Cited by 1,123Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Emotion Modulation in PTSD: Clinical and Neurobiological Evidence for a Dissociative Subtype

Open access
Lanius, Ruth A., Vermetten, Eric, Loewenstein, Richard J., Brand, Bethany, Schmahl, Christian, Bremner, J. Douglas, Spiegel, David·2010·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

In this article, the authors present evidence regarding a dissociative subtype of PTSD, with clinical and neurobiological features that can be distinguished from nondissociative PTSD. The dissociative subtype is characterized by overmodulation of affect, while the more common undermodulated type involves the predominance of reexperiencing and hyperarousal symptoms. This article focuses on the neural manifestations of the dissociative subtype in PTSD and compares it to those underlying the reexperiencing/hyperaroused subtype. A model that includes these two types of emotion dysregulation in PTSD is described. In this model, reexperiencing/hyperarousal reactivity is viewed as a form of emotion dysregulation that involves emotional undermodulation, mediated by failure of prefrontal inhibition of limbic regions. In contrast, the dissociative subtype of PTSD is described as a form of emotion dysregulation that involves emotional overmodulation mediated by midline prefrontal inhibition of the same limbic regions. Both types of modulation are involved in a dynamic interplay and lead to alternating symptom profiles in PTSD. These findings have important implications for treatment of PTSD, including the need to assess patients with PTSD for dissociative symptoms and to incorporate the treatment of dissociative symptoms into stage-oriented trauma treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09081168

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When the prefrontal cortex is shutdown among individuals with classic PTSD, it can propagate an emotion under-modulation symptom profile, including hypervigilance and hyperarousal symptoms.

    “Specifically, when the prefrontal cortex is shutdown among individuals with classic PTSD, it can propagate an emotion under-modulation symptom profile, which includes hypervigilance and hyperarousal symptoms.”

    From How Processing of Sensory Information From the Internal and External Worlds Shape the Perception and Engagement With the World in the Aftermath of Trauma: Implications for PTSD (2021) · cites this paper as Lanius et al., 2010

    The Neurobiological Studies section links reduced medial prefrontal activation and failed prefrontal inhibition to emotional undermodulation in the reexperiencing/hyperaroused PTSD subtype. It does not describe the prefrontal cortex as completely “shutdown.” The Clinical Studies section identifies hypervigilance as a PTSD symptom, but does not specifically link it to that undermodulation mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In response to trauma scripts, patients with the reexperiencing/hyperarousal response-as in PTSD-show decreased activation in anterior brain regions implicated in regulating arousal and emotion (ventromedial prefrontal cortex and rostral anterior cingulate cortex), decreased activation in the thalamus and occipital cortices, and increased activity in the amygdala and insula.

    “In response to trauma scripts, patients with the reexperiencing/hyperarousal response—as in PTSD—show decreased activation in anterior brain regions implicated in regulating arousal and emotion (ventromedial prefrontal cortex and rostral anterior cingulate cortex), decreased activation in the thalamus and occipital cortices, and increased activity in the amygdala and insula.53–58”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Neurobiological Studies section (page unavailable) reports low ventromedial prefrontal and rostral anterior cingulate activation in reexperiencing/hyperaroused PTSD, increased amygdala activation after traumatic reminders, and a positive correlation between reexperiencing severity during trauma scripts and right anterior insula activation. It does not report the claimed decreases in thalamic or occipital activation; the insula finding is a correlation, rather than an unqualified increase across patients. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Lanius et al. proposed a neurobiological model of PTSD-DS characterized primarily by symptoms of derealization, depersonalization, and tonic hypoarousal that contrasted with the more typical symptoms of re-experiencing and hyperarousal that feature predominately in the majority of cases of PTSD.

    “Building on this seminal work, Lanius et al. (2010) proposed a neurobiological model of PTSD-DS, characterized primarily by symptoms of derealization, depersonalization, and tonic hypoarousal that contrasted with the more typical symptoms of re-experiencing and hyperarousal that feature predominately in the majority of cases of PTSD.”

    From A review of the relation between dissociation, memory, executive functioning and social cognition in military members and civilians with neuropsychiatric conditions (2016) · cites this paper as Lanius et al., 2010

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This undermines the proposed neurobiological basis of the defense cascade model and the dissociative subtype as a whole.

    “Ultimately, this undermines the proposed neurobiological basis (e.g. Lanius et al., 2010; Terpou et al., 2019) of the defense cascade model and the dissociative subtype as a whole.”

    From Trauma-related dissociation and the autonomic nervous system: a systematic literature review of psychophysiological correlates of dissociative experiencing in PTSD patients (2022) · cites this paper as Lanius et al., 2010

    The Abstract and the Neurobiological Studies section propose a neural basis for the dissociative subtype of PTSD, involving prefrontal inhibition of limbic regions. The cited passages do not identify that account as the neurobiological basis of a defense cascade model. The assertion that this basis is undermined is the citing authors’ own conclusion, not a finding attributed to Lanius et al. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Individuals with PTSD have unique neural signatures that overlap with key brain regions involved in sensory transmission of interoceptive and exteroceptive sensations, including the brainstem, insula, and prefrontal cortex.

    “In addition to these core cognitive and affective symptoms, individuals with PTSD have shown unique neural signatures that overlap with key brain regions involved in the sensory transmission of incoming interoceptive and exteroceptive sensations, including the brainstem, the insula, and the prefrontal cortex (Lanius et al., 2010; Nicholson et al., 2015, 2017; Daniels et al., 2016; Sierk et al., 2”

    From How Processing of Sensory Information From the Internal and External Worlds Shape the Perception and Engagement With the World in the Aftermath of Trauma: Implications for PTSD (2021) · cites this paper as Lanius et al., 2010

    The Neurobiological Studies section reports distinct activation patterns in PTSD involving the medial prefrontal cortex and anterior insula, and describes the insula’s role in interoception. It does not identify a brainstem signature or characterize these regions collectively as transmitting incoming interoceptive and exteroceptive sensations. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [40]van der Kolk BA Pelcovitz D Roth S Mandel FS McFarlane A Herman JL Dissociation, somatization, and affect dysregulation: the complexity of adaptation to trauma. Am J Psychiatry 1996 153 July festschrift suppl 83 93 8659645
  2. [43]Krystal JH Bennett A Bremner JD Southwick SM Charney DS Friedman MJ Charney DS Deutch AY Toward a cognitive neuroscience of dissociation and altered memory functions in post-traumatic stress disorder Neurobiological and Clinical Consequences of Stress: From Normal Adaptation to PTSD 1995 239 269 Lippincott-Raven Philadelphia
  3. [45]Herman JL Davidson JRT Foa EB Sequelae of prolonged and repeated trauma: evidence for a complex posttraumatic syndrome (DESNOS) Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: DSM-IV and Beyond 1993 213 228 American Psychiatric Press Washington, DC

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lanius, R. A., Vermetten, E., Loewenstein, R. J., Brand, B., Schmahl, C., Bremner, J. D., & Spiegel, D.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2010-06-01
Volume
167
Issue
6
Pages
640-647
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2124556602
Cited by
1,123
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 74
FWCI
8.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000454)
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG018784)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL088726)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH080208, R01MH056120, R01MH047226, K24MH076955, T32MH067547, R01MH060556)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA118567, R01CA061309, U01CA197282)
  • National Center for Research Resources (S10RR016917)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (RC1AT005733, P30AT005886)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, emotional dysregulation, re-experiencing, hyperarousal, limbic regions, dissociation, trauma treatment, symptom profiles
MeSH terms
Affect, Amygdala, Cerebral Cortex, Chronic Disease, Dissociative Disorders, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory Disorders, Neural Inhibition, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review