Cited by 158Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury Research

How understanding the neurobiology of complex post-traumatic stress disorder can inform clinical practice: a social cognitive and affective neuroscience approach: Neurobiology of PTSD and clinical practice

Lanius, R. A., Bluhm, R. L., Frewen, P. A.·2011·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this review, we examine the relevance of the social cognitive and affective neuroscience (SCAN) paradigm for an understanding of the psychology and neurobiology of complex post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and its effective treatment. METHOD: The relevant literature pertaining to SCAN and PTSD was reviewed. RESULTS: We suggest that SCAN offers a novel theoretical paradigm for understanding psychological trauma and its numerous clinical outcomes, most notably problems in emotional/self-awareness, emotion regulation, social emotional processing and self-referential processing. A core set of brain regions appear to mediate these collective psychological functions, most notably the cortical midline structures, the amygdala, the insula, posterior parietal cortex and temporal poles, suggesting that problems in one area (e.g. emotional awareness) may relate to difficulties in another (e.g. self-referential processing). We further propose, drawing on clinical research, that the experiences of individuals with PTSD related to chronic trauma often reflect impairments in multiple social cognitive and affective functions. CONCLUSION: It is important that the assessment and treatment of individuals with complex PTSD not only addresses traumatic memories but also takes a SCAN-informed approach that focuses on the underlying deficits in emotional/self-awareness, emotion regulation, social emotional processing and self-referential processing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01755.x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lanius, R. A., Bluhm, R. L., & Frewen, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Old Dominion University (US)
Corresponding author
Lanius, R. A.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08-19
Volume
124
Issue
5
Pages
331-348
ISSN
0001-690X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162116497
Cited by
158
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
complex PTSD, neurobiology of trauma, emotional self-awareness, emotion regulation, social-emotional processing, self-referential processing, amygdala, insula, posterior parietal cortex, temporal pole, cortical midline structures, chronic trauma, PTSD treatment
MeSH terms
Affective Symptoms, Brain, Emotions, Humans, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Social Behavior, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review