Cited by 324Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMemory and Neural MechanismsMedicinal Plants and Neuroprotection

Impaired spatial learning in the APPSwe + PSEN1ΔE9 bigenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease

Reiserer, R. S., Harrison, F. E., Syverud, D. C., McDonald, M. P.·2007·Genes, Brain and Behavior

Abstract

Mice co-expressing the Swedish amyloid precursor protein mutation (APP(Swe)) and exon 9 deletion (DeltaE9) of the PSEN1 gene begin to develop amyloid plaques at 6-7 months of age. We demonstrate here a spatial learning deficit in 7-month-old APP(Swe) + PSEN1DeltaE9 bigenic mice using an adaptation of the Barnes maze. Mice were first trained on a cued target followed by a hidden-target condition. Although bigenic mice quickly learned the cued-target version of the task, they were significantly impaired when switched to the hidden-target version. In contrast, a separate group of double-transgenic mice trained first on the spatial hidden-target version of the task were unimpaired relative to wild-type controls. We propose that processes such as general rule learning, context learning and exploratory habituation exert a greater influence when the testing environment is novel and overshadow the spatial memory deficit in naive bigenic mice. However, when cued-target training is conducted first, these processes habituate and the spatial learning deficit is unmasked. Seven-month-old APP(Swe) + PSEN1DeltaE9 mice were unimpaired on tests of memory that did not involve learning the rules governing spatial associations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1601-183x.2006.00221.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reiserer, R. S., Harrison, F. E., Syverud, D. C., & McDonald, M. P.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
McDonald, M. P.
Venue
Genes, Brain and Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-04-13
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
54-65
ISSN
  • 1601-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1601-1848
OpenAlex
W2055883416
Cited by
324
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 16
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Genes Brain & Behavior (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG022439, AG-022439)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD015052, HD015052)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, APPswe, spatial learning, spatial memory, amyloid plaques, Barnes maze, rule induction, contextual learning, transgenic mouse model
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Anxiety, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Male, Mice, Neurologic Mutants, Mice, Transgenic, Space Perception, Spatial Behavior, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Gene Deletion, Maze Learning, Mice, Presenilin-1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review