The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE EFFECTS OF PSYCHOLOGICALLY BASED INTERVENTION PROGRAMS ON WORKER PRODUCTIVITY: A META‐ANALYSIS
Abstract
A meta‐analysis of the effects on worker productivity of 11 types of psychologically based organizational interventions showed that such programs, on average, raised worker productivity by nearly one‐half standard deviation. The strength of effects was found to vary by type of intervention, criterion of productivity, contextual factors in organizations, and features of research design. Also discussed in the paper are comparisons of conclusions reached through meta‐analysis versus traditional methods of literature review.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, J. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203771587 · Cited by 25,373
Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect Size and Related Estimators
Hedges, L. V. (1981) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164588 · Cited by 5,695
Cited by
HUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Shute, V. J. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307313795 · Cited by 4,631
Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.105 · Cited by 2,502
Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs
Morris, S. B. (2008) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428106291059 · Cited by 2,133
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.12.1181 · Cited by 2,033
Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features.
Arthur, W., Bennett, W., Edens, P. S., & Bell, S. T. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.234 · Cited by 1,252
Baltes, B. B., Briggs, T. E., Huff, J. W., Wright, J. A., & Neuman, G. A. (1999) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.496 · Cited by 837
Managing Human Resources in Small Organizations: What Do We Know?
Cardon, M. S., & Stevens, C. E. (2004) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.06.001 · Cited by 768
Estimating the Effect of Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates: A Meta-Analysis
Church, A. H. (1993) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/269355 · Cited by 705
What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology.
Schmidt, F. L. (1992) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.47.10.1173 · Cited by 564
The importance of pay in employee motivation: Discrepancies between what people say and what they do
Rynes, S. L., Gerhart, B., & Minette, K. A. (2004) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.20031 · Cited by 544
Cynicism about Organizational Change: Measurement, Antecedents, and Correlates
Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Austin, J. T. (2000) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601100252003 · Cited by 509
Healthy Mind—Healthy Organization—A Proactive Approach to Occupational Stress
Cooper, C. L., & Cartwright, S. (1994) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872679404700405 · Cited by 497
Glisson, C., & Schoenwald, S. K. (2005) · Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s11020-005-7456-1 · Cited by 373
Organizational Culture and Climate: Implications for Services and Interventions Research.
Hemmelgarn, A. L., Glisson, C., & James, L. R. (2006) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.2006.00008.x · Cited by 307
Glisson, C., Dukes, D., & Green, P. (2006) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.12.010 · Cited by 298
Feedback, a powerful lever in teams: A review
Gabelica, C., Bossche, P. V. D., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2012) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.003 · Cited by 146
What Predicts Software Developers’ Productivity?
Murphy-Hill, E., Jaspan, C., Sadowski, C., Shepherd, D., Phillips, M., Winter, C., Knight, A., Smith, E., & Jorde, M. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2019.2900308 · Cited by 100
Involvement in knowledge-acquisition activities by venture team members and venture performance
Chandler, G. N., & Lyon, D. W. (2009) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00317.x · Cited by 98
Correcting the Effect Size of d for Range Restriction and Unreliability
Bobko, P., Roth, P. L., & Bobko, C. (2001) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442810141003 · Cited by 84
Social uncertainty and interdependence: A study of resource allocation decisions in groups
Sniezek, J. A., May, D. R., & Sawyer, J. E. (1990) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(90)90027-7 · Cited by 55
Seeing Where You Stand: From Performance Feedback to Performance Transparency
Bernstein, E. S., & Li, S. (2017) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2017.14752abstract · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- GUZZO, R. A., JETTE, R. D., & KATZELL, R. A.
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-06
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 275-291
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W2119983086
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 32.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
