Cited by 224Action Observation and SynchronizationFace Recognition and PerceptionChild and Animal Learning Development

Social cognitive neuroscience: where are we heading?

Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne, Winston, Joel, Frith, Uta·2004·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Humans crave the company of others and suffer profoundly if temporarily isolated from society. Much of the brain must have evolved to deal with social communication and we are increasingly learning more about the neurophysiological basis of social cognition. Here, we explore some of the reasons why social cognitive neuroscience is captivating the interest of many researchers. We focus on its future, and what we believe are priority areas for further research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2004.03.012

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on social cognition will continue to follow the strategy of segregating processes that contribute promiscuously to both social and nonsocial-cognitive abilities from those that appear exclusive to human social behavior.

    “It is expected that, for some time to come, research on social cognition will continue to follow this strategy of segregating processes that contribute promiscuously to both social and nonsocial-cognitive abilities from those that appear exclusive to human social behavior (Blakemore et al. 2004).”

    From Activity in Right Temporo-Parietal Junction is Not Selective for Theory-of-Mind (2008) · cites this paper as Blakemore et al. 2004

  • Mentalizing about similar versus dissimilar others is associated with a distinct division of labor in medial prefrontal cortex: a dorsal aspect for dissimilar others and a more ventral aspect (vMPFC) for similar others.

    “Specifically, a dorsal aspect of the medial prefrontal cortex has been associated with mentalizing about people perceived to be dissimilar from oneself, whereas a more ventral aspect of medial prefrontal cortex (vMPFC) has been linked to mentalizing about those perceived to be similar.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blakemore, S.-J., Winston, J., & Frith, U.
Affiliations
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
Corresponding author
Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
216-222
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145802841
Cited by
224
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
social cognitive neuroscience, social cognition, social communication, social isolation, future research directions
MeSH terms
Bayes Theorem, Communication, Emotions, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Neurophysiology, Social Behavior, Cognitive Science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review