Cited by 36Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Neuroimaging the traumatized self: fMRI reveals altered response in cortical midline structures and occipital cortex during visual and verbal self- and other-referential processing in women with PTSD.

Open access
Frewen, Paul, Thornley, Elizabeth, Rabellino, Daniela, Lanius, Ruth·2017·European Journal of Psychotraumatology

Abstract

Background: Changes to the diagnostic criteria for PTSD in DSM-5 reflect an increased emphasis on negative cognition referring to self and other, including self-blame, and related pervasive negative affective states including for self-conscious emotions such as guilt and shame.Objective: Investigate the neural correlates of valenced self-referential processing (SRP) and other-referential processing (ORP) in persons with PTSD.Method: We compared response to the Visual-Verbal Self-Other Referential Processing Task in an fMRI study of women with (n = 20) versus without (n = 24) PTSD primarily relating to childhood and interpersonal trauma histories using statistical parametric mapping and group independent component analysis.Results: As compared to women without PTSD, women with PTSD endorsed negative words as more descriptive both of themselves and others, whereas positive words were endorsed as less descriptive both of themselves and others. Women with PTSD also reported a greater experience of negative affect and a lesser experience of positive affect during SRP specifically. Significant differences between groups were observed within independent components defined by ventral- and middle-medial prefrontal corte x, mediolateral parietal cortex, and visual cortex, depending on experimental conditions.Conclusions: This study reveals brain-based disturbances during SRP and ORP in women with PTSD related to interpersonal and developmental trauma. Psychological assessment and treatment should address altered sense of self and affective response to others in PTSD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/20008198.2017.1314164

Cites

87 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. First M. B., Spitzer R. L., Gibbon M., & Williams J. B. W. (2002). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders, patient edition (SCID-I/P, 11/2002 revision), for DSMIV. New York, NY: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute.
  2. Hatfield E., Cacioppo J. T., & Rapson R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion: Cambridge studies in emotion and social interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Herman J. L. (2011). PTSD as a shame disorder In Dearing R. L. & Tangney J. P. (Eds.), Shame in the therapy hour (pp. 261– 276). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frewen, P., Thornley, E., Rabellino, D., & Lanius, R.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Frewen, Paul
Venue
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Published
2017-01-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
1314164-1314164
ISSN
2000-8066 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2614273590
Cited by
36
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Psychotraumatology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ontario Mental Health Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, self-referential processing, self-conscious emotions, negative affect, self-blame, guilt, shame, women, childhood trauma, interpersonal trauma, medial prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, visual cortex, neural correlates, DSM-5 diagnostic criteria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review