The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Psychometric Toolbox for Testing Validity and Reliability
Abstract
Purpose To review the concepts of reliability and validity, provide examples of how the concepts have been used in nursing research, provide guidance for improving the psychometric soundness of instruments, and report suggestions from editors of nursing journals for incorporating psychometric data into manuscripts. Methods CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO databases were searched using key words: validity, reliability, and psychometrics. Nursing research articles were eligible for inclusion if they were published in the last 5 years, quantitative methods were used, and statistical evidence of psychometric properties were reported. Reports of strong psychometric properties of instruments were identified as well as those with little supporting evidence of psychometric soundness. Findings Reports frequently indicated content validity but sometimes the studies had fewer than five experts for review. Criterion validity was rarely reported and errors in the measurement of the criterion were identified. Construct validity remains underreported. Most reports indicated internal consistency reliability (alpha) but few reports included reliability testing for stability. When retest reliability was asserted, time intervals and correlations were frequently not included. Conclusions Planning for psychometric testing through design and reducing nonrandom error in measurement will add to the reliability and validity of instruments and increase the strength of study findings. Underreporting of va…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Questions were derived from the two previous studies on the topic (Wilson et al. 2010(Wilson et al. , 2013)), thus contributing to both content and face validity (DeVon et al. 2007).”
From Understanding skill acquisition among registered nurses: the ‘perpetual novice’ phenomenon (2015) · cites this paper as DeVon et al. 2007
Citations
Cites
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.20147 · Cited by 7,510 · cited 2×
“The published literature, including texts and research articles, include extensive definitions of validity and reliability, though many pertain to comprehensive exploration of a single psychometric concept (Polit & Beck, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodA QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY1
LAWSHE, C. H. (1975) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x · Cited by 7,313
Reliability and Validity Assessment
Carmines, E., & Zeller, R. (1979) · doi:10.4135/9781412985642 · Cited by 5,884
Advanced Design in Nursing Research
Brink, P., & Wood, M. (1998) · doi:10.4135/9781452204840 · Cited by 433
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1097/00006199-200609000-00007 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572 · DOI · Paper page
- DiCenso A., 2005, Evidence‐based nursing, 432
- DeVellis R.F., 2003, Scale development: Theory and application
- 10.1097/00008483-200303000-00010 · DOI
- 10.1002/nur.4770130612 · DOI
- 10.1097/00006199-200507000-00009 · DOI
- 10.1080/074811801750058609 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1025809921592 · DOI
- Hulley S.B., 2001, Designing clinical research: An epidemiologic approach
- 10.1177/0193945905284726 · DOI
- 10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1081/CNV-120005902 · DOI
- Munro B.H., 2005, Statistical methods for health care research
- 10.4135/9781412985772 · DOI
- 10.1097/00024665-200211000-00013 · DOI
- Nunnally J.C., 1994, Psychometric theory
- 10.1097/00008483-200311000-00008 · DOI
- 10.1891/jnum.2005.13.2.147 · DOI
- Polit D.F., 2004, Nursing research: Principles and methods
- 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00061.x · DOI
- Schultz K.S., 2005, Measurement theory in action
- 10.1097/00006199-200511000-00008 · DOI
- Trochim W.M.K., 2001, The research methods knowledge base
- Waltz C.F., 2005, Measurement in nursing and health research
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,000
Halm, M. (2023) · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1111/wvn.12639 · Cited by 6
Guo, P., Zhang, X., Cui, N., Chen, D., Wang, L., Zheng, Q., Xu, J., Jin, Y., Mao, M., Xu, P., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1128971 · Cited by 8
Graham, C., Gina, A., Seeley, J., & Saman, Y. (2023) · International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology · doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111449 · Cited by 6
Mohd, R. H., Kadir, N. B. A., Ismail, W. N. K., Jalil, S. J. A., Abdullah, N.-A., Kasim, A. C., Hoesni, S. M., & Manaf, M. R. A. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19127542 · Cited by 11
“The convergent validity of each factor is estimated based on an average shared variance (AVE) > 0.5 [67].”
BackgroundInfluentialLiu, X., Chen, J., Zhang, K., Wang, X., Wang, G., & Zhang, R. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11114-4 · Cited by 6
“The evaluation items were distinguished in detail according to their importance and relevance, so the experts could rate the items using a five-point Likert scale (DeVon et al., 2007).”
MethodFoster, M., Presseau, J., Podolsky, E., McIntyre, L., Papoulias, M., & Brehaut, J. (2021) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-021-01145-9 · Cited by 6
Family Factors Affecting Adolescent Violence: A Qualitative Content Analysis
Ramezankhani, A., Vedadhir, A., Alhani, F., & Mohammadkhah, F. (2021) · doi:10.5812/ijhrba.96906 · Cited by 6
Iqbal, M., Khalid, M. S., Rehman, N., & Li, Y. (2021) · Journal of Divorce and Remarriage · doi:10.1080/10502556.2021.1925854 · Cited by 6
“The questionnaire was observed by researchers for content and face validity (DeVon et al., 2007).”
BackgroundKanninen, T., Häggman‐Laitila, A., Tervo‐Heikkinen, T., Hess, R. G., & Kvist, T. A. (2021) · Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences · doi:10.1111/scs.12983 · Cited by 9
“Cronbach's alpha coefficient is a frequently used statistic to assess internal consistency, and the most widely used by nurse researchers for this purpose (27).”
BackgroundMethodValidity and Reliability of Student Models for Problem-Solving Activities
Effenberger, T., & Pelánek, R. (2021) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3448139.3448140 · Cited by 5
“…may desire consistency of the measurements through time (test-retest reliability) [8], between raters (inter-rater reliability) [16], between multiple variants of the measurement tool (alternate forms reliability) [8], or between subsets of items in the measurement tool (internal consistency) [6].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKim, E. Y., Lee, Y., Jeong, E., & Chang, S. O. (2020) · Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing · doi:10.17079/jkgn.2020.22.4.316 · Cited by 6
“In this case, the stability of the scale was also verified by satisfying the criteria for a stable scale [27].”
MethodNetthong, R., Ahmadi, K., & Kane, R. (2020) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics9110798 · Cited by 6
“It basically measures the degree to which an item measures what it is meant to measure [38].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialChen, W.-Y., Kang, Z.-X., Fang, X.-P., & Li, J. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12208626 · Cited by 6
“The content validity and reliability were calculated by two widely used indexes, the Lawshe’s content validity ratio (CVR) [30] and Cronbach’s α [31], respectively.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGartner, R. E., Sterzing, P. R., Fisher, C., Woodford, M., Kinney, M. K., & Victor, B. (2020) · Psychology of women quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684320949746 · Cited by 6
Psychometric properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Mexican pregnant women
Luna, D., Castañeda-Hernández, D. V., Guadarrama-Arteaga, A. L., Figuerola-Escoto, R. P., Arista, A. G., Ixtla-Pérez, M. B., Jiménez-López, L. M., Alva-Alva, R., Meneses-González, F., & Fernández, M. Á. L. (2020) · Salud Mental · doi:10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2020.019 · Cited by 9
Peimani, M., Nasli-Esfahani, E., Stewart, A., Shakibazadeh, E., Yekaninejad, M., & Garmaroudi, G. (2020) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108109 · Cited by 6
Fauziyah, S., Radji, M., Andrajati, R., & Sartika, R. A. D. (2020) · Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_19_106 · Cited by 10
“45,[25] which means that they had a low alignment and consistency of items to the instrument.”
BackgroundDesigning an Accountability Index: A Case Study of South America Central Governments
Vasto, P. H. D., del Campo, C., Grande, E. U., & Jorge, S. (2019) · Central European Journal of Public Policy · doi:10.2478/cejpp-2019-0009 · Cited by 9
“78, which – according to DeVellis (2016) and DeVon et al. (2007) – denotes that a strong internal consistency exists within each itemcluster.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialUsman, R., Jamil, B., & Waheed, N. (2019) · JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association · doi:10.5455/jpma.286712 · Cited by 6
Vicdan Algısı Ölçeği’ nin Türkçe Geçerlilik Güvenilirliği
Aksoy, S., Mert, K., & Çetin, İ. (2019) · Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi · doi:10.34087/cbusbed.599744 · Cited by 6
Brooks, M., Nguyen, R. H., Bruno, R., & Peacock, A. (2019) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106101 · Cited by 7
Measuring the Burden on Family Caregivers of People With Cancer
Kristanti, M., Vernooij-Dassen, M., Utarini, A., Effendy, C., & Engels, Y. (2019) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/ncc.0000000000000733 · Cited by 6
Hadizadeh-Talasaz, F., Simbar, M., Esmaily, H., & Roudsari, R. L. (2019) · International Journal of Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.22074/ijfs.2019.5700 · Cited by 6
“05) and remained in the questionnaire (27-29).”
MethodJimam, N. S., Ismail, N., & Dapar, M. (2019) · Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.7324/japs.2019.90605 · Cited by 6
“On a general note, these results indicated excellent I-CVI (Devon et al., 2007; Lynn, 1986) with of the content of the draft PKAPIUM scale among the panel of experts, which was an indicator that the instrument might be a good one for assessing patients’ KAP on uncomplicated malaria (Bölenius et al…”
InfluentialThe Psychometric properties of dementia knowledge scales: A Systematic Review
Phan, T.-H. T. (2019) · GSTF JOURNAL of Nursing and Health Care · doi:10.5176/2345-7198_4.1.119 · Cited by 6
“ Data abstraction criteria used to evaluate behavioral assessment scales (see Table 2) were based on DeVon (2007)[10], Zwakhalen (2006)[11], and Streiner & Norman (2003)[12] for health measurement scales.”
CULTURAL ADAPTATION AND RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF THE EARLY CLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF BALANCE
Gontijo, A. P. B., Starling, J. M. P., Oliveira, G. D., Meier, D., & Mancini, M. C. (2019) · Revista Paulista de Pediatria · doi:10.1590/1984-0462/;2019;37;3;00001 · Cited by 9
Development and Psychometric Testing of the Registered Nurses’ Perceptions of Rewarding Scale
Seitovirta, J., Lehtimäki, A.-V., Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. M., Mitronen, L., & Kvist, T. A. (2018) · Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/jnr.0000000000000276 · Cited by 6
Loh, H. P., de Korne, D. D., Yin, S., Ang, E., & Lau, Y. (2019) · AORN Journal · doi:10.1002/aorn.12640 · Cited by 6
Graham, C., Seeley, J., Gina, A., & Saman, Y. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210764 · Cited by 7
Reliability starts with the experimental tools employed
Wall, M. B. (2018) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2018.11.034 · Cited by 6
Durepos, P., Orr, E., Ploeg, J., & Kaasalainen, S. (2018) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.13778 · Cited by 8
Vastamäki, M., Ristolainen, L., Vastamäki, H., Laimi, K., & Saltychev, M. (2018) · Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jse.2018.01.010 · Cited by 6
Basics Statistics Critical Thinking Test : Reliability and Validity Issues
Setambah, M. A., Tajudin, N. M., & Adnan, M. (2018) · Jurnal Didaktik Matematika · doi:10.24815/jdm.v5i1.9572 · Cited by 6
“This can be judged by the appointment of a specialist in the field (Lynn, 1986; Lawshe, 1975; DeVon et al., 2007). So that, the researcher is already appoint three evaluators to do so. According Oluwatayo (2012), there are some things that need to be considered by the experts.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialChavarria, J., Rueger, S. Y., & King, A. (2018) · Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.13634 · Cited by 6
“With regard to discriminant validity, associations between the HSS-5 and the interpersonal (b = 0.38, p 0.001), intrapersonal (b = 0.44, p 0.001), and impulse control (b = 0.33, p < 0.001) subfactors of the DrInC2Rwere less than the 0.45 threshold (DeVon et al., 2007).”
InfluentialRhee, Y., Park, J. H., Cha, H.-J., & Kim, K. H. (2017) · Perspectives In Psychiatric Care · doi:10.1111/ppc.12207 · Cited by 6
Sagong, H., Kim, D. E., Bae, S., Lee, G. E., Edvardsson, D., & Yoon, J. Y. (2018) · Research in Community and Public Health Nursing · doi:10.12799/jkachn.2018.29.1.11 · Cited by 8
“Therefore, convergent validity of KPCQ-S with job satisfaction was verified [27].”
BackgroundOh, S., Park, S. Y., Lee, H., & Lee, J. H. (2018) · Child Health Nursing Research · doi:10.4094/chnr.2018.24.1.78 · Cited by 7
Denton, J. M., Fike, D., Walk, M. E., & Jackson, C. (2017) · Journal of Physical Therapy Education · doi:10.1097/jte.0000000000000001 · Cited by 6
“70 were considered acceptable.(42) Test–retest reliability was marginal(42) in first-year DPTstudents with an ICC of .”
BackgroundPsychometric testing of inventory of beliefs and attitudes on domestic violence.
Hutchinson, M., & Doran, F. (2017) · Nurse Researcher · doi:10.7748/nr.2017.e1469 · Cited by 6
“Before establishing the validity and psychometric properties of the instrument, face validity was tested (DeVon et al 2007) with a small group of nursing students (n=10) and healthcare professionals with expertise in DV (n=10).”
MethodAura, S., Paakkonen, H., Metsävainio, K., Saano, S., Selander, T., Jordan, S., & Turunen, H. (2017) · doi:10.1016/j.jradnu.2016.11.002 · Cited by 6
Frandeș, M., Deiac, A. V., Timar, B., & Lungeanu, D. (2017) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s127922 · Cited by 7
“Face validity ensures the appropriateness and ease to complete the questions.(32) It was guaranteed by professionals’ and patients’ review during the pilot study.”
Chew, E., Griva, K., & Cheung, P. (2016) · International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1111/1756-185x.12932 · Cited by 6
Making Sense of Methods and Measurement: Sample Size Issues for Psychometric Studies
Gilbert, G., & Prion, S. (2016) · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2016.07.012 · Cited by 6
Clary-Muronda, V., & Pope, C. (2016) · Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.jogn.2016.04.007 · Cited by 6
Professional Development In Monitoring And Evaluation And Result Utilization In Meru Region In Kenya
Cavens, K., Kidombo, H., & Gakuu, C. (2016) · European Scientific Journal ESJ · doi:10.19044/esj.2016.v12n23p309 · Cited by 6
“Validity of instruments was ensured by formulating questions to test variables as conceptualized in the literature review and theories studied by a number of researchers in this field (Hogan, Greenfield &Schmidt, 2001; DeVon et al., 2007).”
MethodKirginas, S., & Gouscos, D. (2016) · International Journal of Serious Games · doi:10.17083/ijsg.v3i2.120 · Cited by 6
“Construct validity refers to the degree to which the items on an instrument relate to the relevant theoretical construct [46, 47].”
BackgroundConstruct and Concurrent Validity of the Democritos Movement Screening Tool for Preschoolers
Kambas, A., & Venetsanou, F. (2016) · Pediatric Physical Therapy · doi:10.1097/pep.0000000000000206 · Cited by 6
Revision and Psychometric Testing of the Safe Administration of Medications Scale
Bravo, K., Pozehl, B., & Kupzyk, K. (2016) · Journal of Nursing Measurement · doi:10.1891/1061-3749.24.1.147 · Cited by 6
“Reliability evidence met the suggested level of .70 for new scales (DeVon et al., 2007).”
BackgroundMuhamad, Z., Ramli, A., & Amat, S. (2015) · Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal · doi:10.18295/2075-0528.1690 · Cited by 6
Kosteniuk, J. G., Wilson, E., Penz, K., MacLeod, M. L. P., Stewart, N., Kulig, J., Karunanayake, C., & Kilpatrick, K. (2015) · Primary Health Care Research & Development · doi:10.1017/s1463423615000158 · Cited by 6
“Cronbach’s α coefficient can be computed on the basis of one test administration, as in the current cross-sectional pilot survey, and as such is generally used more than other statistical tests to demonstrate internal consistency reliability (DeVon et al. 2007; Tavakol and Dennick, 2011).”
MethodMedication Safety Climate Questionnaire: Development and Psychometric Analysis
Kumud, Kantilal, Vivian, Auyeung, Cate, Whittlesea, Alice, & Oborne (2015) · doi:10.17265/2328-7136/2015.01.001 · Cited by 6
“α coefficient, as it is the only reliability index that can be performed with one test administration [27].”
Background[Decision making satisfaction in health scale: instrument adapted and validated to Portuguese].
Martinho, M. J. C. M., Martins, M. M. F. P. D. S., & Angelo, M. (2014) · Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem · doi:10.1590/0034-7167.2014670605 · Cited by 6
Kim, J., Park, J. H., Foster, R. L., & Tavakoli, A. S. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04274.x · Cited by 6
Spirituality Measurement in African American Cancer Survivors
Mollica, M. A., & Nemeth, L. S. (2013) · Journal of Holistic Nursing · doi:10.1177/0898010113495713 · Cited by 6
Validating a Process-of-Care Checklist for Intensive Care Units
Conroy, K. M., Elliott, D., & Burrell, A. (2013) · Anaesthesia and Intensive Care · doi:10.1177/0310057x1304100311 · Cited by 6
“Readmission to ICU this hospital stay 2 (9) 9 (12)”
BackgroundDe-Juanas, Á., Pardo, R., Diestro, A., Ferro, A., & Sampedro, J. (2012) · doi:10.3989/redc.2012.4.900 · Cited by 6
Application of Bayesian Methodology to Measure Equivalence Between Two Rating Scales
Pawlowicz, F. E., Gajewski, B., Coffland, V., Boyle, D., Bott, M., & Dunton, N. (2012) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/nnr.0b013e318253341b · Cited by 6
“Traditional content validity requires experts to evaluate each item’s relevance to the construct using a 4-point Likerttype scale ranging from not relevant to very relevant (DeVon et al., 2007).”
BackgroundLate Life Function and Disability Instrument in African American Women: Function Component
Murrock, C. J., & Zauszniewski, J. A. (2011) · Women & Health · doi:10.1080/03630242.2011.589493 · Cited by 6
“Cronbach’s alpha is sample specific as it is a measure of internal consistency for test responses from current participants (DeVon et al., 2007).”
BackgroundAzila-Gbettor, E. M., Atatsi, E. A., Tulasi, E. E., & Ayimey, E. K. (2024) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100803 · Cited by 6
Junaid-ur-Rehman, S. (2022) · Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology · doi:10.17352/tcsit.000049 · Cited by 6
“Constructs validity was assessed by predictive validity, convergent validity, and construct validity [40,41].”
BackgroundAssessing engineering exercises: a novel taxonomy
Liotino, M., Garone, A., Knorn, S., Varagnolo, D., Garone, E., & Fedeli, M. (2022) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.223 · Cited by 6
Initial Psychometric Testing of the Knowledge About Atrial Fibrillation and Self-Management Survey
McCabe, P. J., Sendin, M. J., Stuart-Mullen, L. G., Kronebusch, B. J., Fowler, S. A., Krecke, C. A., & Kopecky, S. L. (2019) · The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1097/jcn.0000000000000613 · Cited by 6
“To evaluate known groups validity, we conducted an independent samples t test to determine whether the KAFSM survey score would be significantly different between participants recently diagnosed with AF and participants who were seen in an AF specialty clinic and had undergone an ablation procedure to maintain sinus r…”
MethodResultInfluentialHaryani, H., Afiyanti, Y., Besral, B., Gayatri, D., Wahidi, K. R., Pramiasti, H., & Milanti, A. (2019) · Archive of oncology · doi:10.2298/aoo190531011h · Cited by 5
Development of the Test and Examination Anxiety Measure (TEAM)
Brooks, B., Alshafei, D., & Taylor, L. (2015) · doi:10.24839/2164-8204.jn20.1.2 · Cited by 6
“The Cronbach’s alpha value for the TEAM of .90 shows that the scale can be used for clinical applications, the preferred alpha for clinical assessments being .90 or higher (Connelly, 2011; DeVon et al., 2007).”
MethodMasoi, T. J., Kibusi, S. M., Sirili, N. S., & Mselle, L. T. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0326362 · Cited by 4
Matsunaga, M., Suzuki, K., Matsui, M., Toyama, K., Ito, S., Okade, Y., Kasuga, K., Deng, P., Matsuo, T., Morioka, Y., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1505502 · Cited by 8
Heufel, M., Kourouche, S., Mitchell, R. J., Cardona, M., Thomas, B., Lo, W. A., Murgo, M., Vergan, D., & Curtis, K. A. (2025) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.70041 · Cited by 4
“Validity is ‘ the ability of an instrument to measure the attributes of the construct under study ’ [22].”
Sterkenburg, A., van Dongen, L. J. C., & Hafsteinsdøttir, T. B. (2025) · Journal of Professional Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2025.01.002 · Cited by 5
Pretorius, T. B., & Padmanabhanunni, A. (2024) · African Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.4102/ajopa.v6i0.165 · Cited by 4
“Item-total correlations should be greater than 0.50 (Paulsen & BrckaLorenz, 2017) and factor loadings greater than 0.55 (DeVon et al., 2007), which would indicate that, to a large extent, the items contribute to the measurement of the latent variable.”
InfluentialHellström, A., Pakpour, A. H., Odzakovic, E., Björk, M., Ulander, M., Knutsson, S. E. M., Sandlund, C., & Broström, A. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0311259 · Cited by 7
Taye, D., Semela, T., & Assefa, S. (2025) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.150357.4 · Cited by 1
Laborne, F., Machado, V., Botelho, J., & Lopes, L. B. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13164725 · Cited by 5
“The α coefficient of 0.70 was considered acceptable for the COHIP-19-EN items [21].”
MethodInfluentialDevelopment of mathematical mindset scale for mathematics education students
Megawanti, P., Supriyati, Y., & Tjalla, A. (2024) · International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) · doi:10.11591/ijere.v13i4.27845 · Cited by 5
“An expert validation test known as content validity is to ensure that the items in the instrument sample the complete range of the attributes under study [59].”
BackgroundLiu, K. S. N., Chen, J. Y., Sun, K. S., Tsang, J. P. Y., Ip, P., Wong, C. K. H., & Lam, C. L. K. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1355638 · Cited by 4
“Internal construct validity is commonly assessed by item-scale correlation (18, 19).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAhn, S., & Kim, D. E. (2024) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-024-01891-3 · Cited by 9
“Convergent validity indicates a correspondence between theoretically similar concepts [38].”
BackgroundPadmanabhanunni, A., & Pretorius, T. (2024) · Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud · doi:10.46634/riics.276 · Cited by 5
The domestic elder abuse in China: Scale development and psychometric properties
Yang, Y., Huang, J., Wang, M., Wang, F., Luo, H., Fan, B., Huang, Y., Xu, W., Zheng, C., & Zhang, M. (2024) · Geriatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2023.12.013 · Cited by 6
Turkish validity and reliability study of the nursing home adjustment scale
Akpınar, C. V., Belice, T., Bolukbasi, S., & Mandıracıoğlu, A. (2023) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-023-04314-1 · Cited by 5
“Correlation values ≥ 0.45 were considered acceptable for convergent validity with a similar construct [7, 19].”
BackgroundInfluentialDevelopment and validation of the Nursing Journal Club Perception Scale (NJCPS)
Hassan, N. P., Singh, K., Kunjavara, J., Mannethodi, K., Alomari, A. M. A., Joy, G. V., Singh, R., & Lenjawi, B. A. (2023) · Journal of Education and Health Promotion · doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1043_22 · Cited by 5
Measures Determining Dementia-Related Attitudes in Adolescents: A Scoping Review
Hassan, E., Hicks, B., Tabet, N., & Farina, N. (2023) · Journal of Intergenerational Relationships · doi:10.1080/15350770.2023.2229837 · Cited by 4
“Test–retest reliability was not commonly reported across the measures, although this type of stability testing is not necessarily deemed the most appropriate for constructs that are expected to change over time such as attitudes (De Von et al., 2007).”
Farooq, M. N., Naz, S., Kousar, A., & Shahzad, K. (2023) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-023-06586-5 · Cited by 4
Rahim, M. H. A., Ibrahim, M. I., Rahman, A. A., & Yaacob, N. M. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11091276 · Cited by 5
“By assessing the clarity and understanding of the inventory’s language, any different researcher and participant views of the items’ structure were removed [28].”
BackgroundEmpirical Evidence of Shared Intentionality: Towards Bioengineering Systems Development
Danilov, I. V., & Mihailova, S. (2023) · OBM Neurobiology · doi:10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2302167 · Cited by 5
Kostas-Polston, E., Terehoff, C. B., Nash, L. N., Brown, A. M., Delabastide, Z. A., Andersen, E. W., Brown, W. J., Stucky, C. H., Norcross, K. R., Smith, H., et al. (2023) · Military Medicine · doi:10.1093/milmed/usad042 · Cited by 5
Self-citationChen, J.-C., Fan, X., Fan, J., Lai, X., Li, G., & Li, F.-B. (2023) · Water · doi:10.3390/w15020341 · Cited by 5
Mahou, F. Z., Elamari, S., Sulaiman, A. A., Bouaddi, O., Changuiti, O., Mouhaoui, M., & Khattabi, A. (2023) · Advances in Simulation · doi:10.1186/s41077-022-00241-0 · Cited by 5
Overcoming Vocabulary-Related Anxieties in Students When Communicating in the Media Internationally
Борщовецька, В. Д., Molotkina, Y., Vitomska, N., Serhiienko, I., & Turitsyna, O. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Methodology · doi:10.12973/ijem.8.3.431 · Cited by 4
“This proved that the scale items conceptually correlated well with each other, according to DeVon et al. (2007).”
MethodResultFidalgo, J., Botelho, J., Proença, L., Mendes, J., Machado, V., & Delgado, A. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19169931 · Cited by 5
“70 was acceptable for the items in the PIDAQ-PT [19].”
MethodDevelopment and psychometric testing of the preceptors' orientation competence instrument (POCI).
Pohjamies, N., Mikkonen, K., Kääriäinen, M., & Haapa, T. (2022) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103445 · Cited by 5
Nazari, J., Ahmadpour-Geshlagi, R., Akbarinia, G. R., Gillani, N., Karimkhani, F., & Alizadeh, S. S. (2022) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-022-13363-x · Cited by 5
Takahashi, C., Sato, F., & Yoshida, S. (2022) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100077 · Cited by 5
Parenting practices during early childhood: validity evidence of a Brazilian scale
Rodrigues, O., Altafim, E., Pereira, V. A., Nogueira, S. C., & Schiavo, R. D. A. (2022) · Jornal de Pediatria · doi:10.1016/j.jped.2022.01.007 · Cited by 5
“Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis To examine the psychometric properties of the IEPMB scale, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted with a randomly selected sample, as recommended by the literature.(17,18) Thus, 425 mothers remained in the exploratory an…”
MethodIndarwati, F., Munday, J., & Keogh, S. J. (2022) · International Journal of Nursing Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.03.005 · Cited by 6
“Also, they were asked to evaluate if the questions are worded and in a format and scale that is feasible for use in the Indonesian context [30,42,43].”
BackgroundAn examination of the reliability and validity of the recovery capital questionnaire (RCQ)
Burns, J., & Yates, R. (2022) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109329 · Cited by 4
“It is not straightforward to compare internal consistency between the RCQ and the Assessment of Recovery Capital (ARC) because, despite convention, Groshkova et al. (2013) did not report it for that study.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAlelayan, H., Huang, H.-Y., Yang, Y., Chen, Y.-Y., & Liao, X.-Y. (2022) · Journal of pediatric nursing · doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2022.01.008 · Cited by 5
Khalid, M. S., Qi, Z.-Y., & Bibi, J. (2021) · doi:10.1108/ejtd-12-2020-0175 · Cited by 5
Development and validation of a scale to measure attitude of people toward men in nursing profession
Sharma, S. K., & Mudgal, S. K. (2021) · Journal of Education and Health Promotion · doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_530_20 · Cited by 7
Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Successful Aging Inventory
Tarmazdi, M. F., Tagharrobi, Z., Sooki, Z., & Sharifi, K. (2020) · Galen Medical Journal · doi:10.31661/gmj.v9i0.1754 · Cited by 5
“The quantitative content validity of the Persian version of SAI was assessed by calculating the relaxed content validity ratio (CVRrelaxed) and index (CVI).”
MethodInfluentialValidación de un instrumento para medir la adherencia al tratamiento en hipertensión y diabetes
Guevara, S. L. R., Parra, D. I., Roa‐Díaz, Z. M., & Rojas, L. Z. (2020) · Revista CUIDARTE · doi:10.15649/cuidarte.1062 · Cited by 3
Ramisetty‐Mikler, S., Nievar, M. A., & Jordan, T. (2019) · Journal of Social Service Research · doi:10.1080/01488376.2018.1537946 · Cited by 4
“Confirmation of the validity and reliability of tools assure the integrity of study findings (Devon et al., 2007), which is seldom a requirement of mandated parent intervention programs.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- DeVon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle‐Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D. J., Savoy, S. M., & Kostas‐Polston, E.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University Northwest (US)
- Corresponding author
- DeVon, Holli A.
- Block, Michelle E.
- Moyle‐Wright, Patricia
- Ernst, Diane M.
- Hayden, Susan J.
- Lazzara, Deborah J.
- Savoy, Suzanne M.
- ORCID
- DeVon, Holli A.
- Venue
- Journal of Nursing Scholarship
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-05-23
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-164
- ISSN
- 0363-2792 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-6546
- 1547-5069
- OpenAlex
- W2162602057
- Cited by
- 1,889
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 87 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 186 · 2023: 176 · 2022: 148 · 2021: 163 · 2020: 145 · 2019: 144 · 2018: 131 · 2017: 113 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 15.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Nursing Scholarship (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ePublications at Regis University (Regis University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Keywords
- psychometric properties, reliability statistics, validity, content validity, criterion validity, construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, nursing equipment, nursing research
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Mathematics, Periodicals as Topic, Planning Techniques, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychometrics, Research Design, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Nursing Research, Bias, Discriminant Analysis, Guidelines as Topic, Peer Review, Research, Statistics, Nonparametric, Editorial Policies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review