · Open Journal of Business and Management · doi:10.4236/ojbm.2020.86150 · Cited by 9
“Though Composite reliability is a less bias estimate of internal consistency, Cronbach’s alpha is the most preferred (Devon et al., 2007).”
BackgroundSalehpoor, A., Latifi, Z., & Tohidast, S. A. (2020) · International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology · doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110076 · Cited by 13
Jimam, N. S., Ismail, N. E., & Dayom, W. D. (2020) · Value in Health Regional Issues · doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2019.08.478 · Cited by 12
Vastamäki, M., Ruopsa, N., Vastamäki, H., Laimi, K., Ristolainen, L., & Saltychev, M. (2019) · Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.034 · Cited by 14
Rajiah, K., & Venaktaraman, R. (2019) · Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_19_15 · Cited by 16
“[14] Content validity pertained to the degree to which the questionnaire fully assessed or measured the construct of interest.[15] The valid content questionnaire is typically achieved by a rational analysis of the questionnaire by the raters (experts) familiar with the construct of interest.”
BackgroundTranslation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire
Yılmaz, O. (2019) · Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.5606/tftrd.2019.2693 · Cited by 13
“The internal consistency evaluates whether the questions in a scale are correlated amongst themselves.[24,25] In general, having a Cronbach alpha coefficient of 0.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe care of older people with dementia in rural Australian hospitals – a case study
Shannon, K., Cruickshank, M., & Grealish, L. A. (2018) · Australian journal of advanced nursing · doi:10.37464/2018.361.1446 · Cited by 15
Hasan, A. (2018) · Vision The Journal of Business Perspective · doi:10.1177/0972262918803489 · Cited by 12
“Thus I-CVI (i.e., efficacy of individual items) is 14/25 = 0.56; 11/25 = 0.44; and 10/25 = 0.40, respectively, which does not meet the required level that is 0.83, so this item is dropped (Devon et al., 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialImpact of Head and Neck Cancer Treatment on Survivors' Mealtime Experience
Chan, K. M., Chan, H., Siu, J. Y. L., Pu, D., Nund, R., & Ward, E. (2018) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.27501 · Cited by 12
“As discussed above, items 17 to 19 were some of the most commonly affected items, and therefore would be kept in the HNSAM.”
MethodInfluentialAfolabi, M., Rennie, S., Hallfors, D., Kline, T. L., Zeitz, S., Odongo, F., Amek, N., & Luseno, W. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021613 · Cited by 12
“This same expert panel also assessed content validity to establish whether the content of the questionnaire was appropriate and relevant to the context for which it was developed.(27) The tool was revised based on the feedback from these experts.”
MethodElvén, M., Hochwälder, J., Dean, E., Hällman, O., & Söderlund, A. (2018) · AIMS Public Health · doi:10.3934/publichealth.2018.3.235 · Cited by 15
“Suggested next steps may be validation with contrasted groups [46] and investigations using the R4C instrument in intervention studies and in various contexts.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAspects influencing the commitment of endurance athletes: a tourism perspective
Myburgh, E., Kruger, M., & Saayman, M. (2018) · Journal of Sport Tourism · doi:10.1080/14775085.2018.1472032 · Cited by 12
“the questions in the questionnaire in this case, relate to the relevant theoretical construct (DeVon et al., 2007; Kane, 2001) and the degree to which the intended independent variable (construct) relates to the independent proxy variable (indicator) (Parsian & Dunning, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAbdulameer, S. (2018) · International Journal of COPD · doi:10.2147/copd.s157403 · Cited by 12
“Validation and reliability Face validity Face validity is the capacity of an item to measure the construct that it proposes to measure.(27) Five experts in the pharmacy field were invited in order to test the degree of difficulty, clarity, appropriateness, and comprehensiveness of the questionnaire items and to provid…”
BackgroundSunar, İ., Tasdelen, O. Y., Garip, Y., & Bodur, H. (2014) · International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1111/1756-185x.12371 · Cited by 29
In-Home Medication Management Performance Evaluation (HOME–Rx): A Validity Study
Murphy, M. C., Somerville, E. K., Keglovits, M., Hu, Y., & Stark, S. L. (2017) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.2017.022756 · Cited by 14
Psychometric Properties of the Lifetime Assessment of Violent Acts
King, A., Russell, T. D., & Bailly, M. D. (2017) · Violence and Victims · doi:10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-16-00067 · Cited by 12
“Acceptable evidence of reliability and concurrent validity was set at alphas ..80 (Nunnally, 1967), test– retest coefficients ..70 (Cronbach, 1970; DeVon et al., 2007), and kappa coefficients ..50 (Viera & Garrett, 2005).”
BackgroundMertoğlu, O., Üçer, O., Ceylan, Y., Bozkurt, O., Gunlusoy, B., Albaz, A. C., & Demir, Ö. (2016) · International Neurourology Journal · doi:10.5213/inj.1630460.230 · Cited by 12
An Ethical Issue Scale for Community Pharmacy Setting (EISP): Development and Validation
Crnjanski, T., Krajnović, D., Tadić, I., Stojkov, S., & Savić, M. (2015) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9587-z · Cited by 13
Olakanmi, E. E. (2016) · Journal of Baltic Science Education · doi:10.33225/jbse/16.15.68 · Cited by 12
Kluwe‐Schiavon, B., Tractenberg, S. G., Sanvicente‐Vieira, B., Rosa, C. S. D. O., Arteche, A. X., Pezzi, J. C., & Grassi‐Oliveira, R. (2015) · Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria · doi:10.1590/0047-2085000000066 · Cited by 10
Validation of the partner version of the multidimensional vaginal penetration disorder questionnaire
Molaeinezhad, M., Khoei, E. M., Salehi, M., Yousfy, A., & Roudsari, R. L. (2014) · Journal of Education and Health Promotion · doi:10.4103/2277-9531.145913 · Cited by 10
“Construct validity Data reduction and EFA A PCA conducted to determine the degree to which the items in the instrument relate to the relevant theoretical construct.[28] The Kaiser‐Meyer‐Olkin measure of sampling adequacy (0.”
MethodDevelopment process and psychometric testing of foot health assessment instrument
Stolt, M., Suhonen, R., Puukka, P. J., Viitanen, M. H., Voutilainen, P., & Leino‐Kilpi, H. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.12078 · Cited by 11
Confiabilidad y validez de la escala para homofobia en estudiantes de medicina*
Campo‐Arias, A., Villamil, M. M. L., & Gaitán‐Duarte, H. (2012) · Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría · doi:10.1016/s0034-7450(14)60052-4 · Cited by 14
Siadatnezhad, S., Ziaei, T., & Khoori, E. (2018) · doi:10.5742/mewfm.2018.93197 · Cited by 12
“We didn’t assess reliability using test–retest, since grief involves a dynamic concept with its intensity decreasing over time; according to some researchers, it has no stability feature (2, 40).”
MethodSabo, A., Kuan, G., Sarimah, A., Kuay, H. S., & Kueh, Y. C. (2024) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-024-01782-x · Cited by 9
Xu, H., Liang, C.-G., Kong, J., Chen, Q., Zhao, Y., & Zhang, F. (2024) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-024-01939-4 · Cited by 11
“A correlation coefficient of 0.7 or higher was set as the cut-off point [43].”
BackgroundInfluentialFactor Analysis of Croatian Secondary School Teachers’ Readiness for Digital Transformation
Kirinić, V., Čerepinko, D., & Žigo, I. R. (2023) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci12120650 · Cited by 12
Portuguese Version of the Oral Frailty Index-8: Instrument Validation Study
Corrêa, L., de Júdice, A. F. T., Scoz, R. D., Machado, V., Mendes, J. J., Proença, L., Botelho, J., & Ferreira, L. M. A. (2024) · Interactive Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.2196/49975 · Cited by 11
van Doorne, I., Mokkenstorm, K., Willems, D. L., Buurman, B. M., & van Rijn, M. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14772 · Cited by 10
Jiang, C., Mastrotheodoros, S., Zhu, Y., Yang, Y., Hallit, S. R., Zhao, B. T., Fan, Y., Huang, M., Chen, C., Ma, H., et al. (2023) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s385510 · Cited by 14
“500) with the PSS-C-10, given the fact that both instruments are supposed to measure related constructs (perceived stress).(52) Hypothesis 2: Moderate positive correlation (≥ 0.”
Competence of clinical nurse educators in university hospitals: A cross-sectional study
Kaarlela, V., Mikkonen, K., Pohjamies, N., Ruuskanen, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kuivila, H., & Haapa, T. (2021) · Nordic Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/20571585211066018 · Cited by 11
“70 is often regarded as the minimum acceptable value.(22) However, the coefficients may have been influenced the small sample size used in this work and the application of the instrument to a new target group of nurse educators.”
MethodResultNguyen, T. V., Nguyen, K., Nguyen, P., Nguyen, N. M., Lý, C. L., Nguyen, T., Nguyen, M., Le, H., Nguyễn, X. T. K., Dương, N. H. P., et al. (2021) · Geriatrics · doi:10.3390/geriatrics6040116 · Cited by 11
“The length between the two interviews ranged from 2 weeks to a month [25].”
BackgroundKorhonen, J., Axelin, A., Katajisto, J., & Lahti, M. (2021) · Nursing Open · doi:10.1002/nop2.1132 · Cited by 13
“Methodologically, construct validity indicates the instrument's degree and capability of measuring the formulated constructs in relation to its theoretical background and concepts (DeVon et al., 2007; Polit & Beck, 2018).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialDesigning and Validation of the Nurses’ Preparedness to Response to COVID-19 Questionnaire in Iran
Sharififar, S., Farahani, R. H., Khoshvaghti, A., & Marzaleh, M. A. (2021) · Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness · doi:10.1017/dmp.2021.233 · Cited by 11
Vierula, J., Talman, K., Hupli, M., Laakkonen, E., Engblom, J., & Haavisto, E. (2021) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14799 · Cited by 9
Knowledge intermediation strategies: a dynamic capability perspective
Traoré, N., Amara, N., & Rhaiem, K. (2021) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtaa036 · Cited by 11
Abdullah, B., Kandiah, R., Hassan, N. F. H. N., Ismail, A. F., Mohammad, Z., & Wang, D.-Y. (2020) · The World Allergy Organization Journal · doi:10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100482 · Cited by 11
Mao, X., Wang, Z., Hu, X., & Loke, A. Y. (2020) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101678 · Cited by 13
Hidrus, A., Kueh, Y. C., Norsa’adah, B., & Kuan, G. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17030922 · Cited by 12
“4 was treated as a problematic item [28,29] and subjected for removal after adequate theoretical support was carried out.”
BackgroundRafieyan-Kopaei, Z., Dastgerdi, Z. F., Tarrahi, M. J., & Zamani‐Alavijeh, F. (2019) · The Italian Journal of Pediatrics/Italian journal of pediatrics · doi:10.1186/s13052-019-0749-0 · Cited by 10
“79 [39], and content validity ratio (CVR) with scores higher than 0.”
BackgroundRuttledge, A., & Cathcart, J. M. (2019) · Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1108/ijot-01-2019-0001 · Cited by 13
Haryani, H., Hsu, Y.-Y. A., Warsini, S., & Wang, S. (2018) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.08.016 · Cited by 14
Barthauer, L., Spurk, D., & Kauffeld, S. (2018) · Psychology · doi:10.4236/psych.2018.98122 · Cited by 11
“Results revealed an average loading of each two items measuring psychosocial and career support higher than .70, suggesting convergent validity (De Von et al., 2007).”
BackgroundJorvand, R., Tavousi, M., & Ghofranipour, F. F. (2018) · Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal · doi:10.5812/ircmj.62027 · Cited by 10
López-Lapeyrere, C., Serna-Gómez, N., López, A. B. H., Pérez-García, M. F., Tejeda-Esteban, A., & Muñoz, M. S. (2017) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2017.11.008 · Cited by 14
Validity and reliability of the Evidence Utilisation in Policymaking Measurement Tool (EUPMT)
Imani-Nasab, M., Yazdizadeh, B., Salehi, M., Seyedin, H., & Majdzadeh, R. (2017) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-017-0232-6 · Cited by 11
Alqurashi, H., Alfarea, M. M., Al-Qurai, T., Al-Kadi, M., AlBassam, B. N., & Nazir, M. A. (2016) · The Saudi Journal for Dental Research · doi:10.1016/j.sjdr.2016.04.002 · Cited by 14
Psychometric Validation of the Family Nurse Caring Belief Scale in a Neonatal Nursing Population
Magri, E. P. (2016) · Journal of pediatric nursing · doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2018.09.002 · Cited by 11
“identifies whether or not a particular variable consistently measures the true underlying construct that it says it measures (DeVon et al., 2007).”
BackgroundThe Hope and Adaptation Scale (HAS): Establishing Face and Content Validity
Soundy, A., Rosenbaum, S., Elder, T. J., Kyte, D. G., Stubbs, B., Hemmings, L., Roskell, C., Collett, J., & Dawes, H. (2016) · Open Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation · doi:10.4236/ojtr.2016.42007 · Cited by 9
“The face and construct validity was established through three stages [28] [29].”
BackgroundPsychometric properties of the RCMAS-2 in pediatric cancer patients
Wu, L., Liu, Y., Chen, H., Tseng, H., & Lin, W. (2015) · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2015.07.008 · Cited by 12
Development and clinical gains of nurse-led medication monitoring profiles
Gabe, M., & Jordan, S. E. (2013) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/jonm.12067 · Cited by 15
Chen, S.-T., Soo, K., Rahman, A. A., Rostenberghe, H. V., & Harith, S. (2013) · doi:10.3923/pjn.2013.708.714 · Cited by 11
“7 and above shows good homogeneity among the items (DeVon et al., 2007; Sushil and Verma, 2010).”
BackgroundUnderstanding the common inter-rater reliability measures
Lim, S., Palethorpe, N., & Rodger, S. (2012) · International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation · doi:10.12968/ijtr.2012.19.9.488 · Cited by 11
Can a Single-Item Measure Assess Physical Load at Work? An Analysis From the GAZEL Cohort
Sabbath, E., Goldberg, M., Wu, Q., & Descatha, A. (2012) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1097/jom.0b013e31824af5a8 · Cited by 11
“Ideally the test-retest period is two weeks to one month because a longer time between testing occasions is generally associated with lower reliability (20); however, PPS was only collected annually.”
BackgroundMethods to assess the validity of the interRAI Acute Care: a framework to guide clinimetric testing
Wellens, N. I. H., Milisen, K., Flamaing, J., & Moons, P. (2010) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01571.x · Cited by 13
Scale for developmental dyslexia screening: evidence of validity and reliability.
Bassôa, A., Costa, A. C., Toazza, R., & Buchweitz, A. (2021) · International Symposium on Cooperative Database Systems for Advanced Applications · doi:10.1590/2317-1782/20202020042 · Cited by 11
“Urbina(11) notes simply that the correlation must be strong, while DeVon et al.(30), in their review, indicate that values higher than 0.”
BackgroundInfluentialIskandar, M. L., & Ariffin, A. (2019) · Management Science Letters · doi:10.5267/j.msl.2019.4.022 · Cited by 11
“A panel of content experts is then asked to review the potential scale items and validate that they are appropriate indicators of the construct (Devon et al., 2007).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- DeVon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle‐Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D. J., Savoy, S. M., & Kostas‐Polston, E.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University Northwest (US)
- Corresponding author
- DeVon, Holli A.
- Block, Michelle E.
- Moyle‐Wright, Patricia
- Ernst, Diane M.
- Hayden, Susan J.
- Lazzara, Deborah J.
- Savoy, Suzanne M.
- ORCID
- DeVon, Holli A.
- Venue
- Journal of Nursing Scholarship
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-05-23
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-164
- ISSN
- 0363-2792 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-6546
- 1547-5069
- OpenAlex
- W2162602057
- Cited by
- 1,889
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 87 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 186 · 2023: 176 · 2022: 148 · 2021: 163 · 2020: 145 · 2019: 144 · 2018: 131 · 2017: 113 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 15.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Nursing Scholarship (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ePublications at Regis University (Regis University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Keywords
- psychometric properties, reliability statistics, validity, content validity, criterion validity, construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, nursing equipment, nursing research
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Mathematics, Periodicals as Topic, Planning Techniques, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychometrics, Research Design, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Nursing Research, Bias, Discriminant Analysis, Guidelines as Topic, Peer Review, Research, Statistics, Nonparametric, Editorial Policies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review